Optimal Infrastructure after Trade Reform in India

Journal of Development Economics - Tập 166 - Trang 103208 - 2024
Priyam Verma1
1Aix Marseille School of Economics, 5-9 Boulevard Maurice Bourdet, Marseille, , France

Tài liệu tham khảo

Amiti, 2007, Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: Evidence from Indonesia, Amer. Econ. Rev., 97, 1611, 10.1257/aer.97.5.1611 Arkolakis, 2019, The elusive pro-competitive effects of trade, Rev. Econom. Stud., 86, 46 Aschauer, 1989, Is public expenditure productive?, J. Monetary Econ., 23, 177, 10.1016/0304-3932(89)90047-0 Barro, 1990, Government spending in a simple model of endogeneous growth, J. Political Econ., 98, S103, 10.1086/261726 Bloom, Nicholas, Handley, Kyle, Kurmann, André, Luck, Philip, 2019. The impact of chinese trade on us employment: The good, the bad, and the apocryphal. In: American Economic Association Annual Meetings. Bostashvili, 2019, Political budget cycles and the civil service: Evidence from highway spending in US states, J. Public Econ., 175, 17, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.04.004 Bougheas, 2000, Infrastructure, specialization, and economic growth, Can. J. Econ., 33, 506, 10.1111/0008-4085.00026 Bougheas, 1999, Infrastructure, transport costs and trade, J. Int. Econ., 47, 169, 10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00008-7 Briceño, 2004 Caliendo, 2019, Trade and labor market dynamics: General equilibrium analysis of the china trade shock, Econometrica, 87, 741, 10.3982/ECTA13758 Chakravorty, 2008, Openness, lobbying, and provision of infrastructure, South. Econ. J., 1149, 10.1002/j.2325-8012.2008.tb00885.x Chatterjee, 2021, How productive is public investment? Evidence from formal and informal production in India, J. Dev. Econ., 151, 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102625 Chatterjee, 2023, India’s inward (re) turn: Is it warranted? Will it work?, Indian Econ. Rev., 1 Clarida, 1992, Government, trade, and comparative advantage, Am. Econ. Rev., 82, 122 Cubas, 2018, Public capital and economic development, Econ. J. David, 2013, The China syndrome: Local labor market effects of import competition in the United States, Amer. Econ. Rev., 103, 2121, 10.1257/aer.103.6.2121 Eaton, 2002, Technology, geography, and trade, Econometrica, 70, 1741, 10.1111/1468-0262.00352 Estache, 2007 Feenstra, 2019, US exports and employment, J. Int. Econ., 120, 46, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2019.05.002 Feenstra, 2018, The ‘China shock,’ exports and US employment: A global input–output analysis, Rev. Int. Econ., 26, 1053, 10.1111/roie.12370 Ferriere, Axelle, Navarro, Gaston, Reyes-Heroles, Ricardo, et al., 2023. Escaping the losses from trade: The impact of heterogeneity on skill acquisition. Working Paper. Francois, 2013, Institutions, infrastructure, and trade, World Dev., 46, 165, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.02.009 Fujimura, 2006 Giri, 2021, Gains from trade: Does sectoral heterogeneity matter?, J. Int. Econ., 129, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2021.103429 Goldberg, 2010, Imported intermediate inputs and domestic product growth: Evidence from India, Q. J. Econ., 125, 1727, 10.1162/qjec.2010.125.4.1727 Goldsmith-Pinkham, 2020, Bartik instruments: What, when, why, and how, Amer. Econ. Rev., 110, 2586, 10.1257/aer.20181047 Halpern, 2015, Imported inputs and productivity, Amer. Econ. Rev., 105, 3660, 10.1257/aer.20150443 Hasan, 2007, Trade reforms, labor regulations, and labor-demand elasticities: Empirical evidence from India, Rev. Econ. Stat., 89, 466, 10.1162/rest.89.3.466 Hasan, 2012, Trade liberalization and unemployment: Theory and evidence from India, J. Dev. Econ., 97, 269, 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.04.002 Khemani, 2010 Kocherlakota, 1996, A simple time series test of endogenous vs. exogenous growth models: An application to the United States, Rev. Econ. Stat., 126, 10.2307/2109852 Kocherlakota, 1997, Is there endogenous long-run growth? Evidence from the United States and the United Kingdom, J. Money Credit Bank., 235, 10.2307/2953677 Kovak, 2013, Regional effects of trade reform: What is the correct measure of liberalization?, Amer. Econ. Rev., 103, 1960, 10.1257/aer.103.5.1960 Lall, 2007, Infrastructure and regional growth, growth dynamics and policy relevance for India, Ann. Reg. Sci., 41, 581, 10.1007/s00168-006-0112-4 Limao, 2001, Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport costs, and trade, World Bank Econ. Rev., 15, 451, 10.1093/wber/15.3.451 Mitra, 2002, Productivity and technical efficiency in Indian states’ manufacturing: The role of infrastructure, Econom. Dev. Cult. Chang., 50, 395, 10.1086/321916 Nagaraj, 2000, Long-run growth trends and convergence across Indian states, J. Int. Dev., 12, 45, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(200001)12:1<45::AID-JID586>3.0.CO;2-Z Ndulu, 2007 Pavcnik, 2002, Trade liberalization, exit, and productivity improvements: Evidence from Chilean plants, Rev. Econom. Stud., 69, 245, 10.1111/1467-937X.00205 Sahoo, 2009, Infrastructure development and economic growth in India, J. Asia Pac. Econ., 14, 351, 10.1080/13547860903169340 Tombe, 2019, Trade, migration, and productivity: A quantitative analysis of China, Amer. Econ. Rev., 109, 1843, 10.1257/aer.20150811 Topalova, 2010, Factor immobility and regional impacts of trade liberalization: Evidence on poverty from India, Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ., 2, 1, 10.1257/app.2.4.1 Topalova, 2011, Trade liberalization and firm productivity: The case of India, Rev. Econ. Stat., 93, 995, 10.1162/REST_a_00095 Van Leemput, 2021, A passage to India: Quantifying internal and external barriers to trade, J. Int. Econ., 131, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2021.103473