Neurosurgical invasive techniques for cancer pain: A pain specialist’s view

Current Review of Pain - Tập 3 - Trang 190-197 - 1999
Robert A. Fenstermaker1
1Department of Neurosurgery, SUNY at Buffalo School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Roswell Park Center Cancer Institute, Buffalo, USA

Tóm tắt

Neurosurgical techniques for management of cancer pain can be divided into two categories: reconstructive and ablative. For patients with pain from spinal metastatic disease, the newer surgical methods of anterior decompression and stabilization provide reliable pain control while preventing serious neurologic progression. Minimally invasive techniques for vertebral stabilization, such as vertebroplasty, may also effectively relieve pain from spinal metastases associated with low morbidity. Traditionally, stereotactic and functional neurosurgical techniques have been used to produce selective lesions in neuroanatomic pathways that mediate pain. Improvements in pharmacologic therapy, including treatment with intraspinal opioids, have led to a marked reduction in the use of ablative stereotactic methods. Nevertheless, cordotomy and certain other selectively destructive procedures still have a role in the management of patients with unremitting cancer pain. Technological developments in methods of lesion production could lead to the increased use of these methods.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Black P: Spinal metastasis: current status and recommended guidelines for management. Neurosurgery 1979, 5:726–774. Gilbert RW, Kim JH, Posner JB: Epidural spinal cord compression from metastatic tumor: diagnosis and treatment. Ann Neurol 1978, 3:40–51. Greenberg HS, Kim JH, Posner JB: Epidural spinal cord compression from metastatic tumor: results with a new treatment protocol. Ann Neurol 1980, 8:361–366. Sundaresan N, Galicich JH, Lane JM, et al.: Treatment of neoplastic epidural cord compression by vertebral body resection and stabilization. J Neurosurg 1985, 63:676–684. Graham AW 3rd, MacMillan M, Fessler RG: Lateral extracavitary approach to the thoracic and thoracolumbar spine. Orthopedics 1997, 20:605–610. This paper outlines the use of the popular lateral extracavitary technique for spinal tumors and other benign conditions. It is likely that, along with radiotherapy, such conventional surgical approaches will remain the mainstay of management for some time. However, for osteoporotic spinal compression fractures, some have advocated the use of percutaneous vertebroplasty. Harrington KD: Anterior cord compression and spinal stabilization for patients with metastatic lesions of the spine. J Neurosurg 1984, 61:107–117. McAfee PC, Regan JR, Fedder IL, et al.: Anterior thoracic corpectomy for spinal cord compression performed endoscopically. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1995, 5:339–348. Siegal T, Siegal T: Surgical decompression of anterior and posterior malignant epidural tumors compressing the spinal cord: a prospective study. Neurosurgery 1985, 17:424–432. Akeyson EW, McCutcheon IE: Single-stage posterior vertebrectomy and replacement combined with posterior instrumentation for spinal metastasis. J Neurosurg 1996, 85:211–220. Cotten A, Dewatre F, Cortet B, et al.: Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases and multiple myeloma: effects of the percentage of lesion filling and the leakage of methyl methacrylate at clinical follow-up. Radiology 1996, 200:525–530. Weill A, Chiras J, Simon JM, et al.: Spinal metastases: indications for and results of percutaneous injection of acrylic surgical cement. Radiology 1996, 199:241–247. These authors describe the successful use of vertebroplasty for spinal instability due to certain types of tumors, and they outline the results of the procedure for this specific application. Mullan S, Harper PV, Hekmatpanah J, et al.: Percutaneous interruption of spinal pain tracts by means of a strontium90 needle. J Neurosurg 1963, 20:931–939. Fenstermaker RA, Sternau L, Takaoka Y: CT-assisted percutaneous anterior cordotomy: technical note. Surg Neurol 1995, 43:147–150. Freidberg SR, Takaoka Y: Technique of high cervical percutaneous cordotomy. Symposium on surgical techniques. Surg Clin North Am 1973, 53:291–300. Gildenberg PL, Zanes C, Flitter M, et al.: Impedance measuring device for detection of penetration of the spinal cord in anterior percutaneous cervical cordotomy. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1969, 30:87–92. Kanpolat Y, Akyar S, Caglar S, et al.: CT-guided percutaneous selective cordotomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1993, 123:92–96. Krol G, Arbit E: Percutaneous lateral cervical cordotomy: target localization with water-soluble contrast medium. J Neurosurg 1993, 79:390–392. Lin PM, Gildenberg PL, Polakoff PP: An anterior approach to percutaneous lower cervical cordotomy. J Neurosurg 1966, 25:553–560. Rosomoff HL, Brown CJ, Shestak P: Percutaneous radiofrequency cervical cordotomy. Technique. J Neurosurg 1965, 23:639–644. Sander M, Zuurmond W: Safety of unilateral and bilateral percutaneous cervical cordotomy in 80 terminally ill cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 1995, 13:1509–1512. Stuart G, Cramond T: Role of percutaneous cervical cordotomy for pain of malignant origin. Med J Aust 1993, 158:667–670. Takaoka Y, Freidberg SR: Electrode carrier for percutaneous cordotomy. J Neurosurg 1965, 23:639–644. Hassenbusch SJ, Pillay PK, Barnett GH: Radiofrequency cingulotomy for intractable cancer pain using stereotaxis guided by magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 1990, 27:220–223. Wong ET, Gunes S, Gaughan E, et al.: Palliation of intractable cancer pain by MRI-guided cingulotomy. Clin J Pain 1997, 13:260–263. Young RF, Jacques DS, Rand RW, et al.: Technique of medial thalamotomy with the Leksell Gamma Knife for treatment of chronic pain. Neurol Res 1995, 17:59–65. Young RF, Vermeulen SS, Grimm P, Posewitz A: Electrophysiological target localization is not required for the treatment of functional disorders. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1996, 66(suppl 1):309–319. Conventional thinking has held that electrophysiologic recording or stimulation is necessary for safe and effective functional neurosurgical procedures. Young et al. advance the idea that such invasive techniques are not essential. If this idea is borne out by additional studies, Gamma Knife radiosurgery will probably assume a more prominent role in ablative neurosurgery for cancer pain and other neurologic disorders. Lindquist C, Kihlstrom L, Hellstrand E: Functional neurosurgery —a future for the Gamma Knife? Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1991, 57:72–81. Friehs GM, Noren G, Ohye C, et al.: Lesion size following Gamma Knife treatment for functional disorders. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1996, 66(suppl 1):320–328.