Ecology of a coastal population of the critically endangered Darwin's fox (<i>Pseudalopex fulvipes</i>) on Chiloé Island, southern Chile

Journal of Zoology - Tập 271 Số 1 - Trang 63-77 - 2007
Jaime E. Jiménez1
1Laboratorio de Ecología, Universidad de Los Lagos, Casilla, 933, Osorno, Chile

Tóm tắt

AbstractThe behavioral ecology of the critically endangered Darwin's fox Pseudalopex fulvipes was examined during the reproductive season of 2001/2002 on a coastal population, on Chiloé Island in southern Chile. Foxes were radio‐tracked and their diet and feeding behavior, activity patterns, home range sizes and spatial organization, habitat use and selection, social organization and abundance were studied. Foxes were solitary hunters and showed a generalist and opportunistic feeding behavior. Insects were the most abundant prey, followed by crustaceans, rodents, birds, amphibians, ungulates, reptiles, and marsupials. As marine organisms were frequently eaten, the ocean subsidy was important. Plant seeds were dispersed up to +650 m from their sources. Prey were hunted in all habitat types recognized, throughout the daily cycle, and were consumed as they were available along the season. All foxes were active throughout the day, but more so at night. Morphologically, aside from males having broader muzzles, they did not show external sexual dimorphism or differences in weight. The tail and feet of Darwin's foxes were relatively shorter than in other congeneric species. Individual home ranges and core areas ranged from 103 to 488 ha and from 30 to 130 ha, respectively, were similar between males and females, and larger than expected for foxes of that size. All home ranges were elongated (2930 m on average) following the shoreline. Foxes overlapped their home ranges extensively – and core areas less so – with individuals of the same or different gender, showing no apparent territorial behavior. They appear to be monogamous, allowing subordinates in their home ranges. The ecological density was 0.92 foxes km−2, which may be higher than in inland populations. Old‐growth forest was consistently avoided by all individuals, second‐growth forest and shrubland were used as available, and the use of dunes and other lands (mainly shores) was mixed.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2307/1378635

Angelbjörn A., 1997, Home range pattern in arctic foxes in Sweden, J. Wildl. Res., 2, 9

Atwood T.C., 2003, Spatial home‐range overlap and temporal interaction in eastern coyotes, the influence of pair types and fragmentation, 81, 1589

Brower J.E., 1998, Field and laboratory methods for general ecology

10.1111/j.1469-1795.2006.00044.x

10.4098/AT.arch.94-31

10.1139/z00-154

Chehébar C., 1989, Guía para el reconocimiento microscópico de los pelos de los mamíferos de la Patagonia, Doñana. Acta Ver., 16, 247

10.2307/1382685

Darwin C., 1962, The voyage of the Beagle

10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80020-7

10.4206/bosque.1984.v5n2-04

Eide N.E., 2004, Spatial organization of reproductive Arctic foxes Alopex lagopus, responses to changes in spatial and temporal availability of prey, 73, 1056

10.1080/14640748208400871

Garshelis D.L., 2000, Research techniques in animal ecology: controversies and consequences, 111

Geffen E., 1996, Size, life‐history traits, and social organization in the canidae, a reevaluation, 147, 140

Geffen E., 1992, Habitat selection and home range in the Blanford's fox, Vulpes cana, compatibility with the resource dispersion hypothesis, 91, 75

Geffen E., 1992, Small size and monogamy, spatial organization of Blanford's foxes, Vulpes cana, 44, 1123

Gese E.M., 2004, Canids: foxes, wolves, jackals and dogs. Status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group, 273

Greenberg C.H. Pelton M.R.&Parr P.D.(1988).Grey fox ecology in the Oak Ridge national environmental research park: food habits home range and habitat use. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Environmental Sciences Division Publication No. 3101.

