A Systematic Review of Intra- and Postoperative Complication Reporting and Grading in Urological Surgery: Understanding the Pitfalls and a Path Forward

Dixit, 2018, A review of the Australian healthcare system: a policy perspective, SAGE Open Med, 6, 10.1177/2050312118769211 Mitropoulos, 2018, Validation of the Clavien-Dindo grading system in urology by the European Association of Urology Guidelines Ad Hoc Panel, Eur Urol Focus, 4, 608, 10.1016/j.euf.2017.02.014 Soliman, 2022, There is a need for a universal language in the reporting and grading of complication and intervention events to ensure comparability and improvement of surgical care, Eur Urol, 81, 440, 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.12.022 Cacciamani, 2020, Quality assessment of intraoperative adverse event reporting during 29 227 robotic partial nephrectomies: a systematic review and cumulative analysis, Eur Urol Oncol, 3, 780, 10.1016/j.euo.2020.04.003 Roussel, 2020, Rates and predictors of perioperative complications in cytoreductive nephrectomy: analysis of the registry for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, Eur Urol Oncol, 3, 523, 10.1016/j.euo.2020.04.006 Dell’Oglio, 2021, Impact of the implementation of the EAU guidelines recommendation on reporting and grading of complications in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a systematic review, Eur Urol, 80, 129, 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.04.030 Mostafid, 2021, Best practices to optimise quality and outcomes of transurethral resection of bladder tumours, Eur Urol Oncol, 4, 12, 10.1016/j.euo.2020.06.010 Page, 2021, The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews, Syst Rev, 10, 89, 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4 Freites-Martinez, 2021, Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE – version 5.0) to evaluate the severity of adverse events of anticancer therapies, Actas Dermosifiliogr, 112, 90, 10.1016/j.ad.2019.05.009 Dindo, 2004, Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey, Ann Surg, 240, 205, 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae Strong, 2015, Development and assessment of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center’s Surgical Secondary Events grading system, Ann Surg Oncol, 22, 1061, 10.1245/s10434-014-4141-4 Strasberg, 2009, The Accordion severity grading system of surgical complications, Ann Surg, 250, 177, 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181afde41 Slankamenac, 2013, The Comprehensive Complication Index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity, Ann Surg, 258, 1, 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318296c732 Furrer, 2019, The Comprehensive Complication Index CCI: a proposed modification to optimize short-term complication reporting after cystectomy and urinary diversion, Urol Oncol, 37, 291.e9, 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.12.013 Kazaryan, 2013, Morbidity assessment in surgery: refinement proposal based on a concept of perioperative adverse events, ISRN Surg, 2013, 10.1155/2013/625093 Kaafarani, 2014, Derivation and validation of a novel severity classification for intraoperative adverse events, J Am Coll Surg, 218, 1120, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.060 Francis, 2018, EAES classification of intraoperative adverse events in laparoscopic surgery, Surg Endosc, 32, 3822, 10.1007/s00464-018-6108-1 Biyani, 2020, Intraoperative adverse incident classification (EAUiaiC) by the European Association of Urology ad hoc Complications Guidelines Panel, Eur Urol, 77, 601, 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.11.015 Dell-Kuster, 2020, Prospective validation of classification of intraoperative adverse events (ClassIntra): international, multicentre cohort study, BMJ, 370 Martin, 2002, Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature, Ann Surg, 235, 803, 10.1097/00000658-200206000-00007 Mitropoulos, 2012, Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU Guidelines Panel assessment and recommendations, Eur Urol, 61, 341, 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.033 Cacciamani, 2022, Eur Urol Focus, 8, 1847, 10.1016/j.euf.2022.01.018 Khuri, 1998, The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program, Ann Surg, 228, 491, 10.1097/00000658-199810000-00006 Rosenthal, 2015, Definition and classification of intraoperative complications (CLASSIC): Delphi study and pilot evaluation, World J Surg, 39, 1663, 10.1007/s00268-015-3003-y Sathianathen, 2022, Re: Pietro Piazza, Luca Sarchi, Stefano Puliatti, Carlo Andrea Bravi, Sophie Knipper, Alexandre Mottrie. The unsolved issue of reporting of late complications in urology. Eur Urol 2021;80:527–528, Eur Urol, 81, e11, 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.09.033 Sloan, 2020, The cost to Medicare of bladder cancer care, Eur Urol Oncol, 3, 515, 10.1016/j.euo.2019.01.015 Cacciamani, 2021, Impact of pelvic lymph node dissection and its extent on perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis, Eur Urol Oncol, 4, 134, 10.1016/j.euo.2021.02.001 Sathianathen, 2022, Re: Impact of the implementation of the EAU guidelines recommendation on reporting and grading of complications in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a systematic review, Eur Urol, 81, 214, 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.11.029 Soliman, 2022, Active involvement of nursing staff in reporting and grading complication-intervention events—protocol and results of the CAMUS Pilot Nurse Delphi Study, BJUI Compass, 3, 466, 10.1002/bco2.173 Wehkamp, 2021, Enhancing patient safety by integrating ethical dimensions to critical incident reporting systems, BMC Med Ethics, 22, 26, 10.1186/s12910-021-00593-8 Stover, 2021, Using an implementation science approach to implement and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) initiatives in routine care settings, Qual Life Res, 30, 3015, 10.1007/s11136-020-02564-9 Soliman, 2022, Protocol for CAMUS Delphi study: a consensus on comprehensive reporting and grading of complications after urological surgery, Eur Urol Focus, 8, 1493, 10.1016/j.euf.2022.01.016