Sensitivity of the carbon footprint of New Zealand milk to greenhouse gas metrics

Allen, 2016, New use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants, Nat. Clim. Change, 6, 773, 10.1038/nclimate2998 Basset-Mens, 2009, Uncertainty of global warming potential for milk production on a New Zealand farm and implications for decision making, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 14, 630, 10.1007/s11367-009-0108-2 Basset-Mens, 2009, Eco-efficiency of intensification scenarios for milk production in New Zealand, Ecol. Econ., 68, 1615, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.017 Cherubini, 2016, Bridging the gap between impact assessment methods and climate science, Environ. Sci. Policy, 64, 129, 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.019 Chobtang, 2016, Life cycle environmental impacts of high and low intensification pasture-based milk production systems: a case study of the Waikato region, New Zealand, J. Clean. Prod. Adv. Online Clark, 2003 Clark, 2001 Flysjö, 2011, The impact of various parameters on the carbon footprint of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden, Agric. Syst., 104, 459, 10.1016/j.agsy.2011.03.003 Forster, 2007, Changes in atmospheric constituents and radiative forcing Gerber, 2011, Productivity gains and greenhouse gas emissions intensity in dairy systems, Livest. Sci., 139, 100, 10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.012 Guigue, 2014 Hedley, 2006, Achieving high profit from your farm system, Proceedings of the Dairy3 Conference, 167 Hutchings, 2009, Drivers, methods, results and challenges – Fonterra carbon footprint study IDF, 2015. A common carbon footprint approach for the dairy sector: the IDF guide to standard lifecycle assessment methodology. Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation 479/2015, Brussels, Belgium. pp60. IPCC, 2006. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland. IPCC, 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, et al. (eds). Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK. IPCC, 2009. Meeting Report of the Expert Meeting on the Science of Alternative Metrics. Plattner G-K, Stocker TF, Midgley P et al. (eds). IPCC WGI Technical Support Unit, Bern, Switzerland, pp75. IPCC, 2013. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, et al. (ed) Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK, and New York, USA. IPCC, 2014a. Climate Change 2013: Mitigation Edenhofer O, Ramón Pichs-Madruga, Youba Sokona et al. (eds) Climate Change 2014: Mitigation. Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK. IPCC, 2014b. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Meyer LA (ed) Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK, and New York, USA. ISO, 2006, ISO 14044: Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland. Ledgard, 2015 Ledgard, 2014, Implications of alternative greenhouse gas metrics for life cycle assessments of livestock food products Ledgard, 2008 Ledgard, 2011 Ledgard, 2011, Carbon footprinting of New Zealand lamb from the perspective of an exporting nation, Anim. Front., 1, 40, 10.2527/af.2011-0010 Levasseur, 2016, Enhancing life cycle impact assessment from climate science: review of recent findings and recommendations for application to LCA, Ecol. Indic., 71, 163, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.049 Manne, 2001, An alternative approach to establishing trade-offs among greenhouse gases, Nature, 410, 675, 10.1038/35070541 Manning, 2011, Broader perspectives for comparing different greenhouse gases, Proc. R. Soc. A, 369, 1891, 10.1098/rsta.2010.0349 MfE, 2016. New Zealand’s Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990–2014. Report submitted to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington. pp408. Myhre, 2013, Chapter 8: anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing Persson, 2015, Climate metrics and the carbon footprint of livestock products: where’s the beef?, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 034005, 10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/034005 Reisinger, 2013, Impact of greenhouse gas metrics on the quantification of agricultural emissions and farm-scale mitigation strategies: a New Zealand case study, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 025019, 10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/025019 Shine, 2005, Alternatives to the global warming potential for comparing climate impacts of emissions of greenhouse gases, Clim. Change, 68, 281, 10.1007/s10584-005-1146-9 Shine, 2007, Comparing the climate effect of emissions of short- and long-lived climate agents, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A, 365, 1903, 10.1098/rsta.2007.2050 Shine, 2009, The global warming potential—the need for an interdisciplinary retrial, Clim. Change, 96, 467, 10.1007/s10584-009-9647-6 Smith, 2000, Global warming potentials: 1. Climatic implications of emissions reductions, Clim. Change, 44, 445, 10.1023/A:1005584914078 Tanaka, 2013, Emission metrics under the 2 (C climate stabilization target, Clim. Change, 117, 933, 10.1007/s10584-013-0693-8 UNFCCC, 2015. Adoption of the Paris Agreement. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1. United Nations Convention on Climate Change, Bonn, Germany. pp39. Weidema, 2013