Urban sprawl and related problems: Bibliometric analysis and refined analysis from 1991 to 2011
Tóm tắt
To shed light on the general patterns and trends in urban sprawl research, and to provide reference for future study, bibliometric analysis and refined analysis are conducted for publications in this area from 1991 to 2011. The general publication output, the global geographical distribution of the authors, the funding and institutions involved, the research areas, and the source titles are analyzed and discussed. Scholars in the United States and China have produced most of the documents in urban sprawl and these two countries are also the largest contributors in terms of funding and institutions. ‘Environmental Sciences & Ecology’, ‘Urban Studies’, and ‘Geography’ are the most common research areas, and the journal titled Urban Studies has contributed the most articles. Furthermore, the refined analyses on the 500 top-cited and most relevant publications have revealed that research on urban sprawl is closely associated with the categories of ‘Urban form and development’, ‘Land use/land development’ and ‘environment/ecology/biology’. Conclusions are made with respect to the basic paradigm of research on urban sprawl. The multi-disciplinary research into urban sprawl are expected to be more diversified and integrated.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Angel S, Parent J, Civco, D L et al., 2011. The dimensions of global urban expansion: Estimates and projections for all countries, 2000-2050. Progress in Planning, 75: 53–107. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2011.04.001
Antrop M, 2004. Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning, 67(1): 9–26. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00026-4
Barredo J I, Demicheli L, 2003. Urban sustainability in developing countries’ megacities: Modeling and predicting future urban growth in Lagos. Cities, 20(5): 297–310. doi: 10.1016/S0264-2751(03)00047-7
Blair R, 2004. The effects of urban sprawl on birds at multiple levels of biological organization. Ecology and Society, 9(5): art2. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss5/art2.
Boone-Heinonen J, Gordon-Larsen P, Guilkey D K et al., 2011. Environment and physical activity dynamics: The role of residential self-selection. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(1): 54–60. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.09.003
Brabec E, 2002. Impervious surfaces and water quality: A review of current literature and its implications for watershed planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 16(4): 499–514. doi: 10.1177/088541202400903563
Brueckner J K, 2000. Urban sprawl: Diagnosis and remedies. International Regional Science Review, 23(2): 160–171. doi: 10.1177/016001700761012710
Brueckner J K, Mills E, Kremer M et al., 2001. Urban sprawl: Lessons from urban economics. In: Gale W G et al. (eds.). Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 65–97.
Burchell R W, Lowenstein G, Dolphin W R et al., 2002. Costs of Sprawl, 2000. Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report 74. Transportation Research Board: Washington.
Camagni R, Gibelli M C, Rigamonti P, 2002. Urban mobility and urban form: The social and environmental costs of different patterns of urban expansion. Ecological Economics, 40(2): 199–216. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00254-3
Chakir R, Parent O, 2009. Determinants of land use changes: A spatial multinomial probit approach. Papers in Regional Science, 88(2): 327–344. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2009.00239.x
Chan C K, Yao X H, 2008. Air pollution in mega cities in China. Atmospheric Environment, 42(1): 1–42. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.003
Chen J, 2007. Rapid urbanization in China: A real challenge to soil protection and food security. Catena, 69(1): 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2006.04.019
Claggett P R, Jantz C A, Goetz S J et al., 2004. Assessing development pressure in the Chesapeake Bay watershed: An evaluation of two land-use change models. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 94: 129–146. doi: 10.1023/B:EMAS.0000016884.96098.77
Cohen B, 2006. Urbanization in developing countries: Current trends, future projections and key challenges for sustainability. Technology in Society, 28: 63–80. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005. 10.005
Couch C, Karecha J, Nuissl H et al., 2005. Decline and sprawl: An evolving type of urban development-observed in Liverpool and Leipzig. European Planning Studies, 13(1): 117–36. doi: 10.1080/0965431042000312433
Couch C, Lila L, Gerhard P H, 2007. Urban Sprawl in Europe, Landscapes, Land Use Changes and Policy. Malaysia: Blackwell.
