The proximity of others: A critique of crowding research and integration with the Social Sciences

Albert, S., & Dabbs, J.M., Jr..Physical distance and persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970,15, 265–270. Altman, I.The environment and social behavior. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1975. Asch, S.E. Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 1956, 70 (9, Whole No. 416). Baron, R.A., & Bell, P.A..Physical distance and helping: Some unexpected benefits of “crowding in” on others.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1976,6, 95–104. Batchelor, J.P., & Goethals, G.R..Spatial arrangements in freely formed groups.Sociometry, 1972,35, 270–279. Baum, A., Harpin, R.E., & Valins, S.. The role of group phenomena in the experience of crowding. In S. Saegert (Ed.),Crowding in real environments. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1976. Cottrell, N.B., Wack, D.L., Sekerak, G.J., & Rittle, R.H. Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audience and the mere presence of others.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968,9, 245–250. Cozby, P.C. Effects of density, activity, and personality on environmental preferences.Journal of Research in Personality, 1973,1, 45–60. Desor, J.A. Toward a psychological theory of crowding.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972,21, 79–83. Epstein, Y.M., & Karlin, R.A. Effects of acute experimental crowding.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1975,5, 34–53. Ernest, R.C., & Cooper, R.E. “Hey mister, do you have any change?”: Two real world studies of proxemic effects on compliance with a mundane request.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1974,1, 158–159. Fisher, J.D. Situation-specific variables as determinants of perceived environmental aesthetic quality and perceived crowdedness.Journal of Research in Personality, 1974,8, 177–188. Galle, O.R., Gove, W.R., & McPherson, J.M. Population density and pathology: What are the relations for man?Science, 1972,176, 23–30. Geisen, M., & McClaren, H.A. Discussion, distance, and sex: Changes in impression and attraction during small group interaction.Sociometry, 1976,39, 60–70. Gerard, H.B. The anchorage of opinions in face-to-face groups.Human Relations, 1954,7, 313–325. Gerard, H.B., Wilhelmy, R.A., & Conolley, E.S. Conformity and group size.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 168,8, 79–82. Griffith, C.R. A comment upon the psychology of the audience.Psychological Monographs, 1921,30 (136), 36–47. Hutt, C., & Vaizey, M.J. Differential effects of group density on social behavior.Nature, 1966,209, 1371–1372. Jorgenson, D.O., & Dukes, F.O. Deindividuation as a function of density and group membership.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976,34, 24–29. Knowles, E.S. Boundaries around social space: Dyadic responses to an invader.Environment and Behavior, 1972,4, 437–445. Knowles, E.S. Boundaries around group interaction: The effect of group size and member status on boundary permeability.Journal of Personality and Social Pscyhology, 1973,26, 327–331. Knowles, E.S. The gravity of crowding: Application of social physics to the effects of others. In A. Baum & Y. Epstein (Eds.),Human response to crowding. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1978. Knowles, E.S., & Bassett, R.L. Groups and crowds as social entities: The effects of activity, size, and member similarity on non-members.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976,34, 837–845. Konečni, V., Libuser, L., Morton, H., & Ebbesen, E.B. Effects of a violation of personal space on escape and helping responses.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1975,11, 288–299. Latané, B., & Harkins, S. Cross-modality matches suggest anticipated stage fright a multiplicative power function of audience size and status.Perception and Psychophysics, 1976,20, 482–488. Lindskold, S., Albert, K.P., Baer, R., & Moore, W.C. Territorial boundaries of Interacting groups and passive audiences.Sociometry, 1976,39, 71–76. Loo, C.M. Important issues in researching the effects of crowding on humans.Representative Research in Social Psychology, 1973,4, 219–227. Martens, R., & Landers, D.M. Evaluation potential as a determinant of coaction effects.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1972,8, 347–359. McBride, G.C., King, M.G., & James, J.W. Social proximity effects on galvanic skin responses in adult humans.Journal of Psychology, 1965,61, 153–157. McClelland, L.A. Crowding and social stress. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1974. McPhail, C., & Miller, D.L. The assembling process: A theoretical and empirical examination.American Sociological Review, 1973,38, 721–735. Mehrabian, A., & Friar, J. Encoding of attitude by a seated communicator via posture and position cues.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1969,33, 330–336. Middlemist, R.D., Knowles, E.S., & Matter, C.F. Personal space invasions in the lavatory: Suggestive evidence for arousal.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976,33, 541–546. Milgram, S. Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority.Human Relations, 1965,18, 57–75. Milgram, S., Bickman, L., & Berkowitz, L. Note on the drawing power of crowds of different size.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969,13, 79–82. Milgram, S., & Toch, H. Collective behavior: Crowds and social movements. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (Eds.),Handbook of social psychology, (2nd edition), Vol. 4. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969. Nordholm, L.A. Effects of group size and stimulus ambiguity on conformity.Journal of Social Psychology, 1975,97, 123–130. Paulus, P.B., Annis, A.B., Seta, J.J., Schkade, J.K., & Matthews, R.W. Density does affect task performance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976,34, 248–253. Porter, H. Studies in the psychology of stuttering. XIV. Stuttering phenomena in relation to size and personnel of audience.Journal of Speech Disorders, 1939,4, 323–333. Saegert, S. Crowding: Cognitive overload and behavioral constraint. In W.F.E. Preiser (Ed.),Environmental Design research: Proceedings of EDRAIV Conference.Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, 1973. Saegert, S. Effects of spatial and social density on arousal, mood, and social orientation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1974. Schiffenbauer, A., & Schaivo, R.S. Physical distance and attraction: An intensification effect.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1976,12, 274–282. Seta, J.J., Paulus, P.B., & Schkade, J.K. The effects of group size and proximity under cooperative and competitive conditions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976,34, 47–53. Sommer, R.Tight spaces: Hard architecture and how to humanize it. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1974. Stewart, J.Q. An inverse distance variation for certain social influences.Science, 1941,93, 89–90. Stewart, J.Q. Demographic gravitation: Evidence and application.Sociometry, 1948,11, 31–58. Stewart, J.Q. A basis for social physics.Impact of Science on Society, 1952,3, 110–133. Stokols, D. On the distinction between density and crowding: Some implications for future research.Psychological Review, 1972,79, 275–277. Stokols, D., Rall, M., Pinner, B., & Schopler, J. Physical social, and personal determinants of the perception of crowding.Environment and Behavior, 1973,5, 87–115. Storms, M., & Thomas, G. Reactions to physical closeness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977,35, 412–418. Sullivan, T.J. The “critical mass” in crowd behavior: Crowd size, contagion, and the evolution of riots.Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 1977,4, 46–59. Valins, S., & Baum, A. Residential group size, social interaction, and crowding.Environment and Behavior, 1973,5, 421–439. Wilder, D.A. Perception of groups, size of opposition, and social influence.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1977,13, 253–268. Willis, F.N., Jr. Initial speaking distance as a function of the speaker's relationship.Psychonomic Science, 1966,5, 221–222. Zipf, G.K.Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1949.