Forecasting for dynamic line rating

CIGRE. Thermal behaviour of overhead conductors; 2002. Ackermann, 2005, vol. 140 Strbac, 2008, Demand side management: Benefits and challenges, Energy Policy, 36, 4419, 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.030 Zugno, 2013, Impact of wind power generation on European cross-border power flows, IEEE Trans Power Syst, 28, 3566, 10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2259850 Orfanos, 2013, Transmission expansion planning of systems with increasing wind power integration, IEEE Trans Power Syst, 28, 1355, 10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2214242 De la Torre, 2008, Transmission expansion planning in electricity markets, IEEE Trans Power Syst, 23, 238, 10.1109/TPWRS.2007.913717 Pytlak P, Musilek P, Doucet J. Using dynamic thermal rating systems to reduce power generation emissions. In: Proceedings of IEEE power and energy society general meeting; 2011. p. 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/pes.2011.6039401. Hall, 1988, Prediction of overhead transmission line ampacity by stochastic and deterministic models, IEEE Trans Power Deliv, 3, 789, 10.1109/61.4319 Douglass, 1988, Weather-dependent versus static thermal line ratings [power overhead lines], IEEE Trans Power Deliv, 3, 742, 10.1109/61.4313 Foss, 1992, Evaluation of an overhead line forecast rating algorithm, IEEE Trans Power Deliv, 7, 1618, 10.1109/61.141882 House, 1958, Current-carrying capacity of acsr, Electr Eng, 77, 719, 10.1109/EE.1958.6445265 Morgan, 1967, Rating of bare overhead conductors for continuous currents, Proc Inst Electr Eng, 114, 1473, 10.1049/piee.1967.0284 Morgan, 1969, Rating of bare overhead conductors for intermittent and cyclic currents, Proc Inst Electr Eng, 116, 1361, 10.1049/piee.1969.0250 Davidson, 1969, Short-time thermal ratings for bare overhead conductors, IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst, PAS-88, 194, 10.1109/TPAS.1969.292306 IEEE. IEEE standard for calculating the current–temperature of bare overhead conductors; 2006. Davis, 1977, A new thermal rating approach: the real time thermal rating system for strategic overhead conductor transmission lines — Part I: general description and justification of the real time thermal rating system, IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst, 96, 803, 10.1109/T-PAS.1977.32393 Davis, 1977, A new thermal rating approach: the real time thermal rating system for strategic overhead conductor transmission lines — Part II: steady state thermal rating program, IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst, 96, 810, 10.1109/T-PAS.1977.32394 Davis, 1978, A new thermal rating approach: the real time thermal rating system for strategic overhead conductor transmission lines Part III steady state thermal rating program continued-solar radiation considerations, IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst, PAS-97, 444, 10.1109/TPAS.1978.354504 Davis, 1980, A new thermal rating approach: the real time thermal rating system for strategic overhead conductor transmission lines Part IV daily comparisons of real-time and conventional thermal rating and establishment of typical annual weather models, IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst, PAS-99, 2184, 10.1109/TPAS.1980.319781 Davis, 1980, IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst, PAS-99, 2193, 10.1109/TPAS.1980.319782 Foss, 1983, Dynamic thermal line ratings, Part I – dynamic ampacity rating algorithm, IEEE Power Eng Rev, PER-3, 18 Foss, 1983, Dynamic thermal line ratings, Part II – conductor temperature sensor and laboratory field test evaluation, IEEE Power Eng Rev, PER-3, 18 Foss, 1990, Dynamic line rating in the operating environment, IEEE Trans Power Deliv, 5, 1095, 10.1109/61.53127 Fernandes RA, Smith-Vaniz WR. System and apparatus for monitoring and control of a bulk electric power delivery system; 