The uptake of the ecosystem services concept in planning discourses of European and American cities

Ahern, 2011, From fail-safe to safe-to-fail. Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world, Landsc. Urban Plan., 100, 341, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021 Ahern, 2014, The concept of ecosystem services in adaptive urban planning and design: a framework for supporting innovation, Landsc. Urban Plan., 125, 254, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.020 Albert, 2014, 2014. What ecosystem services information do users want? Investigating interests and requirements among landscape and regional planners in Germany, Lands. Ecol., 29, 1301, 10.1007/s10980-014-9990-5 Albrechts, 2006, Bridge the gap: from spatial planning to strategic projects, Eur. Plan. Stud., 14, 1487, 10.1080/09654310600852464 Amt für Stadtplanung und Verkehr, 2009, Die zukünftige Entwicklung der Stadt Salzburg, Räumliches Entwicklungskonzept der Stadt Salzburg REK, 2007 Amt für Statistik Berlin-Brandenburg, 2013 Artmann, 2014, Assessment of soil sealing management responses, strategies and targets towards ecologically sustainable urban land use management, AMBIO, 43, 530, 10.1007/s13280-014-0511-1 Baró, 2014, Contribution of ecosystem services to air quality and climate change mitigation policies: the case of urban forests in Barcelona, Spain, AMBIO, 43, 466, 10.1007/s13280-014-0507-x Barthel, 2005, History and local management of a biodiversity-rich, urban cultural landscape, Ecol. Soc., 10, 10.5751/ES-01568-100210 Bastian, 2012, Ecosystem properties, potentials and services – the EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example, Ecol. Indic., 21, 7, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.03.014 Batker, D., Swedeen, P., R. Costanza, de La Torre, I., Boumans, R., Bagstad, K., 2008. A new view of the Puget Sound Economy: the economic value of nature׳s services in the Puget Sound Basin. Tacoma, WA. Brunauer, 2014 Ciecko, 2012, Seattle׳s forest ecosystem value City of Seattle, 2013. About Seattle. Land Use. Available from: 〈www.seattle.gov/dpd/cityplanning/populationdemographics/aboutseattle/landuse/default.htm〉 (accessed 04.03.14). Colding, 2011, The role of ecosystem services in contemporary urban planning, 228 Colding, 2013, Local assessment of Stockholm: revisiting the Stockholm Urban Assessment, 313 Cowling, 2008, Ecosystem services special feature: an operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation, PNAS, 105, 9483, 10.1073/pnas.0706559105 de Groot, 1992 Daily, 2009, Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver, Front. Ecol. Environ., 7, 21, 10.1890/080025 EC, 2011. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Our life Insurance, Our Natural Capital: An EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. COM(2011) 244 Final, Brussels. EC, 2013. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Green Infrastructure (GI) – Enhancing Europe׳s Natural Capital. COM(2013) 249 final. Faludi, 2000, The performance of spatial planning, Plan. Pract. Res., 15, 299, 10.1080/713691907 Fisher, 2009, Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making, Ecol. Econ., 68, 643, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014 Frantzeskaki, 2014, Dynamics of urban ecosystem governance of Rotterdam, The Netherlands, AMBIO, 43, 542, 10.1007/s13280-014-0512-0 Gemeinsame Landesplanungsabteilung Berlin-Brandenburg, 2013. Raumordnungsbericht 2013. Hauptstadtregion Berlin-Brandenburg. Getzner, 2011, Fließstrecken der Mur – Ermittlung der Ökosystemleistungen.