Low-frequency songs lose their potency in noisy urban conditions

Wouter Halfwerk1, Sander Bot2, Jasper Buikx1, Marco van der Velde2,3, Jan Komdeur2,3, Carel ten Cate1, Hans Slabbekoorn1
1Behavioral Biology, Institute of Biology (IBL), Leiden University, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands;
2Animal Ecology Group, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, Groningen University, 9750 AA, Haren, The Netherlands; and
3Behavioral Ecology and Self-Organisation, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, Groningen University, 9750 AA, Haren, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Many animal species communicate with their mates through acoustic signals, but this communication seems to become a struggle in urbanized areas because of increasing anthropogenic noise levels. Several bird species have been reported to increase song frequency by which they reduce the masking impact of spectrally overlapping noise. However, it remains unclear whether such behavioral flexibility provides a sufficient solution to noisy urban conditions or whether there are hidden costs. Species may rely on low frequencies to attract and impress females, and the use of high frequencies may, therefore, come at the cost of reduced attractiveness. We studied the potential tradeoff between signal strength and signal detection in a successful urban bird species, the great tit ( Parus major). We show that the use of low-frequency songs by males is related to female fertility as well as sexual fidelity. We experimentally show that urban noise conditions impair male–female communication and that signal efficiency depends on song frequency in the presence of noise. Our data reveal a response advantage for high-frequency songs during sexual signaling in noisy conditions, whereas low-frequency songs are likely to be preferred. These data are critical for our understanding of the impact of anthropogenic noise on wild-ranging birds, because they provide evidence for low-frequency songs being linked to reproductive success and to be affected by noise-dependent signal efficiency.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

JW Bradbury, SL Vehrencamp Principles of Animal Communication (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 1998).

10.1126/science.1150195

10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.002

10.1016/j.tree.2010.04.005

10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03487.x

10.1016/S0065-3454(05)35004-2

10.1038/424267a

10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.12.036

DA Potvin, KM Parris, RA Mulder, Geographically pervasive effects of urban noise on frequency and syllable rate of songs and calls in silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis). Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 278, 2464–2469 (2011).

10.1093/auk/123.3.639

10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.052

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00973.x

10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01914.x

SE Goodwin, WG Shriver, Effects of traffic noise on occupancy patterns of forest birds. Conserv Biol 25, 406–411 (2011).

10.1086/655428

10.1242/jeb.038299

10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.09.015

10.1098/rsbl.2010.0437

10.1086/656275

10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02410-2

10.1038/274683a0

10.1007/BF00300047

10.1080/09524622.2004.9753526

10.1073/pnas.0810124106

10.1038/381229a0

10.1126/science.296.5569.873

10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.028

10.1038/330745a0

10.1086/285264

10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.008

EJ Mockford, RC Marshall, Effects of urban noise on song and response behavior in great tits. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 276, 2979–2985 (2009).

10.1006/anbe.2003.2093

10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.09.005

10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.01.004

10.1093/auk/121.1.184

10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.07.011

10.1098/rspb.2000.1023

10.1038/35051570

10.1016/B978-012473070-0/50007-4

10.1080/03949370.2011.554881

10.1006/anbe.2001.1968

10.1006/anbe.2001.1885

10.1016/S0003-3472(82)80188-7

10.1007/BF01640537

R Reijnen, R Foppen, Impact of road traffic on breeding bird populations. The Ecology of Transportation: Managing Mobility for the Environment, eds J Davenport, JL Davenport (Springer, Heidelberg), pp. 255–274 (2006).

AV Kociolek, AP Clevenger, CC St Clair, DS Proppe, Effects of road networks on bird populations. Conserv Biol 25, 241–249 (2011).

10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99299.x

10.1007/BF02465629

10.1086/653660

10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.068

10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x

10.1006/anbe.1998.0879