Environmental impact assessment of urban land use transitions—A context-sensitive approach

Land Use Policy - Tập 26 - Trang 414-424 - 2009
Henning Nuissl1, Dagmar Haase2, Martin Lanzendorf3, Heidi Wittmer4
1Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Urban and Environmental Sociology, Permoserstraße 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
2Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoserstraße 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
3Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Urban Ecology, Environmental Planning and Transport, Permoserstraße 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
4Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Economics, Permoserstraße 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alcamo, 2005, Changes in Nature's Balance Sheet: model-based estimation of future Worldwide Ecosystem Services, Ecology and Society, 10, 19, 10.5751/ES-01551-100219 Anderstig, 1999, Modelling land-use and transport interaction: policy analyses using the IMREL model, 308 Batty, M., Besussi, E., Chin, N., 2003. Traffic, urban growth and suburban sprawl. CASA paper 70, UCL London. BBR, 2007. http://www.bbr.bund.de/cln_007/DE/Home. Bengston, 2005, An analysis of the public discourse about urban sprawl in the United States: monitoring concern about a major threat to forests, Forest Policy and Economics, 7, 745, 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.03.010 Bertoni, 2006, Inondations urbaines en Amérique Latine: réflexions sur le rôle des facteurs de risque, Frontiers in Flood Research, 305, 1 Brandt, 2000, Monitoring multi-functional terrestrial landscapes, 157 Breuste, 1998 Bundesregierung, 2004. Fortschrittsbericht 2004, Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 15/2004, Berlin. Camagni, 2002, Urban mobility and urban form: the social and environmental costs of different patterns of urban expansion, Ecological Economics, 40, 199, 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00254-3 CEC (Commission of the European Communities), 1999. ESDP – European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union. Adopted by the Ministers for Spatial Planning at the Potsdam Council on 10 and 11 May 1999. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. CEC (Commission of the European Communities), 2001. A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development. COM(2001)264 final. Brussels. CEC (Commission of the European Communities), 2004. Impact Assessment Guidelines. SEC(2005)791. CEC (Commission of the European Communities), 2004. Commission's Communication ‘Towards a Thematic Strategy in the Urban Environment’. COM 2004(60)final. Brussels. Cervero, 1998 CoE (Council of Europe), 2000. European Landscape Convention. Treaty 176 of the Council of Europe, Strasbourg. Collin, 2003, Assessing groundwater vulnerability to pollution to promote sustainable urban and rural development, Journal of Cleaner Production, 11, 727, 10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00131-2 Couch, 2005, Decline and sprawl: an evolving type of urban development—observed in Liverpool and Leipzig, European Planning Studies, 13, 117, 10.1080/0965431042000312433 Curran, 2004, Completing the picture: the challenges of bringing “Consumption” into the population–environment equation, Population & Environment, 26, 107, 10.1007/s11111-004-0837-x Deal, 2004, Spatial dynamic modelling and urban land use transformation: a simulation approach to assessing the costs of urban sprawl, Ecological Economics, 51, 79, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.04.008 De Groot, 2002, A typology for the description, classification and valuation of Ecosystem Functions Goods and Services, Ecological Economics, 41, 393, 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7 Dosch, F., 2001. Ressourcenschonende Flächennutzung in den Modellregionen. BBR Working Group “Regions of Future” (Ed). Bilanz des Wettbewerbs – Fachliche Perspektiven (http://www.zukunftsregionen.de/). Emmerling, 2002, Discriminating factors of spatial variability of soil quality parameters at landscape scale, Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 165, 706, 10.1002/jpln.200290007 EEA (European Environmental Agency), 2006. Urban sprawl in Europe – The ignored challenge. EEA Report 10/2006. Copenhagen. Ewing, 1994, Causes, characteristics, and effects of sprawl: a literature review, Environmental Planning and Urban Issues, 21, 1 Ewing, 1997, Counterpoint: is Los-Angeles-style sprawl desirable?, Journal of American Planning Association, 63, 107, 10.1080/01944369708975728 Finco, 2001, Pathways to urban sustainability, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 3, 289, 10.1002/jepp.94 Forman, 1986 Galster, 2001, Wrestling sprawl to the ground: defining and measuring an elusive concept, Housing Policy Debate, 12, 681, 10.1080/10511482.2001.9521426 Ganser, 2007, Brownfield Development: are we using the right targets? Evidence from England and Germany, European Planning Studies, 15, 603, 10.1080/09654310600852654 2004, 19 German Council of Sustainable Development, 2004. Sustainability strategy of the German government. Berlin. Geurs, 2004, Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions, Journal of