Efficacy and Safety of Romosozumab Among Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis and Mild-to-Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease

Oxford University Press (OUP) - Tập 37 Số 8 - Trang 1437-1445 - 2020
Paul D. Miller1, Jonathan D. Adachi2, Ben‐Hur Albergaria3, Angela M. Cheung4, Arkadi Chines5, Evelien Gielen6, Bente Langdahl7, Akimitsu Miyauchi8, Mary Oates5, Ian R. Reid9, Norma Ruiz Santiago5, Mark Vanderkelen10, Zhenxun Wang5, Zhigang Yu5
1Colorado Center for Bone Health Lakewood CO USA
2St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
3Federal University of Espirito Santo, Espirito Santo Research and Osteoporosis Center Vitória Brazil
4Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
5Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA USA
6Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Public Health and Primary Care KU Leuven & Center for Metabolic Bone Diseases, UZ Leuven Leuven Belgium
7Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
8Miyauchi Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
9University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
10UCB S.A., Brussels, Belgium

Tóm tắt

ABSTRACT Patients with osteoporosis and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of fracture and associated negative outcomes, including increased mortality. The present post hoc analysis of two randomized, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trials—Fracture Study in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis (FRAME) and Active-Controlled Fracture Study in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis at High Risk (ARCH)—investigated the efficacy and safety of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and mild-to-moderate CKD. The analysis included data from 7147 patients from FRAME and 4077 from ARCH. Eighty-one percent of patients from FRAME and 85% from ARCH had mild or moderate reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline, and part of this reduction is likely age related. During the 1-year double-blind phases of the trials, patients received romosozumab 210 mg sc or placebo monthly in FRAME and romosozumab 210 mg sc monthly or alendronate 70 mg po weekly in ARCH. Bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck and vertebral and nonvertebral fractures were assessed at baseline and month 12. In both trials, the least-square mean percent change from baseline BMD was significantly greater in the romosozumab groups versus controls across all kidney function categories at month 12. Romosozumab reduced the relative risk of new vertebral fractures at month 12 among patients with eGFR of 30–59, 60–89, and ≥90 mL/min by 72% (95% confidence interval [CI] 14–91; p = 0.017), 70% (40–85; p < 0.001), and 84% (30–96; p = 0.005), respectively, in FRAME versus placebo, and by 51% (5–75; p = 0.04), 19% (−28 to 49; p = 0.39), and 57% (1–81, p = 0.04), respectively, in ARCH versus alendronate. Incidences of adverse events, asymptomatic decreases in serum calcium, and evolution of kidney function during the studies were similar across all baseline kidney function groups. Romosozumab is an effective treatment option for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and mild-to-moderate reduction in kidney function, with a similar safety profile across different levels of kidney function. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2019

Klawansky, 2003, Relationship between age, renal function and bone mineral density in the US population, Osteoporos Int., 14, 570, 10.1007/s00198-003-1435-y

Bover, 2017, Osteoporosis, bone mineral density and CKD-MBD: treatment considerations, J Nephrol., 30, 677, 10.1007/s40620-017-0404-z

Chen, 2018, Association of renal function with bone mineral density and fracture risk in the longitudinal aging study Amsterdam, Osteoporos Int., 29, 2129, 10.1007/s00198-018-4592-8

Miller, 2009, Fragility fractures in chronic kidney disease: an opinion-based approach, Cleveland Clinic J Med., 76, 715, 10.3949/ccjm.76a.08108

Nikolas, 2006, Relationship between moderate to severe kidney disease and hip fracture in the United States, J Am Soc Nephrol., 17, 3223, 10.1681/ASN.2005111194

Khairallah, 2018, Management of osteoporosis in CKD, Clin J Am Soc Nephrol., 13, 962, 10.2215/CJN.11031017

Shoback, 2020, Pharmacological management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: an Endocrine Society guideline update, J Clin Endocrinol Metab., 105, 587, 10.1210/clinem/dgaa048

Camacho, 2020, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis – 2020 update, Endocr Pract., 26, 564, 10.4158/GL-2020-0524

Eastell, 2019, Pharmacological management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline, J Clin Endocrinol Metab., 104, 1595, 10.1210/jc.2019-00221

Nitta, 2017, Management of osteoporosis in chronic kidney disease, Intern Med., 56, 3271, 10.2169/internalmedicine.8618-16

Jamal, 2011, Effects of denosumab on fracture and bone mineral density by level of kidney function, J Bone Miner Res., 26, 1829, 10.1002/jbmr.403

Jalleh, 2018, Denosumab-induced severe hypocalcaemia in chronic kidney disease, Case Rep Nephrol., 2018, 7384763

Block, 2012, A single-dose study of denosumab in patients with various degrees of renal impairment, J Bone Miner Res., 27, 1471, 10.1002/jbmr.1613

Bilezikian, 2019, Abaloparatide in patients with mild or moderate renal impairment: results from the ACTIVE phase 3 trial, Curr Med Res Opin., 35, 2097, 10.1080/03007995.2019.1656955

Miller, 2007, Teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and mild or moderate renal impairment, Osteoporos Int., 18, 59, 10.1007/s00198-006-0189-8

Nishikawa, 2016, Safety and effectiveness of daily teriparatide for osteoporosis in patients with severe stages of chronic kidney disease: post hoc analysis of a postmarketing observational study, Clin Interv Aging., 11, 1653, 10.2147/CIA.S120175

Cosman, 2016, Romosozumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, N Engl J Med., 375, 1532, 10.1056/NEJMoa1607948

Saag, 2017, Romosozumab or alendronate for fracture prevention in women with osteoporosis, N Engl J Med., 377, 1417, 10.1056/NEJMoa1708322

Levey, 2006, Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate, Ann Intern Med., 145, 247, 10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00004

Jamal, 2007, Alendronate treatment in women with normal to severely impaired renal function: an analysis of the Fracture Intervention Trial, J Bone Miner Res., 22, 503, 10.1359/jbmr.070112

Bluic, 2009, Mortality risk associated with low-trauma osteoporotic fracture and subsequent fracture in men and women, JAMA., 301, 513, 10.1001/jama.2009.50

Cauley, 2013, Public health impact of osteoporosis, J Gerontol., 68, 1243, 10.1093/gerona/glt093

Lewiecki, 2011, Sclerostin: a novel target for intervention in the treatment of osteoporosis, Discov Med., 12, 263

Lim, 2017, Profile of romosozumab and its potential in the management of osteoporosis, Drug Des Devel Ther., 11, 1221, 10.2147/DDDT.S127568

Evenity [package insert], 2019

Alani, 2017, Establishing the presence or absence of chronic kidney disease: uses and limitations of formulas estimating the glomerular filtration rate, World J Methodol., 7, 73, 10.5662/wjm.v7.i3.73

Botev, 2011, The clinician and estimation of glomerular filtration rate by creatinine-based formulas: current limitations and quo vadis, Clin J Am Soc Nephrol., 6, 937, 10.2215/CJN.09241010

Hallan, 2009, Combining GFR and albuminuria to classify CKD improves prediction of ESRD, J Am Soc Nephrol., 20, 1069, 10.1681/ASN.2008070730

Rothwell, 2005, Treating individuals 2. Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications and interpretation, Lancet., 365, 176, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17709-5