Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society
Tài liệu tham khảo
Glasziou, 2020, Waste in covid-19 research, BMJ, 369, m1847, 10.1136/bmj.m1847
Schwab, 2020, Science after Covid-19: faster, better, stronger?, Significance, 4, 8
Wynants, 2020, Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal, BMJ, 369, m1328, 10.1136/bmj.m1328
Alexander, 2020, COVID-19 coronavirus research has overall low methodological quality thus far: case in point for chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine, J Clin Epidemiol, 123, 120, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.04.016
Chalmers, 2009, Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence, Lancet, 374, 86, 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9
Englund, 2020, Rise and fall: Hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19 global trends: interest, political influence, and potential implications, ACR Open Rheumatol, 2, 760, 10.1002/acr2.11207
Altman, 1994, The scandal of poor medical research, BMJ, 308, 283, 10.1136/bmj.308.6924.283
Higginson, 2016, Current incentives for scientists lead to underpowered studies with erroneous conclusions, PLOS Biol, 14, 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000995
Rice, 2020, Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities, BMJ, 369, m2081, 10.1136/bmj.m2081
Ioannidis, 2014, Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis, Lancet, 383, 166, 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62227-8
Glasziou, 2014, Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research, Lancet, 383, 267, 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62228-X
Hemingway, 2009, Ten steps towards improving prognosis research, BMJ, 339, b4184, 10.1136/bmj.b4184
Wang, 2018, Researcher requests for inappropriate analysis and reporting: a U.S. survey of consulting biostatisticians, Ann Intern Med, 169, 554, 10.7326/M18-1230
Begley, 2015, Reproducibility in science: improving the standard for basic and preclinical research, Circ Res, 116, 116, 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.303819
Altman, 2002, How statistical expertise is used in medical research, JAMA, 287, 2817, 10.1001/jama.287.21.2817
Gigerenzer, 1998, We need statistical thinking, not statistical rituals, Behav Brain Sci, 21, 199, 10.1017/S0140525X98281167
Glasziou, 2018, Research waste is still a scandal – an essay by Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers, BMJ, 363, k4645, 10.1136/bmj.k4645
Saginur, 2020, Journal impact factor, trial effect size, and methodological quality appear scantly related: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Syst Rev, 9, 53, 10.1186/s13643-020-01305-w
Waltman, 2012, Some Limitations of the H Index: a commentary on Ruscio and Colleagues’ analysis of bibliometric indices, Measurement, 10, 172
Koole, 2012, Rewarding replications: a sure and simple way to improve psychological science, Perspect Psychol Sci, 7, 608, 10.1177/1745691612462586
Pereira, 2012, Empirical evaluation of very large treatment effects of medical interventions, JAMA, 308, 1676, 10.1001/jama.2012.13444
Bierer, 2018, Universal funder responsibilities that advance social value, Am J Bioeth, 18, 30, 10.1080/15265161.2018.1523498
Bendiscioli, 2019, The troubles with peer review for allocating research funding, EMBO Rep, 20, e49472, 10.15252/embr.201949472
Moher, 2020, The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: fostering research integrity, PLoS Biol, 18, 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737
Hardwicke, 2020, How often do leading biomedical journals use statistical experts to evaluate statistical methods? The results of a survey, PLOS One, 15, 10.1371/journal.pone.0239598
Luykx, 1949, Progress without statistics, JAMA, 141, 195, 10.1001/jama.1949.62910030004007
Vassar, 2019, Using the CONSORT statement to evaluate the completeness of reporting of addiction randomised trials: a cross-sectional review, BMJ Open, 9, 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032024
Peat, 2014, Improving the transparency of prognosis research: the role of reporting, data sharing, registration, and protocols, PLoS Med, 11, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001671
Fanelli, 2015, Misconduct policies, academic culture and career stage, not gender or pressures to publish, affect scientific integrity, PLoS One, 10, 10.1371/journal.pone.0127556
Head, 2015, The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science, PLoS Biol, 13, 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106
Dwan, 2014, Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials, PLOS Med, 11, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001666
Goldacre, 2019, COMPARE: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time, Trials, 20, 118, 10.1186/s13063-019-3173-2
Boutron, 2020, Spin in scientific publications: a frequent detrimental research practice, Ann Emerg Med, 75, 432, 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.11.002
Sumner, 2014, The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study, BMJ, 349, g7015, 10.1136/bmj.g7015
Blümle, 2014, Fate of clinical research studies after ethical approval–follow-up of study protocols until publication, PLoS One, 9, e87184, 10.1371/journal.pone.0087184
Zarin, 2019, Harms from uninformative clinical trials, JAMA, 322, 813, 10.1001/jama.2019.9892
Duyx, 2017, Scientific citations favor positive results: a systematic review and meta-analysis, J Clin Epidemiol, 88, 92, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.002
Rubin, 2017, When Does HARKing Hurt? Identifying when different types of undisclosed post hoc hypothesizing harm scientific progress, Rev Gen Psychol, 21, 308, 10.1037/gpr0000128
Yordanov, 2015, Avoidable waste of research related to inadequate methods in clinical trials, BMJ, 350, h809, 10.1136/bmj.h809
Adams-Huet, 2009, Bridging clinical investigators and statisticians: writing the statistical methodology for a research proposal, J Investig Med, 57, 818, 10.2310/JIM.0b013e3181c2996c
Delgado-Rodriguez, 2001, Participation of epidemiologists and/or biostatisticians and methodological quality of published controlled clinical trials, J Epidemiol Community Health, 55, 569, 10.1136/jech.55.8.569
Emanuel, 2000, What makes clinical research ethical?, JAMA, 283, 2701, 10.1001/jama.283.20.2701
Odutayo, 2015, Reporting of a publicly accessible protocol and its association with positive study findings in cardiovascular trials (from the Epidemiological Study of Randomized Trials [ESORT]), Am J Cardiol, 116, 1280, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.07.046
Savović, 2012, Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials, Ann Intern Med, 157, 429, 10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00537
Thompson, 2019, The ego has landed! What can be done about research misconduct, scandals, and spins?, Am J Med, 132, 552, 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.11.034
Moher, 2016, Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: who's listening?, Lancet, 387, 1573, 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00307-4
Altman, 2008, EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research, Open Med, 2, e49
Nosek, 2015, Scientific standards. Promoting an open research culture, Science, 348, 1422, 10.1126/science.aab2374
Chambers, 2019, What's next for registered reports?, Nature, 573, 187, 10.1038/d41586-019-02674-6
Wilkinson, 2016, The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship, Sci Data, 3, 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Siebert, 2020, Data-sharing recommendations in biomedical journals and randomized controlled trials: an audit of journals following the ICMJE recommendations, BMJ Open, 10, 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038887
Bradley, 2020, Reducing bias and improving transparency in medical research: a critical overview of the problems, progress so far and suggested next steps, J R Soc Med, 113, 433, 10.1177/0141076820956799
Omar, 2006, Quality research in healthcare: are researchers getting enough statistical support?, BMC Health Serv Res, 6