1987. Callahan, 1988, An experimental evaluation of a thermal line uprating by conductor temperature and weather monitoring, IEEE Trans Power Deliv, 3, 1960, 10.1109/61.194006 Douglass, 1996, Real-time monitoring and dynamic thermal rating of power transmission circuits, IEEE Trans Power Deliv, 11, 1407, 10.1109/61.517499 Douglass DA, Edris A. Field studies of dynamic thermal rating methods for overhead lines. In: Proceedings of the transmission and distribution conference, 1999 IEEE, vol. 2; 1999. p. 842–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tdc.1999.756160. Douglass, 2000, Dynamic thermal ratings realize circuit load limits, IEEE Comput Appl Power, 13, 38, 10.1109/67.814665 Seppa, 1993, A practical approach for increasing the thermal capabilities of transmission lines, IEEE Trans Power Deliv, 8, 1536, 10.1109/61.252680 Seppa, 1995, Accurate ampacity determination: temperature-sag model for operational real time ratings, IEEE Trans Power Deliv, 10, 1460, 10.1109/61.400930 Seppa T, Clements M, Payne R, Damsgaard-Mikkelsen S, Coad N. Application of real time thermal ratings for optimizing transmission line investment and operating decisions. In: Proceedings of CIGRE meeting; 2000, p. 27–2. Seppa TO. Power transmission line tension monitoring system; 1996. Deb AK. Object oriented expert power line ampacity system; 1999. Mensah-Bonsu, 2002, Application of the global positioning system to the measurement of overhead power transmission conductor sag, IEEE Trans Power Deliv, 17, 273, 10.1109/61.974218 Mensah-Bonsu, 2003, Real-time digital processing of GPS measurements for transmission engineering, IEEE Trans Power Deliv, 18, 177, 10.1109/TPWRD.2002.803803 Mai R, Fu L, Xu H. Dynamic Line Rating estimator with synchronized phasor measurement. In: Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on advanced power system automation and protection (APAP), vol. 2; 2011. p. 940–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/apap.2011.6180545. Yan D, Yuan L. Online estimation of power transmission line parameters, temperature and sag. In: Proceedings of the North American power symposium (NAPS); 2011. p. 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/naps.2011.6024854. Grightmire AR, Julian D, Nuqui RF, Scholtz E. Real-time power-line sag monitoring using time-synchronized power system measurements; 2009. Cloet E, Lilien J-L, Ferrières P. Experiences of the Belgian and French TSOs using the “Ampacimon” real-time dynamic rating system. In: In: Proceedings of the Conférence Internationale des grands réseaux électriques à haute tension; 2010. Lilien J-L. Destine J. Device, system and method for real-time monitoring of overhead power lines; 2007. Soto, 1998, Increasing the capacity of overhead lines in the 400kV spanish transmission network: real time thermal ratings, Electra, 22, 1 Nuijten JMA, Geschiere A, Smit JC, Frijmersum GJ. Future network planning and grid control. In: Proceedings of the 2005 international conference on future power systems; 2005. p. 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/naps.2011.602485410.1109/fps.2005.204303. Michiorri A, Currie R, Taylor P, Watson F, MacLeman D. Dynamic line ratings deployment on the Orkney Smart Grid. CIRED. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on electricity distribution, Frankfurt, 6–9 June 2011; 2011. Roberts D, Taylor P, Michiorri A. Dynamic thermal rating for increasing network capacity and delaying network reinforcements. In: Proceedings of the SmartGrids for Distribution, 2008. IET-CIRED. CIRED Seminar, IET; 2008. p. 1–4. Michiorri, 2009, Investigation into the influence of environmental conditions on power system ratings, Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A—J Power Energy, 223, 743, 10.1243/09576509JPE718 Michiorri, 2010, Overhead line real-time rating estimation algorithm: description and validation, Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A—J