Surgical Treatment of Gynecomastia with Severe Ptosis: Periareolar Incision and Dermal Double Areolar Pedicle Technique

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 33 - Trang 834-837 - 2008
Claudio Cannistra1, Andrea Piedimonte1, Fiorella Albonico1
1Department of General Surgery, Plastic Surgery Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bichat Claude Bernard, Paris, France

Tóm tắt

Gynecomastia is a morphostructural impairment of the mammary region in men caused by parenchymal hypertrophy or a cutaneous distortion of breast skin covering or both. The clinical classification introduced by Simon et al. in 1973 ranks gynecomastia in three degrees. Each subtype can be treated with a specific technique. This article describes an alternative surgical procedure for treating gynecomastia with severe ptosis (type III and type IIIb of Simon’s classification). Fifty-eight patients were treated for gynecomastia in our Plastic Surgery Unit from 1996 to 2004. The cutaneous excess of periareolar skin is evaluated by a pinching test. A circular periareolar mark is traced corresponding to the cutaneous excess that has to be removed. Initially, liposuction of adipous tissue on the periphery of the mammary region is performed through two cutaneous 3-mm incisions at the 3 o’clock and 9 o’clock positions around the areola. After this, the liposuction incisions are enlarged from 10 o’clock to 8 o’clock and from 2 o’clock to 4 o’clock to create access for the mastectomy. This dissection creates a double dermal areolar pedicle. The new areolar position is fixed with a Benelli round block suture. A resolution of the morphologic deformity without evident scars after hair growth and a correction of the breast deformity has been observed in the 6-month follow-ups conducted for all the patients. We observed that the vascular-nervous net under the areola at 12 o’clock and 6 o’clock is very important, more so than the lateral pedicle, and the conservation of a double vascular-nervous pedicle reduces significantly the risk of areolar necrosis, especially in cases of gynecomastia type III and in cases where there is a high degree of breast malformation such as the tuberous breast.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Braustein GD (1993) Current concepts: gynecomastia. N Engl J Med 328:490–495 Williams MJ (1963) Gynecomastia: its incidence, recognition and host characterization in 447 autopsy cases. Am J Med 34:103–106 Simon BE, Hoffman S, Kahan S (1973) Classification and surgical correction for gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 51:48–52 Pitanguy I (1966) Transareolar incision for gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 38:414–418 Walden J, Schmid RP, Blackwell SJ (2004) Cross chest lipoplasty and surgical excision for gynecomastia: a 10 year experience. Aesthetic Surg J 24:216–233 Persichetti P, Berloco M, Casadei RM, Maragni GF, Di Lella F, Nobili AM (2001) Gynecomastia and the complete circumareolar approach in the surgical management of skin redundancy. Plast Reconstr Surg 107(4):948–953 Botta SA (1998) Alternatives for surgical correction of severe gynecomastia. Aesth Plast Surg 22:65–70 Vasseur C, Martinot V, Hodin E, Patenotre P, Pellerin P (1998) Gynecomastia. Management of diagnosis and therapy. Apropos of 52 cases. Ann Chir 52(2):146–157 (in French) Filho DH, Arruda RG, Alonso N (2006) Treatment of severe gynecomastia (grade III) by resection of periareolar skin. Aesthetic Surg J 26(6):669–673 Davidson BA (1979) Concentric circle operation for massive gynecomastia to excise the redundant skin. Plast Reconstr Surg 63(3):350–353 Courtiss EH (1987) Gynecomastia: analysis of 159 patients and current recommendations for treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 79:740–749 Rosenberg GJ (1987) Gynecomastia: suction lipectomy as a contemporary solution. Plast Reconstr Surg 80:379–385