Support for the Death Penalty in Taiwan?: a Study of Value Conflict and Ambivalence

Asian Journal of Criminology - Tập 15 - Trang 163-183 - 2019
Susyan Jou1, Bill Hebenton2
1Graduate School of Criminology, National Taipei University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
2Department of Criminology, School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Tóm tắt

While a substantial number of studies have examined public opinion on the death penalty in the USA, and more recently parts of Asia, including China, very few empirical studies have considered support for the death penalty in Taiwan. This paper examines public attitudes in Taiwan and the role of ‘value conflict’ in attitudes to both death penalty abolition and in the context of alternatives. Using the results of 1016 respondents drawn from a national face-to-face sample (n = 2039) survey conducted by the Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty (TAEDP) in 2014, we demonstrate that public attitudes in Taiwan are simultaneously committed to many underlying values in conflict. The results also indicate that value conflict exists among the majority of the sample (more than 60 per cent) who are prepared to accept alternatives to abolition, and whom we can describe as ambivalent. Recognition of value conflict, ambivalence and the moral psychology underpinning public attitudes to the death penalty is essential, not only conceptually but to allow for a more appropriate and nuanced understanding of the abolitionist/retentionist debate.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abelson, R. P. (1988). Conviction. American Psychologist, 43, 267–275. Abbot, K. A. (1970). Harmony and individualism. Taipei: Orient Cultural Service. Academia Sinica. (2015) Survey Research on attitudes towards the death penalty and related values in Taiwan (C00292) [Data file]. Available from Survey Research Data Archive, Academia Sinica. https://doi.org/10.6141/TW-SRDA-C00292-1 Available at: https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/search/gensciitem/1531 (Accessed: 2 September 2017) Academia Sinica. (2017). Taiwan Social Change Surveys,VII-2, Executive Report. Nankang: Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica. Alarid, L. F., & Wang, H. M. (2001). Mercy and punishment: Buddhism and the death penalty. Social Justice, 28(1), 231–247. Alvarez, R. M., & Brehm, J. (1995). American ambivalence towards abortion policy: development of a heteroskedastic probit model of competing values. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 1055–1082. Amnesty International (2015) Taiwan: six executed in politically motivated decision. Available at https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2015/06/taiwan-six-executed/ (Accessed: 12 July 2019). Amnesty International (2018) Global report death sentences and executions. Available at: https://www.amnesty.org.uk/files/2019-04/Death Sentences and Executions 2018 REPORT web version.pdf (Accessed: 1 July 2019). Bae, S. (2011). International norms, domestic politics, and the death penalty: comparing Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Comparative Politics, 44(1), 41–58. Bakken, B. (2000). The exemplary society: human improvement, social control, and the dangers of modernity in China. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bakken, B. (2005). Introduction: crime, control and modernity in China. In B. Bakken (Ed.), Crime, Punishment and Policing in China. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.. Bakken, B. (2013). Capital punishment reform, public opinion, and penal elitism in the People’s Republic of China. In R. Hood & S. Deva (Eds.), Confronting Capital Punishment in Asia: Human Rights, Politics, and Public Opinion (pp. 187–204). New York: Oxford University Press. Bankowski, Z. (1981). The value of truth: fact scepticism re-visited. Legal Studies, 1, 253–260. Bohm, R. M., Vogel, R. E., & Maisto, A. A. (1993). Knowledge and death penalty opinion: a panel study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 21, 29–45. Brewer, M. B., & Chen, Y. R. (2007). Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review, 114(1), 133–151. British Broadcasting Corporation (2017) Taiwan’s top court rules in favour of same-sex marriage, 24 May 2017. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-40012047 (accessed 25 March 2019) British Broadcasting Corporation (2019) What’s behind the China-Taiwan divide? 2 January 2019. