Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions

Anas, 1983, Discrete choice theory, information theory and the multinomial logit and gravity models, Transportation Research B, 17, 13, 10.1016/0191-2615(83)90023-1 AVV, 2000. NVVP beleidsopties verkend [the National Traffic and Transport Policy options explored]. AVV Transport Research Centre, Rotterdam Banister, 2000 Bateman, 2002 Bates, 2001, Reliability––The missing model variable, 527 Ben-Akiva, 1979, Disaggregate travel and mobility choice models and measures of accessibility, 654 Ben-Akiva, 1985 Bhat, 1999, Activity-based modelling of travel demand Black, 1977, Accessibility measures and the social evaluation of urban structure, Environment and Planning A, 9, 1013, 10.1068/a091013 Blayac, 2001, Value of travel time: a theoretical legitimization of some nonlinear representative utility in discrete choice models, Transportation Research B, 35, 391, 10.1016/S0191-2615(99)00056-9 Boardman, 2001 Breheny, 1978, The measurement of spatial opportunity in strategic planning, Regional Studies, 12, 463, 10.1080/09595237800185401 Bristow, A.L., Hopkinson, P.G., Nash, C.A., Wardman, M., 1990. Evaluation of the use and non-use benefits of public transport. In: PTRC 18th Summer Annual Meeting, University of Sussex, September 10–14, P335, pp. 1–18 Bruinsma, 1998, The accessibility of European cities; theoretical framework and comparison of approached, Environment and Planning A, 30, 499, 10.1068/a300499 Burns, 1979 Cervero, R., Rood, T., Appleyard, B., 1997. Job accessibility as a performance indicator: An analysis of trends and their social policy implications in the San Francisco Bay Area. Working paper 692, University of California, Berkeley Dalvi, 1976, The measurement of accessibility: some preliminary results, Transportation, 5, 17, 10.1007/BF00165245 DETR, 2000. Transport 2010. The background analysis. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London DfT, 2000. Guidance on the Methodology for Multi-Modal Studies. Vol. 1/2. Department for Transport, London. Available from <www.dft.gov.uk/itwp/mms/vol1/01.htm> Dijst, 1997, Individual action space in the city, 117 DSC/ME&P, 1999. Review of land-use/transport interaction models. Reports to The Standing Advisory Committee on Trunk Road Assessment. David Simmonds Consultancy/Marcial Echenique and Partners, London. Ettema, 1997 Ewing, 1993, Transportation service standards––as if people matter, Transportation Research Record, 1400, 10 Forckenbrock, D.J., Weisbrod, G.E., 2001. Guidebook for assessing the social and economic effects of transportation projects. National Cooperative Highway Research Program. University of Iowa, Iowa City Fürst, F., Schürmann, C., Spiekermann, K., Wegener, M., 2000. The SASI model: demonstration Examples. Deliverable D15. Berichte aus den Insititut für Raumplanung 51, Universität Dortmund, Insititut für Raumplanung, Dortmund Geurs, K.T., Ritsema van Eck, J.R., 2001. Accessibility measures: review and applications. RIVM report 408505 006, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven. Available from <www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/408505006.html> Geurs, 2003, Accessibility evaluation of land-use scenarios: the impact of job competition land-use and infrastructure developments for the Netherlands, Environment and Planning B, 30, 69, 10.1068/b12940 Gutiérrez, 1996, Accessibility in the European Union: the impact of the Trans-European road network, Journal of Transport Geography, 4, 15, 10.1016/0966-6923(95)00042-9 Guy, 1983, The assessment of access to local shopping opportunities: a comparison of accessibility measures, Environment and Planning B, 10, 219, 10.1068/b100219 Hägerstrand, 1970, What about people in regional science?, People of the Regional Science Association, 24, 7, 10.1111/j.1435-5597.1970.tb01464.x Handy, 1994, Regional versus local accessibility: implications for non-work travel, Transportation Research Record, 1400, 58 Handy, 1997, Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives, Environment and Planning A, 29, 1175, 10.1068/a291175 Hansen, 1959, How accessibility shapes land use, Journal of American Institute of Planners, 25, 73, 10.1080/01944365908978307 Ingram, 1971, The concept of accessibility: a search for an operational form, Regional Studies, 5, 101, 10.1080/09595237100185131 Jones, S.R., 1981. Accessibility measures: a literature review. TRRL Report 967, Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berkshire Joseph, 1982, Measuring potential physical accessibility to general practitioners in rural areas: a method and case study, Social Science and Medicine, 16, 85, 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90428-2 Knox, 1978, The intraurban ecology of primary medical care: patterns of accessibility and their policy implications, Environment and Planning A, 10, 415, 10.1068/a100415 Koenig, 1980, Indicators of urban accessibility: theory and applications, Transportation, 9, 145, 10.1007/BF00167128 Kwan, 1998, Space–time and integral measures of individual accessibility: a comparative analysis using a point-based framework, Geographical Analysis, 30, 191, 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1998.tb00396.x Leonardi, 1978, Optimum facility location by accessibility