Count data stochastic frontier models, with an application to the patents–R&D relationship

Aigner D, Lovell C, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Economet 6:21–37 Bhat C (2003) Simulation estimation of mixed discrete choice models using randomized and scrambled Halton sequences. Transport Res Part B (Methodol) 37:837–855 Caflisch R, Morokoff W, Owen A (1997) Valuation of mortgage backed securities using brownian bridges to reduce effective dimension. J Comput Finance 1:27–46 Cameron C, Johansson P (1997) Count data regression using series expansions: with applications. J Appl Economet 12:203–224 Cameron C, Trivedi P (1986) Econometric models based on count data: comparison and applications of some estimators. J Appl Economet 1:29–53 Cramer J (1986) Econometric applications of maximum likelihood methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA Delaporte P (1962) Sur l’efficacite des criteres de tarification de l’assurance contre les accidents d’automobiles. ASTIN Bull 2:84–95 Denuit M, Lambert P (2005) Constraints on concordance measures in bivariate discrete data. J Multivar Anal 93:40–57 DeVuyst E, Preckel P (2007) Gaussian cubature: a practitioner’s guide. Math Comput Modell 45:787–794 Doornik JA (2007) Ox: an object-oriented matrix programming language. Timberlake Consultants Ltd, London Fan J, Farmen M, Gijbels I (2002) Local maximum likelihood estimation and inference. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol) 60:591–608 Fan J, Lin H, Zhou Y (2006) Local partial-likelihood estimation for lifetime data. Ann Stat 34:290–325 Fé E (2007) Exploring a stochastic frontier model when the dependent variable is a count. The school of economics discussion paper series, University of Manchester 0725 Fé E (2008) On the production of economic bads and the estimation of production efficiency when the dependent variable is a count. The school of economics discussion paper series, University of Manchester 0812 Gentle JE (2003) Random Number Generation and Monte Carlo Methods, 2nd edn. Springer, New York Goffe W (1996) Simann: a global optimization algorithm using simulated annealing. Stud Nonlinear Dyn Economet 1:169–176 Goffe W, Ferrier G, Rogers J (1994) Global optimization of statistical functions with simulated annealing. J Economet 60:65–99 Gourieroux C, Monfort A (1995) Statistics and econometric models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA Gourieroux C, Monfort A, Trognon A (1984a) Pseudo maximum likelihood methods: applications to Poisson models. Econometrica 52:701–720 Gourieroux C, Monfort A, Trognon A (1984b) Pseudo maximum likelihood methods: theory. Econometrica 52:681–700 Gozalo P, Linton O (2000) Local nonlinear least squares: using parametric information in nonparametric regression. J Economet 99:63–106 Greene W (2003) Simulated likelihood estimation of the normal-gamma stochastic frontier function. J Prod Anal 19:179–190 Greene W (2004) Distinguishing between heterogeneity and inefficiency: stochastic frontier analysis of the World Health Organization’s panel data on national health care systems. Health Econ 13:959–980 Greene W (2005) Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model. J Economet 126:269–303 Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics and economic indicators: a survey. J Economet Lit 28:1661–1707 Hall B, Cummins C, Laderman E, Murphy J (1986a) The R&D master file documentation. Technical Working Paper, NBER 72 Hall B, Griliches Z, Hausman JA (1986b) Patents and R&D: is there a lag? Int Econ Rev 27:265–283 Hausman J, Hall B, Griliches Z (1984) Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents R&D relationship. Econometrica 52:909–938 Hofler R, Scrogin D (2008) A count data stochastic frontier. Discussion paper, University of Central Florida Jondrow J, Materov I, Lovell K, Schmidt P (1982) On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. J Economet 19:233–238 Judd KL (1998) Numerical methods in economics. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Karlis D, Xekalaki E (2005) Mixed Poisson distributions. Int Stat Rev 73:35–58 Kumbhakar S, Park B, Simar L, Tsionas E (2007) Nonparametric stochastic frontiers: a local maximum likelihood approach. J Economet 137:1–27 Kumbhakar SC, Lovell K (2003) Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA Lancaster A (2000) The incidental parameter problem since 1948. J Economet 95:391–413 Loader C (1996) Local likelihood density estimation. Ann Stat 24:1602–1618 Meeusen W, van den Broeck J (1977) Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. Int Econ Rev 18:435–444 Neyman J, Scott E (1948) Consistent estimation from partially consistent observations. Econometrica 16:1–32 Pakes A (1986) Patents as options: some estimates of the value of holding European patent stocks. Econometrica 54:755–784 Pakes A, Griliches Z (1980) Patents and R&D at the firm level: a first report. Econ Lett 5:377–381 Park B, Simar L, Zelenyuk V (2008) Local likelihood estimation of truncated regression and its partial derivatives: theory and application. J Economet 146:185–198 Press W, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1992) Numerical Recipes in C (The art of Scientific Computing), 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA Ruohonen M (1989) On a model for the claim number process. ASTIN Bull 18:57–68 Tibshirani R, Hastie T (1987) Local likelihood estimation. J Am Econ Assoc 82:559–567 Train K (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA Wang P, Cockburn IM, Puterman ML (1998) Analysis of patent data: a mixed-poisson-regression-model approach. J Bus Econ Stat 16:27–41 Wang W, Schmidt P (2009) On the distribution of estimated technical efficiency in stochastic frontier models. J Economet 148:36–45 White H (1982) Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica 53:1–16 Winkelmann R (2008) Econometric analysis of count data, 5th edn. Springer, New York Zheng J (1996) A consistent test of functional form via non-parametric estimation techniques. J Economet 76:263–289