Sexual Rehabilitation After Treatment for Prostate Cancer—Part 1: Recommendations From the Fourth International Consultation for Sexual Medicine (ICSM 2015)

The Journal of Sexual Medicine - Tập 14 - Trang 285-296 - 2017
Andrea Salonia1, Ganesh Adaikan2, Jacques Buvat3, Serge Carrier4, Amr El-Meliegy5, Kostas Hatzimouratidis6, Andrew McCullough7, Abraham Morgentaler8, Luiz Otavio Torres9, Mohit Khera10
1Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
2Section of Sexual Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National University Hospital, National University of Singapore, Singapore
3Centre d’études et de traitement de la pathologie de l’appareil reproducteur (CETPARP), Lille, France
4Department of Urology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
5Department of Andrology, Sexology and STDs, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
6Second Department of Urology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Pefka Thessaloniki, Greece
7Division of Urology, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
8Men's Health Boston and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
9Centro Universitário UniBH, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
10Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

Tóm tắt

Abstract Introduction Sexual dysfunction is common in patients after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. Aim To provide the International Consultation for Sexual Medicine (ICSM) 2015 recommendations concerning prevention and management strategies for post-RP erectile function impairment in terms of preoperative patient characteristics and intraoperative factors that could influence erectile function recovery. Methods A literature search was performed using Google and PubMed databases for English-language original and review articles published up to August 2016. Main Outcome Measures Levels of evidence (LEs) and grades of recommendations (GRs) based on a thorough analysis of the literature and committee consensus. Results Nine recommendations are provided by the ICSM 2015 committee on sexual rehabilitation after RP. Recommendation 1 states that clinicians should discuss the occurrence of postsurgical erectile dysfunction (temporary or permanent) with every candidate for RP (expert opinion, clinical principle). Recommendation 2 states that validated instruments for assessing erectile function recovery such as the International Index of Erectile Function and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaires are available to monitor EF recovery after RP (LE = 1, GR = A). Recommendation 3 states there is insufficient evidence that a specific surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic vs robot-assisted radical prostatectomy) promotes better results in postoperative EF recovery (LE = 2, GR = C). Recommendation 4 states that recognized predictors of EF recovery include but are not limited to younger age, preoperative EF, and bilateral nerve-sparing surgery (LE = 2, GR = B). Recommendation 5 states that patients should be informed about key elements of the pathophysiology of postoperative erectile dysfunction, such as nerve injury and cavernous venous leak (expert opinion, clinical principle). Conclusions This article discusses Recommendations 1 to 5 of the ICSM 2015 committee on sexual rehabilitation after RP.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Siegel, 2015, Cancer statistics, 2015, CA Cancer J Clin, 65, 5, 10.3322/caac.21254 DeSantis, 2014, Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014, CA Cancer J Clin, 64, 252, 10.3322/caac.21235 Torre, 2015, Global cancer statistics, 2012, CA Cancer J Clin, 65, 87, 10.3322/caac.21262 Mottet, EAU guidelines on prostate cancer AUA guidelines on prostate cancer NCCN guidelines on prostate cancer Mulhall, 2010, Erectile function rehabilitation in the radical prostatectomy patient, J Sex Med, 7, 1687 Salonia, 2012, Prevention and management of postprostatectomy sexual dysfunctions. Part 1: choosing the right patient at the right time for the right surgery, Eur Urol, 62, 261, 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.04.046 Salonia, 2012, Prevention and management of postprostatectomy sexual dysfunctions part 2: recovery and preservation of erectile function, sexual desire, and orgasmic function, Eur Urol, 62, 273, 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.04.047 Weyne, 2015, Landmarks in erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy, Nat Rev Urol, 12, 289, 10.1038/nrurol.2015.72 Frey, 2014, Neglected side effects after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review, J Sex Med, 11, 374 Walz, 2010, A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 57, 179, 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.009 Walz, 2016, A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy of the prostate related to optimisation of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy: an update, Eur Urol, 70, 301, 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.026 Mulhall, 2002, Erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: hemodynamic profiles and their correlation with the recovery of erectile function, J Urol, 167, 1371 Mulhall, 2008, Artery sparing radical prostatectomy—myth or reality?, J Urol, 179, 827 Nehra, 2008, Pharmacoangiographic evidence of the presence and anatomical dominance of accessory pudendal artery(s), J Urol, 179, 2317 Secin, 2007, Anatomy and preservation of accessory pudendal arteries in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 51, 1229, 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.030 Tal, 2009, Persistent erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy: the association between nerve-sparing status and the prevalence and chronology of venous leak, J Sex Med, 6, 2813 Carter, 2013, Anatomic and technical considerations for optimizing recovery of sexual function during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, Curr Opin Urol, 23, 88, 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32835b6602 Montorsi, 2012, Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel, Eur Urol, 62, 368, 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.057 Ficarra, 2012, Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 62, 418, 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.046 Capogrosso, 2016, Orgasmic dysfunction after robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 