Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and the Challenges of Implementing an Emerging Breast Cancer Screening Technology Into Clinical Practice

2010, Advances in breast imaging. Although mammography remains standard for breast cancer screening, several newer technologies are helping to fine-tune diagnosis, Harv Womens Health Watch, 17, 1 van Ravesteyn, 2012, Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years: a comparative modeling study of risk, Ann Intern Med, 156, 609, 10.7326/0003-4819-156-9-201205010-00002 Pisano, 2005, Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening, N Engl J Med, 353, 1773, 10.1056/NEJMoa052911 Wallis, 2012, Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study, Radiology, 262, 788, 10.1148/radiol.11103514 Skaane, 2012, Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting, Acta Radiol, 53, 524, 10.1258/ar.2012.120062 Gur, 2009, Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 193, 586, 10.2214/AJR.08.2031 Michell, 2012, A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis, Clin Radiol, 67, 976, 10.1016/j.crad.2012.03.009 Bernardi, 2012, Prospective study of breast tomosynthesis as a triage to assessment in screening, Breast Cancer Res Treat, 133, 267, 10.1007/s10549-012-1959-y Svahn, 2010, The diagnostic accuracy of dual-view digital mammography, single-view breast tomosynthesis and a dual-view combination of breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in a free-response observer performance study, Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 139, 113, 10.1093/rpd/ncq044 Skaane, 2013, Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program, Radiology, 267, 47, 10.1148/radiol.12121373 Ciatto, 2013, Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study, Lancet Oncol, 14, 583, 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70134-7 Tosteson, 2008, Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening, Ann Intern Med, 148, 1, 10.7326/0003-4819-148-1-200801010-00002 Gold, 2012, The emergence of diagnostic imaging technologies in breast cancer: discovery, regulatory approval, reimbursement, and adoption in clinical guidelines, Cancer Imaging, 12, 13, 10.1102/1470-7330.2012.0003 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Benefits Improvement and Protection Act of 2000. Ruling No. 01-01. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Rulings/downloads/cmsr0101.pdf. Accessed June 14, 2013. Warren Burhenne, 2000, Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography, Radiology, 215, 554, 10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma15554 Birdwell, 2001, Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection, Radiology, 219, 192, 10.1148/radiology.219.1.r01ap16192 Fenton, 2007, Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography, N Engl J Med, 356, 1399, 10.1056/NEJMoa066099 Noble, 2009, Computer-aided detection mammography for breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis, Arch Gynecol Obstet, 279, 881, 10.1007/s00404-008-0841-y Taylor, 2008, Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate, Eur J Cancer, 44, 798, 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.02.016 Fenton, 2010, Diffusion of computer-aided mammography after mandated Medicare coverage, Arch Intern Med, 170, 987, 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.104 Szabo L. New 3-D mammograms have benefits, risks. USA Today. October 9, 2012. Available at: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/10/09/3d-mammogram-tomosynthesis/1615719/. Accessed August 19, 2013. Are You Dense Advocacy. D.E.N.S.E. state efforts. Available at: http://Areyoudenseadvocacy.org/dense/. Accessed June 16, 2013. Lee, 2012, Breast density legislation and opportunities for patient-centered outcomes research, Radiology, 264, 632, 10.1148/radiol.12120184 Berg, 2008, Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer, JAMA, 299, 2151, 10.1001/jama.299.18.2151 Kelly, 2010, Breast cancer detection: radiologists' performance using mammography with and without automated whole-breast ultrasound, Eur Radiol, 20, 2557, 10.1007/s00330-010-1844-1 Poplack, 2007, Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 189, 616, 10.2214/AJR.07.2231 Feng, 2012, Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization, Radiology, 263, 35, 10.1148/radiol.11111789 Gur, 2012, Dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening using synthetically reconstructed projection images: an observer performance study, Acad Radiol, 19, 166, 10.1016/j.acra.2011.10.003 Good, 2008, Digital breast tomosynthesis: a pilot observer study, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 190, 865, 10.2214/AJR.07.2841 Zuley, 2010, Time to diagnosis and performance levels during repeat interpretations of digital breast tomosynthesis: preliminary observations, Acad Radiol, 17, 450, 10.1016/j.acra.2009.11.011 Tagliafico, 2012, Mammographic density estimation: one-to-one comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using fully automated software, Eur Radiol, 22, 1265, 10.1007/s00330-012-2380-y Tagliafico, 2012, One-to-one comparison between digital spot compression view and digital breast tomosynthesis, Eur Radiol, 22, 539, 10.1007/s00330-011-2305-1 Noroozian, 2012, Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization, Radiology, 262, 61, 10.1148/radiol.11101763 Pearson, 2008, Assessing the comparative effectiveness of a diagnostic technology: CT colonography, Health Aff (Millwood), 27, 1503, 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1503 Pandharipande, 2009, Comparative effectiveness research: what it means for radiology, Radiology, 253, 600, 10.1148/radiol.2533091286 Tunis, 2009, The National Oncologic PET Registry: lessons learned for coverage with evidence development, J Am Coll Radiol, 6, 360, 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.01.016