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-34729538 (accessed 25 March 2019). Butler, L., Unnever, J., Cullen, F. T., & Thielo, A. (2017). Public opinion about the death penalty. In R. Bohm & G. Lee (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook on Capital Punishment (pp. 55–70). New York: Routledge. Chen, E. L. (2001). Comments on the approach of constitutional review on death penalty from the view of the right to life. Martial Law Journal, 49(6), 20–34 (in Chinese). Chen, S. M., Huang, F. Y. & Wu, C. K. (2007). Abolition of the Death Penalty and its Alternative: A Research Report. Taiwan: Ministry of Justice. Choi, E., Jiang, S., & Lambert, E. (2017). Reasons for South Korean attitudes towards the death penalty: exploring the nexus between strong public support and history of misapplication. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 43(1), 61–76. Chiu, H. Y. (2006). Deterrence, dignity and the death penalty: analysing Taiwanese attitudes toward the abolition of the death penalty. Taiwanese Journal of Sociology, 37, 110–120 (in Chinese). Chou T.C. (2012) A study of police attitudes toward the abolition of capital punishment: a case study of a northern Taiwan police department. Master’s Thesis: National Taipei University, Taiwan. Unpublished. (in Chinese) Craig, S. C., Kane, J. G., & Martinez, M. D. (2002). Sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes you don’t: citizens’ ambivalence about abortion. Political Psychology, 23, 285–301. Craig, S. C., Martinez, M. D., Kane, J. C., & Gainous, J. (2005). Core values, value conflict, and citizens’ ambivalence about gay rights. Political Research Quarterly, 58(1), 5–17. Day, M., Fiske, S., Downing, E., & Trail, T. (2014). Shifting liberal and conservative attitudes using moral foundations theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(12), 1559–1573. Dikotter, F. (2002). Crime, punishment, and the prison in modern China, 1895-1949. New York: Columbia University Press. Dworkin, R. (2011). Justice for hedgehogs. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2012). The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science, 24(1), 56–62. Fernbach, P., Rogers, A., Fox, C., & Sloman, S. (2013). Political extremism is supported by an illusion of understanding. Psychological Science, 24(6), 939–946. Garland, D. (2010). Peculiar institution: America’s death penalty in an age of abolition. New York: Oxford University Press. Gallup International. (2000). Voice of the People Millennium Survey, 2000 [Computer file]. ICPSR24661-v1. AnnArbor: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research. Givelber, D., & Farrell, A. (2012). Not guilty: are the acquitted innocent? New York: New York University Press. Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Chapter two- moral foundations theory: the pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130. Greene, J. (2013). Moral Tribes. New York: Penguin Press. Greenberg, D., & West, V. (2008). Siting the death penalty internationally. Law & Social Inquiry, 33(2), 295–343. Gross, S. R., Holtz, R., & Miller, N. (1995). Attitude certainty. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences (pp. 215–245). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: why good people are divided by politics and religion. London: Allen Lane. Haidt, J. (2013). Moral psychology for the twenty-first century. Journal of Moral Education, 42, 281–297. Hampshire, S. (1983). Morality and conflict. In S. Hampshire (Ed.), Morality and Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Hewitt, J. D., Regoli, A., Regoli, R., & Iadicola, P. (2004). A comparison of death penalty opinion among university students in the United States and Taiwan. Crime and Criminal Justice International, 3, 73–102. Hofstede, G. (1979). Value systems in forty countries. In L. H. Eckensberger, W. J. Lonner, & Y. H. Poortinga (Eds.), Cross-Cultural Contributions to Psychology (pp. 389–407). Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger B.V. Ho, M. (2019). Taiwan's road to marriage equality: politics of legalizing same-sex marriage. The China Quarterly, 238, 482–503. Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (1997). Doing narrative research differently. London: Sage. Hood, R., & Hoyle, C. (2015). The death penalty: a worldwide perspective (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hou C W (1997) Public attitudes of harsher punishment in a disorderly time. Paper presented at the National Crime Problems Conference, Taipei, Taiwan. (in Chinese) Hsien, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in attitudes toward the death penalty. Criminal Policy and Crime Issues, 11, 23–50 (in Chinese). Hsu, C. S. (2014). Is retribution revenge? Contemporary retributivism and its implications for capital punishment. Law Review of Academia Sinica, 15, 1–76 (in Chinese). Hsu, C. S. (2015). Does communicative retributivism necessarily negate capital punishment ? Criminal Law and Philosophy, 9, 603–617. Huang, K. C., & Lin, C. C. (2014). Mock jury trials in Taiwan – paving the ground for introducing lay participation. Law and Human Behavior, 38(4), 367–377. Hwang, K. K. (1998). Two moralities: reinterpreting the findings of empirical research on moral reasoning in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 211–238. Jacoby, W. G. (2006). Value choices and american public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 706–723. Jahanbegloo, R. (2007). Conversations with Isaiah Berlin. London: Halban Jen F C (2015) Reflections of the predicament of the death penalty movement in Taiwan: victims’ family and public opinion. Master’s thesis. National Chiao-Tung University, Taiwan. Unpublished. (in Chinese). Jiang, S., & Wang, J. (2008). Correlates of support for capital punishment in China. International Criminal Justice Review, 18(1), 24–38. Jiang, S., Pilot, R., & Saito, T. (2010). Why Japanese support the death penalty? International Criminal Justice Review, 20(3), 302–316. Jiang, S. (2015). Public opinion and the death penalty. In B. Liang & H. Lu (Eds.), The Death Penalty in China: Policy, Practice and Reform (pp. 212–234). New York: Columbia University Press. Jiang, S., Hu, M., & Lambert, E. (2018). Predictors of death penalty views in China: an empirical comparison between college students and citizens. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(14), 4714–4735. Johnson, D., & Zimring, F. (2006). Taking capital punishment seriously. Asian Journal of Criminology, 1, 89–95. Johnson, D. T., & Zimring, F. E. (2009). The next frontier: national development, political change, and the death penalty in Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Johnson, D. T. (2013). Progress and problems in Japanese capital punishment. In R. Hood & S. Deva (Eds.), Confronting Capital Punishment in Asia: Human Rights, Politics, and Public Opinion (pp. 168–184). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jou, S., & Hebenton, B. (2011). Researching and explaining the punitive: lessons and reflections from a comparative empirical study of Taiwan and England and Wales. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 39, 12–36. Jou, S. (2014). Norwegian penal norms: political consensus, public knowledge, suitable sentiment and a hierarchy of otherness. National Taiwan University Law Review, 9(2), 283–315. Judicial Reform Foundation (2014). Special Report on Chiang Kuo Ching Case. Retrieved from http://www.jrf.org.tw/newjrf/rte/myform_detail.asp?id=2912. Accessed 4 April 2019 Keys, D. P., & Smith, J. Q. (2010). Capital punishment and the American political experience: continuing contradictions in the death penalty debate. USA: Xlibris Corporation. Kita, M., & Johnson, D. T. (2014). Framing capital punishment in Japan: avoidance, ambivalence, and atonement. Asian Journal of Criminology, 9, 221–240. Kleinstuber, R., Joy, S., & Mansley, E. A. (2017). Into the abyss: the unintended consequences of death penalty abolition. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change, 19(3), 185–206 Available at https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1196&context=jlasc (accessed 1 July 2019). Krosnick, J. A., & Abelson, R. P. (1992). The case for measuring attitude strength in surveys. In J. M. Tanur (Ed.), Questions About Questions: Inquiries Into The Cognitive Bases of Surveys (pp. 177–203). New York: Russell Sage. Kury, H., & Kuhlmann, A. (2014). Fear and punishment. In G. Bruinsma & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. New York: Springer. Lee, M. (2011). The genesis of ‘fear of crime’. Theoretical Criminology, 5, 467–485. Lester, D. (1998). The Death Penalty: Issues and Answers (2nd ed.). Springfield: Charles C. Thomas. Liao, F. T. (2008). From seventy-eight to zero: why executions declined after Taiwan’s democratization. Punishment & Society, 10(2), 153–170. Liao, F. T. (2010). The abolition of the death penalty in Taiwan: why a de facto moratorium was established and lost. Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law, 11(1), 1–22. McCord, D. (1998). Imagining a retributivist alternative to capital punishment. Florida Law Review, 50(1), 1–143. Miao, M. (2013). Capital punishment in China: a populist instrument of social governance. Theoretical Criminology, 17(2), 233–250. Ministry of Justice. (2014). The Report of the 2009 Pilot Project on Restorative Justice. Taipei: Ministry of Justice Available at: http://www.moj.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=33533&CtUnit=10810&BaseDSD=7&mp=001 (in Chinese). Muramatsu, K., Johnson, D. T., & Yano, K. (2018). The death penalty and homicide deterrence in Japan. Punishment & Society, 20(4), 432–457. National Research Council (2012) Deterrence and the death penalty. Committee on Deterrence and the Death Penalty, edited by Nagin DS and Pepper JV. Washington DC: The National Academies Press. Nelken, D. (2010). Comparative criminal justice: making sense of difference. London: Sage. Oberwittler, D., & Qi, S. (2009). Public opinion on the death penalty in China: results from a general population survey conducted in three provinces in 2007/8. Freiburg: Max Planck Institute for Foreign and Criminal Law Available at https://www.mpicc.de/files/pdf2/forschung_aktuell_41.pdf. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). New York: Academic Press. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press. Sarat, A., & Boulanger, C. (2005). The cultural lives of capital punishment: comparative perspectives. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. Sato, M. (2013). The death penalty in Japan: will the public tolerate abolition. New York: Springer Science and Business. Sato, M. (2018). From measuring support for the death penalty to justifying its retention: Japanese public opinion surveys on crime and punishment, 1956-2014. In J. Liu & S. Miyazawa (Eds.), Crime and Justice in Contemporary Japan (pp. 237–252). Cham: Springer. Savelsberg, J. (1999). Knowledge, domination and criminal punishment revisited. Punishment & Society, 1(1), 45–70. Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2008). Moral psychology: the cognitive science of morality: intuition and diversity: volume 2. Cambridge: Bradford Books. Smelser, N. (1998). The rational and the ambivalent in the social sciences. American Sociological Review, 63, 1–16. TAEDP (Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty) (2015) The Ma government’s shift of focus through use of the death penalty: a chronicle of events. Available at: http://www.taedp.org.tw/en/story/2841 (Accessed 12 July 2019). Taylor, D. G., Scheppele, K. L., & Stinchcombe, A. L. (1979). Salience of crime and support for harsher criminal sanctions. Social Problems, 26(4), 413–424. Tonry, M. (2011). Introduction: thinking about punishment. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Why punish? How Much? A Reader On Punishment (pp. 3–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Turow, S. (2004). Ultimate punishment: a lawyer's reflections on dealing with the death penalty. New York: Picador. Tyler, T. R., & Boeckmann, R. J. (1997). Three strikes and you are out. But why? The psychology of public support for punishing rule breakers. Law and Society Review, 31(2), 237–265. Unnever, J. D., Cullen, F. T., & Roberts, J. V. (2005). Not everyone strongly supports the death penalty: assessing weakly held attitudes about capital punishment. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 29(2), 197–216. Wang, Y. (2015). China’s death penalty in a State-Power-Based society. In B. Liang & H. Lu (Eds.), The Death Penalty in China: Policy, Practice and Reform (pp. 90–102). New York: Columbia University Press. Winter, J. (2016). Justice for hedgehogs, conceptual authenticity for foxes: ronald dworkin on value conflicts. Res Publica, 22, 463–479. World Press Freedom Index (2018) World press freedom index. Reporters Without Borders. Available at https://rsf.org/en/ranking/2018 (Accessed 1 July 2019). Wu, B. (1997). Correlates of public opinion toward punishment: the Taiwanese case. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 21(1), 119–129. Wu, Y., Sun, I., & Wu, Z. (2011). Support for the death penalty: Chinese and American college students compared. Punishment & Society, 13(3), 354–376. Yang, S. (2016). Investigation of the Government’s Maintenance of Public Security and Satisfaction in the First Half of 2016. Chiayi: National Chung- Cheng University Crime Research Centre (in Chinese). Available at: http://deptcrc.ccu.edu.tw/examine/showExamine/50. Zimring, F. E. (2003). The Contradictions of American Capital Punishment. New york: Oxford University Press.