Deng F F, Huang Y, 2004. Uneven land reform and urban sprawl in China: The case of Beijing. Progress in Planning, 61(3): 211–236. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2003.10.004
Ding H, Wang R C, Wu J P et al., 2007. Quantifying land use change in Zhejiang Coastal Region, China using multi-temporal Landsat TM/ETM+ Images. Pedosphere, 17(6): 712–720. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(07)60086-1
Eckenrod S B, Holahan W L, 2004. Teaching the economics of urban sprawl in the Principles of economics course. The Journal of Economic Education, 35(3): 295–303. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30042604
Ewing R, 1994. Characteristics, causes and effects of sprawl: A literature review. Environmental and Urban Studies, 21(2): 1–15. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-73412-5_34
Ewing R, Schmid T, Killingsworth R et al., 2003. Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18(1): 47–57. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-73412-5_37
Ewing R, Brownson R C, Berrigan D, 2006. Relationship between urban sprawl and weight of United States Youth. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 31(6): 464–474. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.08.020
Fenger J, 1999. Urban air quality. Atmospheric Environment, 33(29): 4877–4900. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00290-3
Fliege U S, 1999. Characteristics of post-socialist urban transformation in East Central Europe. GeoJounal, 49: 7–16. doi: 10.1023/A:1006905405818
Galster G, Hanson R, Ratcliffe M R et al., 2001. Wrestling sprawl to the ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept. Housing Policy Debate, 12(4): 681–717.
Garcia M, 2006. Citizenship practices and urban governance in European cities. Urban Studies, 43(4): 745–765. doi: 10.1080/00420980600597491
Glaeser E L, Kahn M E, 2003. Sprawl and Urban Growth. In: Henderson J V et al. (eds.). The Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics. England: Oxford University Press, 1–55.
Hansen A J, Knight R L, Marzluff J M et al., 2005. Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: Patterns, mechanisms, and research needs. Ecological Applications, 15(6): 1893–1905. doi: 10.1890/05-5221
Irwin E G, Bockstael N E, 2004. Land use externalities, open space preservation and urban sprawl. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 34(6): 705–725. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2004.03.002
Irwin E G, Bockstael N E, 2007. The evolution of urban sprawl: Evidence of spatial heterogeneity and increasing land fragmentation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(52): 20672–20677.
Jenks M, Burgess R, 2000. Compact Cities, Sustainable Urban Forms for Developing Countries. London: E. & F. N. Spon.
Johnson M P, 2001. Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: A survey of the literature and proposed research agenda. Environment and Planning A, 33(4): 717–735. doi: 10.1068/a3327
Knaap G J, Song Y, Ewing R et al., 2005. Seeing the Elephant: Multidisciplinary Measures of Urban Sprawl. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Liu J, Zhan J, Deng X, 2005. Spatio-temporal patterns and driving forces of urban land expansion in China during the economic reform era. Ambio, 34(6): 450–455. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447-34.6.450
Liu J G, Dally G C, Ehrlich P R et al., 2003. Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature, 421(6922): 530–533. doi: 10.1038/nature01359
Liu X J, Zhang L, Hong S, 2011. Global biodiversity research during 1900–2009: A bibliometric analysis. Biodiversity Conservation, 20: 807–826. doi: 10.1007/s10531-010-9981-z
Lopez R, 2004. Urban sprawl and risk for being overweight or obese. American Journal of Public Health, 94(9): 1574–1579. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.94.9.1574
Lu Z, Dai F, Sun C, 2012. Evaluation of urban sprawl and urban landscape pattern in a rapidly developing region. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184(10): 6437–6448. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2431-x
Milder J C, Clark S, 2011. Conservation development practices, extent, and land use effects in the United States. Conservation Biology, 25(4): 697–707. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01688.x
Muñiz I, Galindo A, 2005. Urban form and the ecological footprint of commuting, the case of Barcelona. Ecological Economics, 55(4): 499–514. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.008
Munoz F, 2003. Lock living: Urban sprawl in Mediterranean cities. Cities, 20(6): 381–385. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2003.08.003
Northridge M E, Sclar E D, Biswas P, 2003. Sorting out the connections between the built environment and health: A conceptual framework for navigating. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 80(4): 556–568. doi: 10.1093/jurban/jtg064
Patacchini E, Zenou Y, Henderson J V et al., 2009. Urban Sprawl in Europe. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, 125–149.