70, 223, 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.046 Fode, 2013, Penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: what the evidence really says, BJU Int, 112, 998 Storås, 2016, Erectile dysfunction and sexual problems two to three years after prostatectomy among American, Norwegian, and Spanish patients, Clin Genitourin Cancer, 14, e265, 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.10.009 Sridhar, 2016, Recovery of baseline erectile function in men following radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: a prospective analysis using validated measures, J Sex Med, 13, 435 McCabe, 2016, Definitions of sexual dysfunctions in women and men: a consensus statement from the Fourth International Consultation on Sexual Medicine 2015, J Sex Med, 13, 135 Mulhall, 2009, Defining and reporting erectile function outcomes after radical prostatectomy: challenges and misconceptions, J Urol, 181, 462 Salonia, 2006, Baseline potency in candidates for bilateral nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 50, 360, 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.007 Salonia, 2008, Remembered International Index of Erectile Function domain scores are not accurate in assessing preoperative potency in candidates for bilateral nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy, J Sex Med, 5, 677 Stember, 2013, Preoperative erectile function is an independent predictor for decision to spare cavernous nerves during radical prostatectomy, J Sex Med, 10, 2101 Köhler, 2014, Psychological distress and adjustment to disease in patients before and after radical prostatectomy. Results of a prospective multi-centre study, Eur J Cancer Care (Engl), 23, 795, 10.1111/ecc.12186 NIH Consensus Conference, 1993, Impotence. NIH consensus development panel on impotence, JAMA, 270, 83, 10.1001/jama.1993.03510010089036 Hatzimouratidis, 2009, Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in postprostatectomy erectile dysfunction: a critical analysis of the basic science rationale and clinical application, Eur Urol, 55, 334, 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.10.028 Kim, 2011, Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic, Eur Urol, 60, 413, 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.011 Gandaglia, 2016, Non-surgically related causes of erectile dysfunction after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy, Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 19, 185, 10.1038/pcan.2016.1 Burnett, 2007, Erectile function outcome reporting after clinically localized prostate cancer treatment, J Urol, 178, 597 Teloken, 2007, The correlation between erectile function and patient satisfaction, J Sex Med, 4, 472 Briganti, 2011, What is the definition of a satisfactory erectile function after bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy?, J Sex Med, 8, 1210 Rossi, 2016, Erectile function recovery after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: is back to baseline status enough for patient satisfaction?, J Sex Med, 13, 669 Moskovic, 2010, The female factor: predicting compliance with a post-prostatectomy erectile preservation program, J Sex Med, 7, 3659 Salonia, 2009, Unsuccessful investigation of preoperative sexual health issues in the prostate cancer “couple”: results of a real-life psychometric survey at a major tertiary academic center, J Sex Med, 6, 3347 Wittmann, 2015, What couples say about their recovery of sexual intimacy after prostatectomy: toward the development of a conceptual model of couples’ sexual recovery after surgery for prostate cancer, J Sex Med, 12, 494 Tal, 2009, Erectile function recovery rate after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis, J Sex Med, 6, 2538 Yaxley, 2016, Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study, Lancet, 388, 1057, 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30592-X Dubbelman, 2006, Sexual function before and after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a systematic review of prognostic indicators for a successful outcome, Eur Urol, 50, 711, 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.06.009 Ficarra, 2009, Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies, Eur Urol, 55, 1037, 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.036 Tewari, 2003, Members of the VIPT. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution, BJU Int, 92, 205, 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04311.x Haglind, 2015, Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction after robotic versus open radical prostatectomy: a prospective, controlled, nonrandomised trial, Eur Urol, 68, 216, 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.029 Asimakopoulos, 2011, Randomized comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy, J Sex Med, 8, 1503 Di Pierro, 2011, A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload, Eur Urol, 59, 1, 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.10.026 Ficarra, 2009, A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution, BJU Int, 104, 534, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08419.x Stolzenburg, 2015, Effect of surgical approach on erectile function recovery following bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: an evaluation utilising data from a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy multicentre trial of tadalafil vs placebo, BJU Int, 116, 241, 10.1111/bju.13030 O’Neil, 2016, The comparative harms of open and robotic prostatectomy in population based samples, J Urol, 195, 321 Alemozaffar, 2015, Benchmarks for operative outcomes of robotic and open radical prostatectomy: results from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, Eur Urol, 67, 432, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.039 Ong, 2016, Comparison of oncological and health related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes between open (ORP) and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for localized prostate cancer—findings from the population-based Victorian Prostate Cancer Registry (PCR), BJU Int, 118, 563, 10.1111/bju.13380 Magheli, 2014, Comparison of surgical technique (open vs. laparoscopic) on pathological and long term functional outcomes following radical prostatectomy, BMC Urol, 14, 18, 10.1186/1471-2490-14-18 Recabal, 2016, Erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy in men