10.2307/3808476

10.1111/j.1365-2907.1990.tb00106.x

10.2307/3545168

IUCN(2004).Pseudalopex fulvipes.http://www.iucnredlist.org/search/details.php/41586/summ(consulted June 2006).

10.2307/1382176

Jiménez J.E.(1993).Comparative ecology of Pseudalopex foxes at the Chinchilla National Reserve in northcentral Chile. MS thesis University of Florida Gainesville USA.

Jiménez J.E., 1990, Comparative ecology of Darwin's fox Pseudalopex fulvipes in mainland and island settings of southern Chile, Rev. Chile. Hist. Nat., 63, 177

Jiménez J.E., 2004, Canids: foxes, wolves, jackals and dogs. Status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group, 50

Jiménez J.E., 1996, Niche‐complementarity of South American foxes, reanalysis and test of a hypothesis, 69, 113

10.2307/1937156

Johnson W.E., 1994, Conservation implications of South American grey fox (Dusicyon griseus) socioecology in the Patagonia of southern Chile, Vida Silvestre Neotropical, 3, 16

10.1086/320621

10.1016/B978-012497781-5/50006-2

10.1046/j.1365-2656.1998.6760874.x

Lara A., 1996, Ecología de los bosques nativos de Chile, 335

10.2307/1938584

10.1017/S0952836902002959

Lovari S., 1996, Individual variations in diet, activity and habitat use of red foxes in a Mediterranean rural area, J. Wildl. Res., 1, 24

10.1016/0376-6357(95)00018-6

Macdonald D.W., 1981, Worldwide furbearer conference proceedings, 918

10.1038/301379a0

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198515562.001.0001

10.1016/0006-3207(90)90033-L

Miller D.S., 1983, Endangered mammals of Chile, status and conservation, 25, 335

10.2307/1941774

10.2307/3504160

10.2307/3800887

Olson D.M., 2000, The global 200, a representation approach to conserving the earth's most biologically valuable ecoregions, 12, 502

Osgood W.H., 1943, The mammals of Chile, Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Zool. Ser., 30, 1

Pearson O.P., 1995, Annotated keys for identifying small mammals living in or near Nahuel Huapi National Park or Lanin National Park, southern Argentina, Mastozool. Neotropical, 2, 99

10.1007/s100219900030

10.1515/mamm.1979.43.3.339

Rau J., 2002, Dieta otoño‐invernal del zorro de Darwin, una comparación entre dos hábitats de Chiloé, Chile, 8, 57

Reyes C.F.(1992).Clave para la identificación de los órdenes de aves chilenas: microestructura de los nodos de las bárbulas. Thesis for the teacher's degree in Biology and Natural Resources. Instituto Profesional de Osorno Osorno.

Reynolds J.C., 1991, Comparison and quantification of carnivore diet by faecal analysis, a critique, with recommendations, based on a study of the fox Vulpes vulpes, 21, 97

10.1017/S0952836901001066

Rose M.D., 1999, The distribution and abundance of coyotes, the effects of allochtonous food subsidies from the sea, 79, 998

10.2307/1383268

10.2307/4373

SAS Institute Inc., 1989, SAS/STAT user's guide

10.2307/2265701

Siegel S., 1989, Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences

10.1007/s004420050400

Sokal R.R., 1981, Biometry

10.1086/414314

10.2307/1939170

10.2307/1940437

Veblen T.T., 1983, Temperate broad‐leaved evergreen forests, 5

Warrick G.D., 1998, Factors affecting the spatial distribution of San Joaquin kit foxes, J. Wildl. Mgmt., 49, 190

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198515562.003.0003

White G.C., 1990, Analysis of wildlife radio‐tracking data

Yahnke C.J., 1996, Darwin's fox, a distinct endangered species in a vanishing habitat, 10, 366

Zoellick B.W., 2002, Movements and home ranges of San Joaquin kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis mutica) relative to oil‐field development, West. N. Am. Nat., 62, 151

10.2307/1381868