(River sections of the Mur – Assessment of Ecosystem Services) Götzl, M., Schwaiger, E., Sonderegger, G., Süßenbacher, E., 2011. Ökosystemleistungen und Landwirtschaft. Erstellung eines Inventars für Österreich (Ecoystem Services and Agriculture. An inventory for Austria). Umweltbundesamt, Reports 0355, Wien. Gómez-Baggethun, 2013, Urban ecosystem services, 175 Granath, F., Blom, G., Östergård, H., Andersson, J., Inghe, O., Hagbarth, U., Ivarsson, M., et al., 2012. Sammanställd information om Ekosystemtjänster (Compiled information on ecosystem services). Available from: 〈www.naturvardsverket.se/upload/miljoarbete-i-samhallet/miljoarbete-i-sverige/regeringsuppdrag/2012/ekosystem-ekosystemtjanster/ekosystem-tjanster.pdf〉 (accessed 06.03.14). Gunder, 2009, Planning in ten words or less Haaren, 2011, Integrating ecosystem services and environmental planning: limitations and synergies, TBSM, 7, 150 Haase, 2014, A quantitative review of urban ecosystem services assessment: concepts, models and implementation, AMBIO, 43, 413, 10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0 Hauck, 2013, Benefits and limitations of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy and decision making: some stakeholder perspectives, Environ. Sci. Policy, 25, 13, 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.08.001 Honrado, 2013, Can we infer about ecosystem services from EIA and SEA practice? A framework for analysis and examples from Portugal, Environ. Impact Assess., 40, 14, 10.1016/j.eiar.2012.12.002 Howlett, 2009, The dependent variable problem in the study of policy change: understanding policy change as a methodological problem, J. Comp. Pol. Anal., 11, 33 Kabisch, 2015, Ecosystem service implementation and governance challenges in urban green space planning — The case of Berlin, Germany, Land Use Policy, 42, 557, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.09.005 Karvonen, 2010, Metronatural™: Inventing and reworking urban nature in Seattle, Prog. Plan., 74, 153, 10.1016/j.progress.2010.07.001 Kopperoinen, 2014, Using expert knowledge in combining green infrastructure and ecosystem services in land use planning: an insight into a new place-based methodology, Landsc. Ecol., 10.1007/s10980-014-0014-2 Kumar, 2010, The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity Lachmund, 2013, Greening Berlin Lewan, L., 2000. Ekologiska fotavtryck & biokapacitet: verktyg för planering och uppföljning av hållbar utveckling i ett internationellt perspektiv (Ecological Footprints & Biocapacity: Tools for planning and follow-up of sustainable development in an international perspective). Available from: 〈http://www.boverket.se/Global/Webbokhandel/Dokument/2000/ekologiska_fotavtryck_och_biokapacitet.pdf〉 (accessed 04.03.14). Li, 2005, Comprehensive concept planning of urban greening based on ecological principles: a case study in Beijing, China, Landsc. Urban Plan., 72, 325, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.04.002 MA, 2005, Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis Matzdorf, 2014, The relevance of the ecosystem services framework for developed countries׳ environmental policies: a comparative case study of the US and EU, Land Use Policy, 38, 509, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.12.011 McPhearson, 2013, Mapping ecosystem services in New York City: applying a social–ecological approach in urban vacant land, Ecosyst. Serv., 5, 11, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.06.005 McPhearson, 2013, New York city biodiversity, green space, and ecosystem services, 355 McPhearson, 2014, Urban ecosystem services for resilience planning and management in New York city, AMBIO, 43, 502, 10.1007/s13280-014-0509-8 2013, Sustainable Stockholm Molnar, 2012, Managing natural wealth: research and implementation of ecosystem services in the United States and Canada, Ecosyst. Serv., 2, 45, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.005 NCY Planning, 2010. 