Power Energy, 224, 293, 10.1243/09576509JPE859 Cunningham J, Colandairaj J. Methodology for applying real-time ratings to wood pole supported overhead lines. In: Proceedings of the 44th international universities power engineering conference (UPEC); 2009. p. 1–5. Schell P, Godard B, Lilien J-L, Nguyen H-M, De Wilde V, Durieux O, et al. Large penetration of distributed productions: Dynamic line rating and flexible generation, a must regarding investment strategy and network reliability. In: Proceedings of the integration of renewables into the distribution grid, CIRED 2012 workshop, IET; 2012. p. 1–5. Boyse, 1944, The problem of conductor sagging on overhead transmission lines, J Inst Electr Eng – Part II: Power Eng, 91, 219 Kiessling, 2003 Nguyen H-M. Real-time monitoring and dynamic line rating forecast of overhead power lines using a vibration sensor. University of Liège; 2015 [submitted for publication]. Guide for selection of weather parameters for bare overhead conductor ratings. In: Proceedings of CIGRE; 2006. Vincent, 2010, Resolving nonstationary spectral information in wind speed time series using the Hilbert–Huang transform, J Appl Meteor Climatol, 49, 253, 10.1175/2009JAMC2058.1 Simiu, 1996 CIGRE. Sag-tension calculation methods for overhead lines; 2007. Seppa, 1993, Summer thermal capabilities of transmission lines in Northern California based on a comprehensive study of wind conditions, IEEE Trans Power Deliv, 8, 1551, 10.1109/61.252681 Chisholm, 1989, Ampacity studies on 49 C-rated transmission line, IEEE Trans Power Deliv, 4, 1476, 10.1109/61.25635 Pytlak P, Musilek P, Lozowski E. Precipitation-based conductor cooling model for dynamic thermal rating systems. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE electrical power & energy conference (EPEC). IEEE; 2009. p. 1–7. Pytlak, 2011, Modelling precipitation cooling of overhead conductors, Electr Power Syst Res, 81, 2147, 10.1016/j.epsr.2011.06.004 Holton, 2012 Troccoli A, Dubus L, Haupt SE. Weather Matters for Energy; n.d. Papalexopoulos, 1990, A regression-based approach to short-term system load forecasting, IEEE Trans Power Syst, 5, 1535, 10.1109/59.99410 Taylor, 2002, Neural network load forecasting with weather ensemble predictions, IEEE Trans Power Syst, 17, 626, 10.1109/TPWRS.2002.800906 Pinson, 2013, Wind energy: forecasting challenges for its operational management, Stat Sci, 28, 564, 10.1214/13-STS445 Hong, 2014, Energy forecasting: past, present, and future, Foresight: Int J Appl Forecast, 43 Knüpffer K. High resolution MOS forecasts based on a low resolution model. In: Proceedings of 9th European conference on applications of meteorology (ECAM), 9th EMS annual meeting, Abstracts, Sept. 28–Oct. 2, 2009, Toulouse, France, id. EMS2009-456, vol. 1; 2009. p. 456. 〈http://meetings.copernicus.org/ems2009/〉. Ferrero, 2006, Nonlocal treatment of the buoyancy-shear-driven boundary layer, J Atmos Sci, 63 Ferrero, 2009, Non-local simulation of the stable boundary layer with a third order moments closure model, J Mar Syst, 77, 495, 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.11.013 Ferrero, 2004, The role of the nonlocal transport in modeling the shear-driven atmospheric boundary layer, J Atmos Sci, 61 Mortarini, 2013, Low frequency processes and turbulence structure in a perturbed boundary layer, Q J R Meteorol Soc, 139, 1059, 10.1002/qj.2015 Marjanovic, 2011 Bechmann A. Large-eddy simulation of atmospheric flow over complex, vol. 10; 2006. Meissner C, Gravdahl A, Wu X. Short-term forecasting using mesoscale simulations, neural networks and CFD simulations. In: Proceedings of the EWEA 2012 Annual Event, Copenhagen; 2012. Frey-Buness, 1995, A statistical–dynamical downscaling procedure for global climate simulations, Theor Appl Climatol, 50, 117, 10.1007/BF00866111 Smith, 1992, Low wind-speed meteorology, Meteorol Mag, 121, 141 Goulart, 2007, Theoretical