maximising, Environment and Planning A, 10, 1287, 10.1068/a101287 Levine, 1998, Rethinking accessibility and jobs-housing balance, Journal of American Planning Association, 64, 12, 10.1080/01944369808975972 Linneker, 1992, Accessibility measures compared in an analysis of the impact of the M25 London orbital motorway on Britain, Environment and Planning A, 24, 1137, 10.1068/a241137 LOIS, 2003. Home page of the London to Ipswich Multi Modal Study. Available from <http://212.67.202.71/~loismms/> Martı́nez, 1995, Access: the transport-land use economic link, Transportation Research Part B, 29, 457, 10.1016/0191-2615(95)00014-5 Martı́nez, 2000, A note on trip benefits in spatial interaction models, Journal of Regional Science, 40, 789, 10.1111/0022-4146.00199 McFadden, 2001, Disaggregate behavioural travel demand's RUM side: a 30-year retrospective, 17 McNally, 2000, The activity-based approach, 53 Miller, 1991, Modelling accessibility using space–time prism concepts within geographical information systems, International Journal of Geographical Systems, 5, 287, 10.1080/02693799108927856 Miller, 1999, Measuring space–time accessibility benefits within transportation networks: basic theory and computational procedures, Geographical Analysis, 31, 187, 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1999.tb00976.x Neuburger, 1971, User benefits in the evaluation of transport and land-use plans, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 5, 52 Niemeier, 1997, Accessibility: an evaluation using consumer welfare, Transportation, 24, 377, 10.1023/A:1004914803019 Pirie, 1979, Measuring accessibility: a review and proposal, Environment and Planning A, 11, 299, 10.1068/a110299 Pirie, 1981, The possibility and potential of public policy on accessibility, Transportation Research A, 15, 377, 10.1016/0191-2607(81)90143-6 Recker, 2001, Measuring the impact of efficient household travel decisions on potential travel time savings and accessibility gains, Transportation Research A, 35, 339 Redmond, 2001, The positive utility of the commute: modeling ideal commute time and relative desired commute amount, Transportation, 28, 179, 10.1023/A:1010366321778 Rietveld, 1998 Roson, 2001, Assessing the option value of a publicly provided service: the case of local transport, Urban studies, 38, 1319, 10.1080/00420980120061043 Shen, 1998, Location characteristics of inner-city neighbourhoods and employment accessibility of low-wage workers, Environment and Planning B, 25, 345, 10.1068/b250345 Small, 1981, Applied welfare economics with discrete choice models, Econometrica, 49, 105, 10.2307/1911129 Song, 1996, Some tests of alternative accessibility measures: a population density approach, Land Economics, 72, 474, 10.2307/3146910 Stewart, 1947, Empirical mathematical rules concerning the distribution and equilibrium of population, Geography Review, 37, 461, 10.2307/211132 Sweet, 1997, An aggregate measure of travel utility, Transportation Research B, 31, 403, 10.1016/S0191-2615(97)00004-0 Thill, 1997, Travel time contraints in destination choice sets, Geographical Analysis, 29, 108, 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1997.tb00951.x Tressider, 1968, The London transportation study, Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers, 39, 433, 10.1680/iicep.1968.8074 Van Wee, 2001, Accessibility measures with competition, Journal of Transport geography, 9, 199, 10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00010-2 Veldhuisen, 2000, RAMBLAS: a regional planning model based on the microsimulation of daily activity travel patterns, Environment and Planning A, 32, 427, 10.1068/a325 Vickerman, 1974, Accessibility, attraction, and potential: a review of some concepts and their use in determining mobility, Environment and Planning A, 6, 675, 10.1068/a060675 Wachs, 1973, Physical accessibility as a social indicator, Socio-Economic Planning Science, 6, 357 Waddell, 2001, Towards a behavioural integration of land use and transportation modelling, 65 Wegener, M., Fürst, F., 1999. Land-use transport interaction: state of the art. Deliverable D2a of the project TRANSLAND. Berichte aus den Insititut für Raumplanung 46, Universität Dortmund, Insititut für Raumplanung, Dortmund Weibull, 1976, An axiomatic approach to the measurement of accessibility, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 6, 357, 10.1016/0166-0462(76)90031-4 Wickstrom, 1971, Defining balanced transportation––a question of opportunity, Traffic Quarterly, 25, 337 Williams, 1976, Travel demand models, duality relations and user benefit analysis, Journal of Regional Science, 16, 147, 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1976.tb00960.x Williams, 1978, Accessibility spatial interaction and the spatial benefit analysis of land use––transportation plans Wilson, 1970 Wilson, 1971, A family of spatial interaction models, and associated developments, Environment and Planning, 3, 1, 10.1068/a030001 Wilson, 1998, Land-use/transport interaction models. Past and future, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 32, 3 Ypma, B., 2000. Internationale vergelijking van de plaats van bereikbaarheid in het verkeer- en vervoerbeleid [International comparison of the role of accessibility in transport policy]. B&A Group, The Hague