2010 Primary Land Use. Available from: 〈http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/pdf/landusefacts/landuse_tables.pdf〉 (accessed 06.03.14). Newman, P., Thornley, A., 2013. Case study window. Global Cities: Governance Cultures and Urban Policy in New York, Paris, Tokyo and Beijing. In: Young, G., Stevenson, D. (Eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning and Culture, pp. 69–84. Niemelä, 2010, Using the ecosystem services approach for better planning and conservation of urban green spaces. A Finland case study, Biodivers. Conserv., 19, 3225, 10.1007/s10531-010-9888-8 Norgaard, 2010, Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1219, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.009 Piwowarczyk, 2013, Marine ecosystem services in urban areas: do the strategic documents of Polish coastal municipalities reflect their importance?, Landsc. Urban Plan., 109, 85, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.009 Primmer, 2012, Operationalising ecosystem service approaches for governance: Do measuring, mapping and valuing integrate sector-specific knowledge systems?, Ecosys. Serv., 1, 85, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.008 Rall, 2011, Creative intervention in a dynamic city: a sustainability assessment of an interim use strategy for brownfields in Leipzig, Germany, Landsc. Urban Plan., 100, 189, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.12.004 Rall, E.L., Kabisch, N., Hansen, R., 2014. Operationalizing Ecosystem Services in Urban Planning: An Exploration of Implementation and Challenges in New York and Berlin, in review. Randolph, 2012 Roe, 1994 Rouse, 2013, Green infrastructure Ruckelshaus, M., McKenzie, E., Tallis, H., Guerry, A., Daily, G., Kareiva, P., Polasky, S., et al., Notes from the field: lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions. Ecol. Econ., in press. Scarlett, L., Boyd, J., Ecosystem services and resource management: institutional issues, challenges, and opportunities in the public sector. Ecol. Econ., 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.09.013, in press. Schewenius, 2014, Opportunities for increasing resilience and sustainability of urban social–ecological systems: insights from the URBES and the cities biodiversity outlook projects, AMBIO, 43, 434, 10.1007/s13280-014-0505-z Schröter, M., van der Zanden, E.H., van Oudenhoven, A.P., Remme, R.P., Serna-Chavez, H.M., de Groot, R.S., Opdam, P., Ecosystem services as a contested concept: a synthesis of critique and counter-arguments. Conserv. Lett., 10.1111/conl.12091, in press. Schwarz, 2011, Assessing climate impacts of planning policies – an estimation for the urban region of Leipzig (Germany), Environ. Impact Assess., 31, 97, 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.02.002 Stadsledningskontoret, 2013. Stockholm: Facts & Figures 2013. Available from: 〈www.statistikomstockholm.se/attachments/article/21/facts%20and%20figures%202013_webb.pdf〉 (accessed 06.03.14). Stadt Salzburg (Ed.), 2013. Salzburg in Zahlen. Stand 2013. Statistik Austria, 2013. Stadtregionen Abgrenzung 2001 – Stand 1.1.2013. TEEB, 2011. TEEB Manual for Cities: Ecosystem Services in Urban Management. The City of New York, 2013. plaNYC. A Stronger, More Resilient New York. Available from: 〈www.nyc.gov/html/planyc2030〉 (accessed 06.03.14). US Census Bureau, 2010. People Quick Facts, New York (City). Available from: 〈http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/36/3651000.html〉 (accessed 04.03.14). US Census Bureau, 2011. Table 1. Annual Estimates of the Population of Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas. Available from: 〈www.census.gov/popest/data/metro/totals/2011/tables/CBSA-EST2011-01.csv〉 (accessed 06.03.14). US Census Bureau, 2012. Patterns of Metropolitan and Micropolitan Population Change, 2000 to 2010. US Census Bureau, 2014a. State & County QuickFacts. New York (city), New York. Available from: 〈http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/36/3651000.html〉 (accessed 06.03.14). US Census Bureau, 2014b. State & County QuickFacts. Seattle (city), Washington. Available from: 〈http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/53/5363000.html〉 (accessed 06.03.14). Wilkinson, 2013, Strategic spatial planning and the ecosystem services concept – an historical exploration, Ecol. Soc., 18, 37, 10.5751/ES-05368-180137 Young, 2013, Mainstreaming urban ecosystem services: a national survey of municipal foresters, Urban Ecosyst., 16, 703, 10.1007/s11252-013-0287-2