Liberalizing trade in environmental goods and services
Tóm tắt
We examine the effects of trade liberalization in environmental goods in a model with one domestic downstream polluting firm and two upstream firms (one domestic, one foreign). The upstream firms offer their technologies to the downstream firm at a flat fee. The domestic government sets the emission tax rate after the outcome of R&D is known. The effect of liberalization on the domestic upstream firm’s R&D incentive is ambiguous. Liberalization usually results in cleaner production, which allows the country to reach higher welfare. However, this increase in welfare is typically achieved at the expense of the environment (a backfire effect).
Tài liệu tham khảo
Antweiler W, Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2001) Is free trade good for the environment? Am Econ Rev 91:877–908
Biglaiser G, Horowitz JK (1995) Pollution regulation and incentives for pollution-control research. J Econ Manag Strategy 3:663–684
Binswanger M (2001) Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? Ecol Econ 36:119–132
Bréchet T, Ly S (2013) The many traps of green technology promotion. Environ Econ Policy Stud 15:73–91
Canton J (2008) Redealing the cards: how an eco-industry modifies the political economy of environmental taxes. Resour Energy Econ 30:295–315
Cole MA, Elliott RJR (2003) Determining the trade-environment composition effect: the role of capital, labor and environmental regulations. J Environ Econ Manag 46:363–383
David M, Nimubona AD, Sinclair-Desgagné B (2011) Emission taxes and the market for abatement goods and services. Resour Energy Econ 33:179–191
De Melo J, Vijil M (2014) Barriers to trade in environmental goods and environmental services: how important are they? How much progress at reducing them? Nota di lavoro 36.2014, FEEM
Feess E, Muehlheusser G (2002) Strategic environmental policy, clean technologies and the learning curve. Environ Resour Econ 23:149–166
Fisher-Vanden K, Ho MS (2010) Technology, development, and the environment. J Environ Econ Manag 59:94–108
Fischer C, Parry IWH, Pizer WA (2003) Instrument choice for environmental protection when technological innovation is endogenous. J Environ Econ Manag 45:523–545
Greaker M (2006) Spillovers in the development of new pollution abatement technology: a new look at the Porter hypothesis. J Environ Econ Manag 56:411–420
Greaker M, Rosendahl KE (2008) Environmental policy with upstream pollution abatement technology firms. J Environ Econ Manag 56:246–259
Hamwey R (2005) Environmental goods: where do the dynamic trade opportunities for developing countries lie? Working paper prepared to support discussions at the Hong Kong Trade and Development Symposium and the sixth WTO ministerial Conference in Hong Kong in December 2005
Hanley N, McGregor P, Swales JK, Turner K (2009) Do increases in energy efficiency improve environmental quality and sustainability? Ecol Econ 68:692–709
Jaffe AB, Newell RG, Stavins RN (2003) Technological change and the environment. In: Maler KG, Vincent JR (eds). Handbook of environmental economics, vol I, pp 461–516
Khazzoom DJ (1980) Economic implications of mandated efficiency standards for household appliances. Energy J 1:21–40
Laffont JJ, Tirole J (1996) Pollution permits and environmental innovation. J Public Econ 62:127–140
Lovely M, Popp D (2011) Trade, technology, and the environment: does access to technology promote environmental regulation? J Environ Econ Manag 61:16–35
Managi S, Hibiki A, Tsurumi T (2009) Does trade openness improve environmental quality? J Environ Econ Manag 58:346–363
Milliman SR, Prince R (1989) Firms incentives to promote technological change in pollution control. J Environ Econ Manag 17:247–265
Nimubona AD (2012) Pollution policy and trade liberalization of environmental goods. Environ Resou Econ 53:323–346
OECD (2003) Environmental goods and services: the benefits of further global trade liberalisation. OECD, Paris
OECD (2005) Trade that benefits the environment and development: opening markets for environmental goods and services. OECD, Paris
Parry W (1995) Optimal pollution taxes and endogenous technological progress. Resour Energy Econ 17:69–85
Parry W (1998) Pollution regulation and the efficiency gains from technological innovation. J Regul Econ 14:229–254
Perino G (2010) Technology diffusion with market power in the upstream industry. Environ Resour Econ 46:403–428
Requate T (2005a) Dynamic incentives by environmental policy instruments—a survey. Ecol Econ 54:175–195
Requate T (2005b) Timing and commitment of environmental policy, adoption of new technology, and repercussions on R&D. Environ Resour Econ 31:175–199
Saunders HD (2000) A view from the macro side: rebound, backfire, and Khazzoom-Brookes. Energy Policy 28:439–449
Sinclair-Desgagné B (2008) The environmental goods and services industry. Int Rev Environ Resour Econ 2:69–99
UNEP, ITC and ICTSD (2012) “Trade and environment briefings: Trade in environmental goods”, ICTSD Programme on Global Economic Policy and Institutions; Policy Brief No. 6; International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/research/2012/06/trade-in-environmental-goods
USTR (2014) “Remarks by United States Trade Representative Michael Froman announcing new talks towards increased trade in environmental goods”, United States Trade Representative, 24 January 2014. https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2014/January/USTR-Froman-remarks-on-new-talks-towards-increased-trade-environmental-goods
World Trade Organization (2001) Ministerial declaration, ministerial conference, fourth session, Doha, 9–14 November 2001
Zhang ZX (2013) Trade in environmental goods, with focus on climate-friendly goods and technologies. In: van Calster G, Prévost D (eds) Research handbook on environment, health and the WTO. Edward Elgar, Northampton, pp 673–699