Diagnosing diagnostic tests: evaluating the assumptions underlying the estimation of sensitivity and specificity in the absence of a gold standard

Andersen, 1997, Re: Bayesian estimation of disease prevalence and the parameters of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard, Am. J. Epidemiol., 145, 290, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009102 Black, 2002, Estimating disease prevalence in the absence of a gold standard, Stat. Med., 21, 2653, 10.1002/sim.1178 Dendukuri, 2001, Bayesian approaches to modeling the conditional dependence between multiple diagnostic tests, Biometrics, 57, 158, 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00158.x Enøe, 2001, Estimation of sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of two serologic tests for the detection of antibodies against Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotype 2 in the absence of a reference test (gold standard), Prev. Vet. Med., 51, 227, 10.1016/S0167-5877(01)00226-4 Enøe, 2000, Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests and disease prevalence when the true state of disease is unknown, Prev. Vet. Med., 45, 61, 10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00117-3 Gardner, 2000, Conditional dependence between tests affects the diagnosis and surveillance of animal diseases, Prev. Vet. Med., 45, 107, 10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00119-7 Hanson, T., Johnson, W., Gardner, I. Hierarchical models for estimating herd prevalence and test accuracy in the absence of a gold-standard. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 8 (2), 223–239. Hui, 1980, Estimating the error rates of diagnostic tests, Biometrics, 36, 167, 10.2307/2530508 Johnson, 2001, Screening without a “gold standard”: the Hui–Walter paradigm revisited, Am. J. Epidemiol., 153, 921, 10.1093/aje/153.9.921 Joseph, 1995, Bayesian estimation of disease prevalence and the parameters of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard, Am. J. Epidemiol., 141, 263, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117428 Neath, 1997, On the efficacy of bayesian inference for nonidentifiable models, Am. Stat., 51, 225 Nielsen, 2002, Maximum-likelihood estimation of sensitivity and specificity of ELISAs and faecal culture for diagnosis of paratuberculosis, Prev. Vet. Med., 53, 191, 10.1016/S0167-5877(01)00280-X Nielsen, 2001, Diagnostic techniques for paratuberculosis, Bull. Int. Dairy Fed., 362, 5 Qu, 1996, Random effects models for evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests, Biometrics, 52, 797, 10.2307/2533043 Spiegelhalter, 2000, Bayesian methods in health technology assessment: a review, Health Technol. Assess., 4, 1, 10.3310/hta4380 Vacek, 1985, The effect of conditional dependence on the evaluation of diagnostic tests, Biometrics, 41, 959, 10.2307/2530967 Yang, 1997, Latent variable modeling of diagnostic accuracy, Biometrics, 53, 948, 10.2307/2533555