DNA transfer when using gloves in burglary simulations

Helmus, 2016, DNA transfer-a never ending story. A study on scenarios involving a second person as carrier, Int. J. Leg. Med., 130, 121, 10.1007/s00414-015-1284-1 Goray, 2013, DNA transfer during social interactions, Forensic Sci. Int Genet Suppl. Ser., 4, e101, 10.1016/j.fsigss.2013.10.052 Taroni, 2013, Whose DNA is this? How relevant a question? (A note for forensic scientists), Forensic Sci. Int Genet, 7, 467, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.03.012 Champod, 2013, DNA transfer: informed judgment or mere guesswork?, Front. Genet., 4, 300, 10.3389/fgene.2013.00300 Gosch, 2019, On DNA transfer: The lack and difficulty of systematic research and how to do it better, Forensic Sci. Int Genet., 40, 24, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.01.012 Biedermann, 2016, The importance of critically examining the level of propositions when evaluating forensic DNA results, Front Genet., 7, 8, 10.3389/fgene.2016.00008 Cook, 1998, A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework, Sci. Justice, 38, 231, 10.1016/S1355-0306(98)72117-3 Buckleton, 2014, Helping formulate propositions in forensic DNA analysis, Sci. Justice, 54, 258, 10.1016/j.scijus.2014.02.007 Willis, 2015, ENFSI guideline for evaluative reporting in forensic science, Eur. Netw. Forensic Sci. Inst. Gill, 2020, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 44, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102186 Raymond, 2008, Assessing trace DNA evidence from a residential burglary: abundance, transfer and persistence, Forensic Sci. Int Genet Suppl. Ser., 1, 442, 10.1016/j.fsigss.2007.10.040 Evett, 2000, More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions, Sci. Justice, 40, 3, 10.1016/S1355-0306(00)71926-5 van Oorschot, 2019, DNA transfer in forensic science: a review, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 38, 140, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.10.014 Meakin, 2017, Trace DNA evidence dynamics: an investigation into the deposition and persistence of directly- and indirectly-transferred DNA on regularly-used knives, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 29, 38, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.03.016 Pfeifer, 2017, Persistence of touch DNA on burglary-related tools, Int. J. Leg. Med., 131, 941, 10.1007/s00414-017-1551-4 van Oorschot, 2014, Persistence of DNA deposited by the original user on objects after subsequent use by a second person, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 8, 219, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.10.005 Goray, 2020, DNA detection of a temporary and original user of an office space, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 44, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102203 Sessa, 2019, Touch DNA: impact of handling time on touch deposit and evaluation of different recovery techniques: an experimental study, Sci. Rep., 9, 9542, 10.1038/s41598-019-46051-9 Verdon, 2013, The influence of substrate on DNA transfer and extraction efficiency, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 7, 167, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.09.004 Goray, 2012, Evaluation of multiple transfer of DNA using mock case scenarios, Leg. Med. (Tokyo), 14, 40, 10.1016/j.legalmed.2011.09.006 Goray, 2016, Shedder status-an analysis of self and non-self DNA in multiple handprints deposited by the same individuals over time, Forensic Sci. Int Genet, 23, 190, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.05.005 Goray, 2021, Shedder status: exploring means of determination, Sci. Justice, 61, 391, 10.1016/j.scijus.2021.03.004 Lowe, 2002, The propensity of individuals to deposit DNA and secondary transfer of low level DNA from individuals to inert surfaces, Forensic Sci. Int., 129, 25, 10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00207-4 Szkuta, 2017, Transfer and persistence of DNA on the hands and the influence of activities performed, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 28, 10, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.01.006 Goray, 2010, Investigation of secondary DNA transfer of skin cells under controlled test conditions, Leg. Med. (Tokyo), 12, 117, 10.1016/j.legalmed.2010.01.003 Goray, 2010, Secondary DNA transfer of biological substances under varying test conditions, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 4, 62, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.05.001 Cale, 2016, Could secondary DNA transfer falsely place someone at the scene of a crime?, J. Forensic Sci., 61, 196, 10.1111/1556-4029.12894 Samie, 2016, Stabbing simulations and DNA