Fuzzy TOPSIS method with ordered fuzzy numbers for flow control in a manufacturing system

Kashfi, 2015, A model for selecting suitable dispatching rule in FMS based on fuzzy multi attribute group decision making, Prod. Eng., 9, 237, 10.1007/s11740-015-0603-1 Findeisen, 1974 Kost, 2014 Barenji, 2014, A multi-agent RFID-enabled distributed control system for a flexible manufacturing shop, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 71, 1773, 10.1007/s00170-013-5597-2 Li, 2012, Deadlock control of automated manufacturing systems based on Petri nets-a literature review, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernetics Part C: Appl. Rev., 42, 437, 10.1109/TSMCC.2011.2160626 K. Franczok, A method to model and design of hierarchical models of discrete processes, using Petri nets and elements of multi-agent control (in Polish) PAR 1, 2014, 98–104. Chen, 2014, Optimal supervisory control of flexible manufacturing systems by Petri nets: a set classification approach, IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., 11, 549, 10.1109/TASE.2013.2241762 Başak, 2015, Petri net based decision system modeling in real-time scheduling and control of flexible automotive manufacturing systems, Comput. Ind. Eng., 86, 116, 10.1016/j.cie.2014.09.024 Moore, 1996, Petri net models of flexible and automated manufacturing systems: a survey, Int. J. Prod. Res., 34, 3001, 10.1080/00207549608905075 Sanders, 2013, AI tools for use in assembly automation and some examples of recent applications, Assembly Autom., 33, 184, 10.1108/01445151311306717 Sadeghian, 2016, A decision support system based on artificial neural network and fuzzy analytic network process for selection of machine tools in a flexible manufacturing system, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 82, 1795, 10.1007/s00170-015-7440-4 Ulusoy, 1997, Ş. Bilge, A genetic algorithm approach to the simultaneous scheduling of machines and automated guided vehicles, Comput. Operat. Res., 24, 335, 10.1016/S0305-0548(96)00061-5 Umar, 2015, Hybrid multiobjective genetic algorithms for integrated dynamic scheduling and routing of jobs and automated-guided vehicle (AGV) in flexible manufacturing systems (FMS) environment, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 81, 2123, 10.1007/s00170-015-7329-2 Jerald, 2005, Scheduling optimisation of flexible manufacturing systems using particle swarm optimisation algorithm, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 25, 964, 10.1007/s00170-003-1933-2 Singh, 2016, Meta-hierarchical-heuristic-mathematical- model of loading problems in flexible manufacturing system for development of an intelligent approach, Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput., 7, 177 Ishii, 1994, A mixed dispatching rule approach in FMS scheduling, Int. J. Flex Manuf. Syst., 6, 69, 10.1007/BF01324876 Churchman, 2016, An approximate measure of value, J. Operat. Res. Soc. Am., 2, 1954 Saaty, 1980 Roy, 1993 Brans, 1982, L’ingénierie de la décision; Elaboration d’instruments d’aide à la decision. La méthode PROMETHEE Hwang, 1981 Barros, 2015, An analysis of African airlines efficiency with two-stage TOPSIS and neural networks, J. Air Transp. Manage.t, 44–45, 90, 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.03.002 Chen, 2015, Road safety risk evaluation by means of improved entropy TOPSIS–RSR, Saf. Sci., 79, 39, 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.05.006 Ansarifar, 2015, A new technique to evaluate the effect of chitosan on properties of deep-fried Kurdish cheese nuggets by TOPSIS, LWT Food Sci. Technol., 62, 1211, 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.01.051 Chen, 2000, Extension of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 114, 1, 10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1 Gupta, 2012, A fuzzy multi criteria decision making approach for vendor evaluation in a supply chain, Intersci. Manage. Rev., 2, 10 Sengul, 2015, Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey, Renew. Energ., 75, 617, 10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.045 Arabzad, 2015, Employing fuzzy TOPSIS and SWOT for supplier selection and order allocation problem, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 76, 803, 10.1007/s00170-014-6288-3 Yayla, 2012, Fuzzy TOPSIS method in supplier selection and application in the garment industry, FIBRES TEXTILES Eastern Eur., 4, 20 Chen, 2011, Structured methodology