considerations of meandering winds in simplified conditions, Bound-Layer Meteorol, 125, 279, 10.1007/s10546-007-9179-4 Oettl, 2005, A new hypothesis on meandering atmospheric flows in low wind speed conditions, Atmos Environ, 39, 1739 Anfossi, 2005, An analysis of sonic anemometer observations in low wind speed conditions, Bound-Layer Meteorol, 114, 179, 10.1007/s10546-004-1984-4 Pahlow, 2001, On Monin–Obukhov similarity in the stable atmospheric boundary layer, Bound-Layer Meteorol, 99, 225, 10.1023/A:1018909000098 Webster HN, Thomson DJ. Parameterising low-frequency meander in atmospheric dispersion models. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on harmonisation within atmospheric dispersion modelling for regulatory purposes; 2005. p. 594–8. Lorenz, 1963, Deterministic nonperiodic flow, J Atmos Sci, 20, 130, 10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2 Lorenz, 1984, 1 Lorenz, 1969, The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion, Tellus, 21, 289, 10.3402/tellusa.v21i3.10086 Buizza, 2003, Assessment of the status of global ensemble prediction, Mon Weather Rev, 133, 1076, 10.1175/MWR2905.1 Zhu Y. Probabilistic forecasts and evaluations based on a global ensemble prediction system. Observation, Theory, and Modeling of Atmospheric Variability World Scientific Series on Meteorology of East Asia; 2004. p. 277–87. Zhu, 2005, Ensemble forecast: a new approach to uncertainty and predictability, Adv Atmos Sci, 22, 781, 10.1007/BF02918678 Miller, 2010, Increased resolution in the ECMWF deterministic and ensemble prediction systems Seven years of activity in the field of mesoscale ensemble forecasting by the COSMO-LEPS system: main achievements and open challenges, Tellus A, 63, 605 Alessandrini, 2013, A comparison between the ECMWF and COSMO ensemble prediction systems applied to short-term wind power forecasting on real data, Appl Energy, 107, 271, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.041 Møller, 2008, Time-adaptive quantile regression, Comput Stat Data Anal, 52, 1292, 10.1016/j.csda.2007.06.027 Nguyen H-M. Latest results in forecasting and DLR related to twenties and other projects; 2013. Michiorri A, Currie R, McLorn G, Foote C. An assessment of the economic impact of active network management techniques. In: Proceedings of CIRED 21st international conference on electricity distribution; 2011. Uski, 2015, Estimation method for dynamic line rating potential and economic benefits, Int J Electr Power Energy Syst, 76, 10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.09.034 Khaki M, Musilek P, Heckenbergerova J, Koval D. Electric power system cost/loss optimization using dynamic thermal rating and linear programming. In: Proceedings of IEEE; 2010. p. 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EPEC.2010.5697195. Barth, 2006, Regional electricity price differences due to intermittent wind power in Germany: impact of extended transmission and storage capacities, Int J Glob Energy Issues, 25, 276, 10.1504/IJGEI.2006.008996 Leuthold, 2008, Efficient pricing for European electricity networks—the theory of nodal pricing applied to feeding-in wind in Germany, Utilities Policy, 16, 284, 10.1016/j.jup.2007.12.003 Belben P, Ziesler C. Aeolian uprating: how wind farms can solve their own transmission problems. In: Proceedings of the world wind energy conference and exhibition, Berlin; 2002. Nguyen H-M, Lambin J-J, Vassort F, Lilien J-L. Operational experience with Dynamic Line Rating forecast-based solutions to increase usable network transfer capacity; 2014. Xu B, Ulbig A, Andersson G. Impacts of dynamic line rating on power dispatch performance and grid integration of renewable energy sources. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 4th IEEE/PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT EUROPE); 2013, p. 1–5. CIGRE. Guide for application of direct real-time monitoring systems; 2012.