Transport Geography, 12, 127, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005 Glugla, G., Fürtig, G., 1997. Dokumentation zur Anwendung des Rechenprogramms ABIMO. Mimeograph, Bundesanstalt für Gewässerkunde, Berlin. Haase, 2007, Does urban sprawl drive changes in the water balance and policy? The case of Leipzig (Germany) 1870–2003, Landscape and Urban Planning, 80, 1, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.03.011 Haase, 2007, Changes to Saxon landscapes—analysing historical maps to approach current environmental issues, Land Use Policy, 24, 248, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.09.003 Hasse, 2003, Land resource impact indicators of urban sprawl, Applied Geography, 23, 159, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2003.08.002 Hirzel, 2002, Ecological-niche factor analysis—how to compute habitat-suitability maps without absence data?, Ecology, 83, 2027, 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2027:ENFAHT]2.0.CO;2 Hirzel, A., Hausser, J., Perrin, F., 2001. Biomapper 2.0. Laboratory for Conservation Biology, Institute of Ecology, University of Lausanne, http://www.unil.ch/biomapper/enfa.html, 05.08.2003. Johnson, 2001, Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: a survey of the literature and proposed research agenda, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning A, 33, 717, 10.1068/a3327 Kasanko, 2006, Are European cities becoming dispersed?, Landscape and Urban Planning, 77, 111, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.003 Martínez, 1995, MUSSA Model: the theoretical framework, 333 McGarigal, K., Marks, B., 1995. FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Quantifying Landscape Structure; Auszug aus USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report PNW, GTR 351. MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), 2005 Mehnert, 2005, Bewertung der Habitateignung von Stadtstrukturen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Grün- und Brachflächen am Beispiel der Stadt Leipzig, Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung, 2, 54 Messer, 1997 Moeckel, 2003, Microsimulation of Land Use Muniz, 2005, Urban Form and the ecological footprint of commuting. The case of Barcelona, Ecological Economics, 55, 499, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.008 Naveh, 2001, Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapes, Landscape and Urban Planning, 57, 269, 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00209-2 Nuissl, 2005, The ‘production’ of urban sprawl in eastern Germany as a phenomenon of post-socialist transformation, Cities, 22, 123, 10.1016/j.cities.2005.01.002 OECD, 1997 Patel, 2007, Participatory scenario construction in land use analysis: an insight into the experiences created by stakeholder involvement in the Northern Mediterranean, Land Use Policy, 24, 546, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.02.005 Pauleit, 2005, Modeling the environmental impacts of urban land use and land cover change—a study in Merseyside, UK, Landscape Urban Plan, 71, 295, 10.1016/S0169-2046(04)00083-0 Ravetz, 2000 Rounsevell, 2006, A coherent set of future land use change scenarios for Europe, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 114, 57, 10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.027 Samaniego, 2006, Simulation of the impacts of landuse/cover and climatic changes on the runoff characteristics at the mesoscale, Ecological Modelling, 196, 45, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.01.005 Schetke, S., Haase, D., 2008. Multi-criteria assessment of socio-environmental aspects in shrinking cities. Experiences from Eastern Germany. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, in press. Schröter-Schlaack, C., Ring, I., 2006. Internationale Erfahrungen zu ökologischem Finanzausgleich und handelbaren Zertifikaten. In: Meyer, C., Schweppe-Kraft, B. (Hrsg.), Integration ökologischer Aspekte in die Finanzpolitik. BfN-Skripten 167, Berlin, pp. 64–80. Siedentop, 2006, Siedlungsstruktur- und Mobilitätsprofile suburbaner Gemeindetypen, Berichte zur deutschen Landeskunde, 80, 415 2002 Torrens, P.M., Alberti, M., 2000. Measuring Sprawl, CASA paper 27, UCL London. Turner, M.G., R.H. Gardner, R.V. O’Neill, 2001. Landscape ecology in theory and practice. New York. Walz, 2004, Sächsische Landschaften im Wandel – Auswertung historischer Kartenwerke für umweltwissenschaftliche Fragestellungen, Europa Regional, 11, 126 Weber, 2006, Tearing the city down: understanding demolition activity in gentrifying neighbourhoods, Journal of Urban Affairs, 28, 19, 10.1111/j.0735-2166.2006.00257.x Weng, 2007, Spatiotemporal changes of landscape pattern in response to urbanization, Landscape and Urban Planning, 81, 341, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.01.009 Wiek, 2006, Functions of scenarios in transition processes, Futures, 38, 740, 10.1016/j.futures.2005.12.003 Wiek, 2005, Solution spaces for decision-making—a sustainability assessment tool for city-regions, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25, 589, 10.1016/j.eiar.2004.09.009 Wu, 2002, Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: an idiosyncratic synthesis, Landscape Ecology, 17, 355, 10.1023/A:1020561630963