transfer, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 22, 73, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.02.001 Oldoni, 2016, Shedding light on the relative DNA contribution of two persons handling the same object, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 24, 148, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.07.002 Szkuta, 2019, Assessment of the transfer, persistence, prevalence and recovery of DNA traces from clothing: an inter-laboratory study on worn upper garments, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 42, 56, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.06.011 Magee, 2018, Wearer and non-wearer DNA on the collars and cuffs of upper garments of worn clothing, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 34, 152, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.02.011 Meakin, 2013, DNA transfer: review and implications for casework, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 7, 434, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.03.013 Fonnelop, 2015, Secondary and subsequent DNA transfer during criminal investigation, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 17, 155, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.05.009 Goray, 2019, DNA transfer: DNA acquired by gloves during casework examinations, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 38, 167, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.10.018 Margiotta, 2015, Risk of dna transfer by gloves in forensic casework, Forensic Sci. Int Genet Suppl. Ser., 5, e527, 10.1016/j.fsigss.2015.09.208 Poy, 2006, Beware; gloves and equipment used during the examination of exhibits are potential vectors for transfer of DNA-containing material, Int. Congr. Ser., 1288, 556, 10.1016/j.ics.2005.09.126 Otten, 2019, Secondary DNA transfer by working gloves, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 43, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.07.005 Tanzhaus, 2021, "I've never been at the crime scene!" - gloves as carriers for secondary DNA transfer, Int. J. Leg. Med., 135, 1385, 10.1007/s00414-021-02597-w van Oorschot, 2021, DNA transfer in forensic science: recent progress towards meeting challenges, Genes (Basel), 12, 10.3390/genes12111766 Lehmann, 2015, Following the transfer of DNA: How does the presence of background DNA affect the transfer and detection of a target source of DNA?, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 19, 68, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.05.002 Szkuta, 2019, The presence of background DNA on common entry points to homes, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. Suppl. Ser., 7, 784, 10.1016/j.fsigss.2019.10.177 Castella, 2006, Forensic evaluation of the QIAshredder/QIAamp DNA extraction procedure, Forensic Sci. Int., 156, 70, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.11.012 Bright, 2016, Developmental validation of STRmix, expert software for the interpretation of forensic DNA profiles, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 23, 226, 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.05.007 Gehrig, 2014, Allelic proportions of 16 STR loci-including the new European Standard Set (ESS) loci-in a Swiss population sample, Int. J. Leg. Med., 128, 461, 10.1007/s00414-013-0949-x Russell, 2019, A guide to results and diagnostics within a STRmix™ report, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Forensic Sci., 1 Biedermann, 2009, Implementing statistical learning methods through Bayesian networks. Part 1: a guide to Bayesian parameter estimation using forensic science data, Forensic Sci. Int., 193, 63, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.09.007 Hicks, 2022, A logical framework for forensic DNA interpretation, Genes (Basel), 13, 10.3390/genes13060957 Aitken C.G.G., Taroni F., Bozza S. Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists. 3 ed. Sons JW, editor. Chichester 2021. Marquis, 2016, Discussion on how to implement a verbal scale in a forensic laboratory: Benefits, pitfalls and suggestions to avoid misunderstandings, Sci. Justice, 56, 364, 10.1016/j.scijus.2016.05.009 Hughes, 2021, Impact of surface roughness on the deposition of saliva and fingerprint residue on non-porous substrates, Forensic Chem., 23, 10.1016/j.forc.2021.100318 Kalafut, 2022, A mixed DNA profile controversy revisited, J. Forensic Sci., 67, 128, 10.1111/1556-4029.14912 Biedermann, 2016, Evaluation of forensic DNA traces when propositions of interest relate to activities: analysis and discussion of recurrent concerns, Front Genet., 7, 215, 10.3389/fgene.2016.00215 Jackson, 2019, “Source” or “activity” What is the level of issue in a criminal trial?, Significance, 16, 36, 10.1111/j.1740-9713.2019.01253.x