for supplier selection and evaluation in a supply chain, Inform. Sci., 181, 1651, 10.1016/j.ins.2010.07.026 Roshandel, 2013, Evaluating and selecting the supplier in detergent production industry using hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS, Appl. Math. Modell., 37, 10170, 10.1016/j.apm.2013.05.043 Chou, 2012, A fuzzy TOPSIS approach for medical provider selection and evaluation Beskese, 2015, Landfill site selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS: a case study for Istanbul, Environ. Earth Sci., 73, 513 Mahdevari, 2014, Human health and safety risks management in underground coal mines using fuzzy TOPSIS, Sci. Total Environ., 488–489, 85, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.076 Pei, 2013, Simplification of fuzzy multiple attribute decision making in production line evaluation, Knowl. Based Syst., 47, 23, 10.1016/j.knosys.2013.03.010 Ic, 2015, Topsis based Taguchi method for multi-response simulation optimization of flexible manufacturing system, 2147 Chatterjee, 2014, Investigating the effect of normalization norms in flexible manufacturing system selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods, J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Rev., 7, 141, 10.25103/jestr.073.23 Jain, 2013, Ranking of flexibility in flexible manufacturing system by using a combined multiple attribute decision making method, Global J. Flexible Syst. Manage., 14, 125, 10.1007/s40171-013-0038-5 Pei, 2015, A note on the TOPSIS method in MADM problems with linguistic evaluations, Appl. Soft Comput., 36, 24, 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.06.042 Azimi, 2011, Optimization the automated guided vehicles rules for a multiple-load AGV system using simulation and SAW VICOR and TOPSIS methods in a FMS environment, 23rd European Modeling and Simulation Symposium EMSS, 17 Kosiński, 2002, Drawback of fuzzy arithmetics −new intuitions and propositions, in T. Burczyński, 231 Kacprzak, 2016, The application of ordered fuzzy numbers in the SAW procedure, 71 E. Roszkowska, D. Kacprzak. 2016. The fuzzy saw and fuzzy TOPSIS procedures based on ordered fuzzy numbers. Inf. Sci. 369, C (November 2016), 564-584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.07.044. Rudnik, 2015, The fuzzy TOPSIS method using the ordered fuzzy numbers (in Polish), 958 Kosiński, 2003, Ordered fuzzy numbers, Bull. Polish Acad. Sci., 51, 327 Kosiński, 2005, Calculus with fuzzy numbers, 3490, 21 Kosiński, 2006, On fuzzy number calculus, Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., 16, 51 Zadeh, 1965, Fuzzy sets, Inform. Control, 8, 338, 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X Dubois, 1980 Dubois, 1979, Fuzzy real algebra: some results, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 2, 327, 10.1016/0165-0114(79)90005-8 Chen, 2009, Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking fuzzy numbers using a-cuts, belief features and signal/noise ratios, Expert Syst. Appl., 36, 5576, 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.06.112 Melin, 2007, Analysis and design of intelligent systems using soft computing techniques, Adv. Soft Comput., 41 Prokopowicz, 2015, The directed compatibility between ordered fuzzy numbers − a base tool for a direction sensitive fuzzy information processing, Artif. Intell. Soft Comput., 9119, 249, 10.1007/978-3-319-19324-3_23 Kaucher, 1980, Interval analysis in the extended interval space IR, Fundam. Numer. Comput. (Comput.–Orient. Numer. Anal.), 2, 33, 10.1007/978-3-7091-8577-3_3 Roszkowska, 2015, Application of fuzzy TOPSIS to scoring the negotiation offers in ill-structured negotiation problems, Eur. J. Operat. Res., 242, 920, 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.10.050 Kahraman, 2007, A two phase multi-attribute decision-making approach for new product introduction, Inform. Sci., 177, 1567, 10.1016/j.ins.2006.09.008 Garcia-Cascales, 2012, On rank reversal and TOPSIS method, Math. Comput. Modell., 56, 123, 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.12.022 Wang, 2006, An approach to avoiding rank reversal in AHP, Decis. Support Syst., 42, 1474, 10.1016/j.dss.2005.12.002 Wang, 2009, On rank reversal in decision analysis, Math. Comput. Modell., 39, 1221, 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.06.019 Chen, 2006, A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 102, 289, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.03.009