Connected power domination in graphs

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 38 - Trang 292-315 - 2019
Boris Brimkov1, Derek Mikesell1, Logan Smith1
1Department of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Rice University, Houston, USA

Tóm tắt

The study of power domination in graphs arises from the problem of placing a minimum number of measurement devices in an electrical network while monitoring the entire network. A power dominating set of a graph is a set of vertices from which every vertex in the graph can be observed, following a set of rules for power system monitoring. In this paper, we study the problem of finding a minimum power dominating set which is connected; the cardinality of such a set is called the connected power domination number of the graph. We show that the connected power domination number of a graph is NP-hard to compute in general, but can be computed in linear time in cactus graphs and block graphs. We also give various structural results about connected power domination, including a cut vertex decomposition and a characterization of the effects of various vertex and edge operations on the connected power domination number. Finally, we present novel integer programming formulations for power domination, connected power domination, and power propagation time, and give computational results.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aazami A (2008) Hardness results and approximation algorithms for some problems on graphs. Ph.D. thesis, Ph.D. thesis. University of Waterloo Aazami A (2010) Domination in graphs with bounded propagation: algorithms, formulations and hardness results. J Comb Optim 19(4):429–456 Aazami A, Stilp K (2009) Approximation algorithms and hardness for domination with propagation. SIAM J Discrete Math 23(3):1382–1399 AIM Special Work Group (2008) Zero forcing sets and the minimum rank of graphs. Linear Algebra Appl 428(7):1628–1648 Akhlaghi S, Zhou N, Wu NE (2016) PMU placement for state estimation considering measurement redundancy and controlled islanding. In: Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), pp 1–5 Aminifar F, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Shahidehpour M, Khodaei A (2011) Probabilistic multistage PMU placement in electric power systems. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 26(2):841–849 Bader DA, Kappes A, Meyerhenke H, Sanders P, Schulz C, Wagner D (2014) Benchmarking for graph clustering and partitioning. In: Encyclopedia of social network analysis and mining. Springer, pp 73–82 Baldwin T, Mili L, Boisen M, Adapa R (1993) Power system observability with minimal phasor measurement placement. IEEE Trans Power Syst 8(2):707–715 Barioli F, Fallat S, Hogben L (2004) Computation of minimal rank and path cover number for certain graphs. Linear Algebra Appl 392:289–303 Barioli F, Fallat S, Hogben L (2005) On the difference between the maximum multiplicity and path cover number for tree-like graphs. Linear Algebra Appl 409:13–31 Benson KF, Ferrero D, Flagg M, Furst V, Hogben L, Vasilevska V, Wissman B (2018) Power domination and zero forcing for graph products. Aust J Comb 70(2):221–235 Bondy JA, Murty USR (1976) Graph theory with applications, vol 290. Macmillan, London Bozeman C, Brimkov B, Erickson C, Ferrero D, Flagg M, Hogben L (2018) Restricted power domination and zero forcing problems. J Comb Optim, in press Brimkov B, Fast CC, Hicks IV (2018) Computational approaches for zero forcing and related problems. Eur J Oper Res, in press Brimkov B, Fast CC, Hicks IV (2017) Graphs with extremal connected forcing numbers. arXiv:1701.08500 Brimkov B, Hicks IV (2017) Complexity and computation of connected zero forcing. Discrete Appl Math 229:31–45 Brueni DJ (1993) Minimal PMU placement for graph observability: a decomposition approach. Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Tech Brueni DJ, Heath LS (2005) The PMU placement problem. SIAM J Discrete Math 19(3):744–761 Burgarth D, Giovannetti V (2007) Full control by locally induced relaxation. Phys Rev Lett 99(10):100501 Camby E, Cardinal J, Fiorini S, Schaudt O (2014) The price of connectivity for vertex cover. Discrete Math Theor Comput Sci 16:207–223 Caro Y, West DB, Yuster R (2000) Connected domination and spanning trees with many leaves. SIAM J Discrete Math 13(2):202–211 Chang GJ, Dorbec P, Montassier M, Raspaud A (2012) Generalized power domination of graphs. Discrete Appl Math 160(12):1691–1698 Chang GJ, Roussel N (2015) On the $k$-power domination of hypergraphs. J Comb Optim 30(4):1095–1106 Desormeaux WJ, Haynes TW, Henning MA (2013) Bounds on the connected domination number of a graph. Discrete Appl Math 161(18):2925–2931 Desrochers M, Laporte G (1991) Improvements and extensions to the Miller–Tucker–Zemlin subtour elimination constraints. Oper Res Lett 10(1):27–36 Dilkina BN, Gomes CP (2010) Solving connected subgraph problems in wildlife conservation. In: CPAIOR, vol 6140. Springer, pp 102–116 Dorbec P, Klavžar S (2014) Generalized power domination: propagation radius and Sierpiński graphs. Acta Appl Math 134(1):75–86 Edholm CJ, Hogben L, LaGrange J, Row DD (2012) Vertex and edge spread of zero forcing number, maximum nullity, and minimum rank of a graph. Linear Algebra Appl 436(12):4352–4372 Fan N, Watson J-P (2012) Solving the connected dominating set problem and power dominating set problem by integer programming. In: International conference on combinatorial optimization and applications. Springer, pp 371–383 Ferrero D, Hogben L, Kenter FH, Young M (2017) Note on power propagation time and lower bounds for the power domination number. J Comb Optim 34(3):736–741 Fomin FV, Grandoni F, Kratsch D (2008) Solving connected dominating set faster than $2^n$. Algorithmica 52(2):153–166 Garey MR, Johnson DS (1979) Computers and intractability. W.H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco Guo J, Niedermeier R, Raible D (2005) Improved algorithms and complexity results for power domination in graphs. In: FCT, vol 3623. Springer, pp 172–184 Haynes TW, Hedetniemi SM, Hedetniemi ST, Henning MA (2002) Domination in graphs applied to electric power networks. SIAM J Discrete Math 15(4):519–529 Huang L-H, Chang GJ, Yeh H-G (2010) On minimum rank and zero forcing sets of a graph. Linear Algebra Appl 432(11):2961–2973 Huang L, Sun Y, Xu J, Gao W, Zhang J, Wu Z (2014) Optimal PMU placement considering controlled islanding of power system. IEEE Trans Power Syst 29(2):742–755 IEEE reliability test data (2012). http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/pstca/ Kneis J, Mölle D, Richter S, Rossmanith P (2006) Parameterized power domination complexity. Inf Process Lett 98(4):145–149 Li Q, Cui T, Weng Y, Negi R, Franchetti F, Ilic MD (2013) An information-theoretic approach to PMU placement in electric power systems. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 4(1):446–456 Li Y, Yang Z, Wang W (2017) Complexity and algorithms for the connected vertex cover problem in 4-regular graphs. Appl Math Comput 301:107–114 Liao C-S (2016) Power domination with bounded time constraints. J Comb Optim 31(2):725–742 Liao C-S, Lee D-T (2005) Power domination problem in graphs. In: COCOON. Springer, pp 818–828 Manousakis NM, Korres GN, Georgilakis PS (2012) Taxonomy of PMU placement methodologies. IEEE Trans Power Syst 27(2):1070–1077 Martin RK (1991) Using separation algorithms to generate mixed integer model reformulations. Oper Res Lett 10(3):119–128 Mili L, Baldwin T, Phadke A (1991) Phasor measurements for voltage and transient stability monitoring and control. In: Workshop on application of advanced mathematics to power systems, San Francisco Miller CE, Tucker AW, Zemlin RA (1960) Integer programming formulation of traveling salesman problems. J ACM 7(4):326–329 Nylen PM (1996) Minimum-rank matrices with prescribed graph. Linear Algebra Appl 248:303–316 Peng J, Sun Y, Wang H (2006) Optimal PMU placement for full network observability using Tabu search algorithm. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 28(4):223–231 Quintão FP, da Cunha AS, Mateus GR, Lucena A (2010) The k-cardinality tree problem: reformulations and Lagrangian relaxation. Discrete Appl Math 158(12):1305–1314 Row D (2012) Zero forcing number, path cover number, and maximum nullity of cacti. Involve 4(3):277–291 Sampathkumar E, Walikar HB (1979) The connected domination number of a graph. J Math Phys Sci 13(6):607–613 Sodhi R, Srivastava S, Singh S (2011) Multi-criteria decision-making approach for multi-stage optimal placement of phasor measurement units. IET Gener Transm Distrib 5(2):181–190 Tarjan RE (1974) A note on finding the bridges of a graph. Inf Process Lett 2(6):160–161 Yang B (2013) Fast-mixed searching and related problems on graphs. Theor Comput Sci 507:100–113