Male rank and female choice in the bank vole, Clethrionomys glareolus

Bronson, F.H. and Caroom, D., 1971. Preputial gland of the male house mice: attractant function. J. Reprod. Fert., 25: 279–282. Brown, J.C. and Williams, J.D., 1972. The rodent preputial glands. Mammal. Rev., 15: 131–134. D'Amado, F.R., 1988. Effects of male social status on reproductive success and on behavior in mice (Mus musculus). J. Comp. Psychol., 102: 146–151. Drickamer, L.C., 1992. Oestrous female house mice discriminate dominant from subordinate males and sons of dominant from sons of subordinate males by odour cues. Anim. Behav., 43: 868–870. Ferkin, M.H., Sorokin, E.S., Renfroe, M.W. and Johnston, R.E., 1994. Attractiveness of male odors to females varies directly with plasma testosterone concentration in meadow voles. Physiol. Behav., 55: 347–353. Hoffmeyer, I., 1982. Responses of female bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) to dominant versus subordinate conspecific males and to urine odors from dominant versus subordinate males. Behav. Neural. Biol., 36: 178–188. Huck, U.W. and Banks, E.M., 1982a. Differential attraction of females to dominant males: olfactory discrimination and mating preference in the brown lemming (Lemmus trimucronatus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 30: 217–222. Huck, U.W. and Banks, E.M., 1982b. Male dominance status, female choice and mating success in the brown lemming, Lemmus trimucronatus. Anim. Behav., 30: 665–675. Huck, U.W., Lisk, R.D., Allison, J.C. and van Dongen, C.G., 1986. Determinants of mating success in the golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus): social dominance and mating tactics under seminatural conditions. Anim. Behav., 34: 971–989. Kapusta, J., Marchlewska-Koj, A., Olejniczak, P. and Kruczek, M., 1996. Removal of the olfactory system modifies male bank vole behaviour in the presence of females. Behav. Process., 37: 39–45. Kruczek, M., 1994. Responses of female bank voles Clethrionomys glareolus to male chemosignals. Acta Theriol., 39: 249–255. Kruczek, M. and Mach, A., 1995. Behavioural responses of bank vole females to the odour of urine from conspecifics. J. Reprod. Fert. Abstract Series, 15: 53. Kruczek, M. and Marchlewska-Koj, A., 1986. Puberty delay of bank vole females in high density population. Biol. Reprod., 35: 537–541. Kruczek, M., Marchlewska-Koj, A. and Drickamer, L.C., 1989. Social inhibition of sexual maturation in female and male bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus). Acta Theriol., 34: 479–485. Kruczek, M. and Pochroń, E., 1997. Chemical signals from conspecifics modify the activity of female bank voles, Clethrionomys glareolus. Acta Theriol., 42: in press. Luke, M.C. and Coffey, D.S., 1994. The male sex accessory tissues. Structure, androgen action and physiology. In: E. Knobil and J.D. Neill (Editors), The Physiology of Reproduction, 2nd Edn., Raven Press, New York, pp. 1435–1487. Marchlewska-Koj, A., Kolodziej, B. and Filimowska, O., 1989. Aggressive behavior of adult bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) towards conspecifics. Aggress. Behav., 15: 381–387. Mossman, C.A. and Drickamer, L.C. 1996. Odor preferences of female house mice (Mus domesticus) in seminatural enclosures. J. Comp. Psychol., 110: 131–138. Parmigiani, S., Brunoni, V. and Pasquali, A., 1982. Socio-sexual preferences of female mice (Mus musculus domesticus): the influence of social aggressive capacities of isolated or grouped males. Boll. Zool., 49: 73–78. Rozenfeld, F.M. and Rasmont R., 1991. Odour cue recognition by dominant male bank voles, Clethrionomys glareolus. Anim. Behav., 41: 839–850. Rowsemitt, C.N., Welsh, C.J., Kuehl, M.C., Moore, R.E. and Jackson, L.L., 1988. Hormonal regulation of preputial gland function in male Microtus montanus, the montane vole. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 96: 195–200. Shapiro, L.E., Austin, D. Ward, S.D. and Dewsbury D.A. 1986. Familiarity and female mate choice in two species of voles (Microtus achrogaster and Microtus montanus). Anim. Behav., 34: 90–97. Sokal, R. and Rohlf, F., 1981. Biometry: the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. Freeman, San Francisco, pp. 226–229 and 448–449.