Papas M A, Alberg A J, Ewing R et al., 2007. The built environment and obesity. Epidemiologic Reviews, 29(1): 129–143. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxm009
Patz J A, Campbell-Lendrum D, Holloway T et al., 2005. Impact of regional climate change on human health. Nature, 438(7066): 310–317. doi: 10.1038/nature04188
Radeloff V C, Hammer R B, Stewart S I et al., 2005. The wildland-urban interface in the United States. Ecological Applications, 15(3): 799–805. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/04-1413
Sarvestani M S, Ibrahim A L, Kanaroglou P, 2011. Three decades of urban growth in the city of Shiraz, Iran: A remote sensing and geographic information systems application. Cities, 28(4): 320–329. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2011.03.002
Shao M, Tang X Y, Zhang Y H et al., 2006. City clusters in China: Air and surface water pollution. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4: 353–361. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2006)004[0353:CCICAA]2.0.CO;2
Shammin M R, Herendeen R A, Hanson M J et al., 2010. A multivariate analysis of the energy intensity of sprawl versus compact living in the US for 2003. Ecological Economics, 69(12): 2363–2373. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.07.003
Shen Q, Zhang F, 2007. Land use changes in a pro-smart-growth state: Maryland, USA. Environment and Planning A, 39(6): 1457–1477. doi: 10.1068/a3886
Shi Long Yu, Shao Guo Fan, Cui Sheng Hui et al., 2009. Urban three-dimensional expansion and its driving forces-a case study of Shanghai, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 19(4): 291–298. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0291-x
Steo K C, Fragkias M, 2005. Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of urban land-use change in four cities of China with time series landscape metrics. Landscape Ecology, 20: 871–888. doi: 10.1007/s10980-005-5238-8
Stone B, 2008. Urban sprawl and air quality in large US cities. Journal of Environmental Management, 86: 688–698. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.034
Stone B, Hess J J, Frumkin H, 2010. Urban form and extreme heat events: Are sprawling cities more vulnerable to climate change than compact cities? Environmental Health Perspectives, 118(10): 1425–1428. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901879
Sudhira H S, Ramachandra T V, Jagadish K S, 2004. Urban sprawl: Metrics dynamics and modeling using GIS. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 5(1): 29–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2003.08.002
Tan M H, Li X B, Xie H et al., 2005. Urban land expansion and arable land loss in China: A case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region. Land Use Policy, 22(3): 187–196. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.03.003
Taubenböck H, Wegmann M, Roth A et al., 2009. Analysis of urban sprawl at mega city Cairo, Egypt using multisensoral remote sensing data, landscape metrics and gradient analysis. Proceedings of the ISRSE Conference, Stresa, Italy.
Van Metre P C, Mahler B J, Furlong E T, 2000. Urban sprawl leaves its PAH signature. Environmental Science & Technology, 34(19): 4064–4070. doi: 10.1021/es991007n
Wang H J, He Q Q, Liu X J et al., 2012. Global urbanization research from 1991 to 2009: A systematic research review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104: 299–309. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2011.03.031
Waterhout B, Zonneveld W, Meijers E, 2005. Polycentric development policies in Europe: Overview and debate. Built Environment, 31(2): 163–173. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2148/benv.31.2.163.66250
Weng Q, 2001. A remote sensing-GIS evaluation of urban expansion and its impact on surface temperature in the Zhujiang Delta, China. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(10): 1999–2014. doi: 10.1080/713860788
Weng Q H, 2002. Land use change analysis in the Zhujiang Delta of China using remote sensing. GIS and stochastic modeling, 64(3): 273–284. doi: 10.1006/jema.2001.0509
Wu F, Webster C J, 1998. Simulation of land development through the integration of cellular automata and multicriteria evaluation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25(1): 103–126. doi: 10.1068/b250103
Yang X, Lo C P, 2002. Using a time series of satellite imagery to detect land use and land cover changes in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(9): 1775–1798. doi: 10.1080/01431160110075802
Yeh A G O, Li X, 1999. Economic development and agricultural land loss in the Pearl River Delta, China. Habitat International, 23(3): 373–390. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(99)00013-2
Yeh A G O, Li X, 2001a. Measurement and monitoring of urban sprawl in a rapidly growing region using entropy. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67(1): 83–90. http://www.asprs.org/a/publications/pers/2001journal/january/2001_jan_83-90.pdf.
Yeh A G O, Li X, 2001b. A constrained CA model for the simulation and planning of sustainable urban forms by using GIS. Environment and Planning B, 28(5): 733–753. doi: 10.1068/b2740
Zhang X L, Chen J, Tan M Z et al., 2007. Assessing the impact of urban on soil resources of Nanjing city using satellite images and digital soil databases. Catena, 69(1): 16–30. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2006.04.020