with high risk features, J Urol, 196, 507 Gandaglia, 2014, A systematic review of the association between erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular disease, Eur Urol, 65, 968, 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.023 Salonia, 2012, Is erectile dysfunction a reliable proxy of general male health status? The case for the International Index of Erectile Function–Erectile Function domain, J Sex Med, 9, 2708 Rabbani, 2000, Factors predicting recovery of erections after radical prostatectomy, J Urol, 164, 1929 Penson, 2008, 5-year urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy: results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study, J Urol, 179, S40 Becker, 2014, Functional and oncological outcomes of patients aged < 50 years treated with radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer in a European population, BJU Int, 114, 38, 10.1111/bju.12407 Kumar, 2015, Age stratified comparative analysis of perioperative, functional and oncologic outcomes in patients after robot assisted radical prostatectomy—a propensity score matched study, Eur J Surg Oncol, 41, 837, 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.04.006 Salomon, 2009, Importance of baseline potency rate assessment of men diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer prior to radical prostatectomy, J Sex Med, 6, 498 Teloken, 2013, Defining the impact of vascular risk factors on erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy, BJU Int, 111, 653, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11321.x Briganti, 2010, Predicting erectile function recovery after bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: a proposal of a novel preoperative risk stratification, J Sex Med, 7, 2521 Novara, 2010, Preoperative criteria to select patients for bilateral nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, J Sex Med, 7, 839 Kim, 2012, Optimal timing to evaluate prediagnostic baseline erectile function in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, J Sex Med, 9, 602 Deveci, 2015, A survey of patient expectations regarding sexual function following radical prostatectomy, BJU Int, 118, 641, 10.1111/bju.13398 Gandaglia, 2014, How to optimize patient selection for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: functional outcome analyses from a tertiary referral center, J Endourol, 28, 792, 10.1089/end.2014.0007 Harris, 2013, Men with low preoperative sexual function may benefit from nerve sparing radical prostatectomy, J Urol, 190, 981 Yafi, 2016, Erectile dysfunction, Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2, 16003, 10.1038/nrdp.2016.3 Hatzimouratidis, 2016, Pharmacotherapy for erectile dysfunction: recommendations from the Fourth International Consultation for Sexual Medicine (ICSM 2015), J Sex Med, 13, 465 Walsh, 2007, The discovery of the cavernous nerves and development of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy, J Urol, 177, 1632 Moreland, 1998, Is there a role of hypoxemia in penile fibrosis: a viewpoint presented to the Society for the Study of Impotence, Int J Impot Res, 10, 113, 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900328 Weyne, 2015, Molecular pathophysiology of cavernous nerve injury and identification of strategies for nerve function recovery after radical prostatectomy, Curr Drug Targets, 16, 459, 10.2174/1389450116666150316224456 Bilhim, 2012, Prostatic arterial supply: anatomic and imaging findings relevant for selective arterial embolization, J Vasc Interv Radiol, 23, 1403, 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.07.028 Patel, 2012, The role of the prostatic vasculature as a landmark for nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 61, 571, 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.047 Box, 2010, Sacrifice of accessory pudendal arteries in normally potent men during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy does not impact potency, J Sex Med, 7, 298 John, 2000, Seminal vesicle-sparing radical prostatectomy: a novel concept to restore early urinary continence, Urology, 55, 820, 10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00547-1 Alsaid, 2011, Division of autonomic nerves within the neurovascular bundles distally into corpora cavernosa and corpus spongiosum components: immunohistochemical confirmation with three-dimensional reconstruction, Eur Urol, 59, 902, 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.02.031 Costello, 2004, Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves, BJU Int, 94, 1071, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05106.x Ganzer, 2012, Anatomic study of periprostatic nerve distribution: immunohistochemical differentiation of parasympathetic and sympathetic nerve fibres, Eur Urol, 62, 1150, 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.039 Tewari, 2011, Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), BJU Int, 108, 984, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10565.x Tewari, 2013, Functional outcomes following robotic prostatectomy using athermal, traction free risk-stratified grades of nerve sparing, World J Urol, 31, 471, 10.1007/s00345-012-1018-7 Schatloff, 2012, Anatomic grading of nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 61, 796, 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.048 Skeldon, 2014, Do patients know their nerve-sparing status after radical prostatectomy?, Urology, 83, 1099, 10.1016/j.urology.2014.01.030 Imbimbo, 2011, Patients’ desire to preserve sexual activity and final decision for a nerve-sparing approach: results from the MIRROR (Multicenter Italian Report on Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes and Research) study, J Sex Med, 8, 1495 van der Poel, 2012, Extended nodal dissection reduces sexual function recovery after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, J Endourol, 26, 1192, 10.1089/end.2012.0011 Gandaglia, 2012, Extended pelvic lymph node dissection does not affect erectile function recovery in patients treated with bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy, J Sex Med, 9, 2187 Hatzichristodoulou, 2016, Extended versus limited pelvic lymph node dissection during bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy and its effect on continence and erectile function recovery: long-term results and trifecta rates of a comparative analysis, World J Urol, 34, 811, 10.1007/s00345-015-1699-9