Development of the severity of violence against women scales
Tóm tắt
In response to the need for more sensitive assessment instruments, scales were developed applicable to the evaluation of male violence against women. Two versions of the Severity of Violence Against Women Scale (SVAWS) were developed. On 10-point scales, college females (N = 707) rated how serious, aggressive, abusive, violent, and threatening it would be if a man carried out each of 46 acts with a woman. The mean of each act across ratings was calculated and submitted to factor analysis. Nine factors represented symbolic violence: threats of mild, moderate, and serious violence; actual mild, minor, moderate, and serious violence; and sexual violence. Community women (N = 208) rated the acts on seriousness, aggressiveness, and abusiveness. All factors were unidimensional. Second-order factor analysis confirmed the existence of two broader dimensions representing physically threatening acts and actual violence. Ratings of the amount of physical and emotional harm provided the weightings for future research with student (SVAWS-S) and adult (SVAWS) samples.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Arias, L, and Johnson, P. J. (1986).Evaluations of Physical Aggression in Marriage, Paper presented at the 20th Annual Convention of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Chicago, IL.
Arias, I., and Johnson, P. J. (1989). Evaluations of physical aggression among intimate dyads.J. Interpers. Viol. 4: 298–307.
Barling, J., O'Leary, K. D., Jouriles, E. N., Vivian, P., and MacEwen, K. E. (1987). Factor similarity of the conflict tactics scales across samples, spouses, and sites: Issues and implications.J. Fam. Viol. 2: 37–54.
Finkelhor, P., Hotaling, G. T., and Yllo, K. (1988).Stopping Family Violence, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Gondolf, E. W. (1987). Evaluating programs for men who batter: Problems and prospects.J. Fam. Viol. 2: 95–108.
Hamberger, L. K., and Hastings, J. E. (1988). Skills training for treatment of spouse abusers: An outcome study.J Fam. Viol. 3: 121–130.
Hudson, W. W., and McIntosh, S. R. (1981). The assessment of spouse abuse: Two quantifiable dimensions.J. Marr. Fam. 43: 873–885.
Koski, P. R., and Mangold, W. D. (1988). Gender effects in attitudes about family violence.J. Fam. Viol. 3: 225–237.
Makepeace, J. M. (1986). Gender differences in courtship violence victimization.Fam. Relat. 35: 383–388.
Marshall, L. L. (in press). The severity of violence against men scales.J. Fam. Viol.
Pirog-Good, M. A., and Stets, J. E. (1989). The help-seeking behavior of physically and sexually abused college students. In Pirog-Good, M. A., and Stets, J. E. (eds.),Violence in Dating Relationships: Emerging Social Issues, Praeger, New York.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales.J. Marr. Fam. 41: 75–86.
Straus, M. C., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. K. (1980).Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family, Anchor Press/Doubleday, Garden City, NY.
Sugarman, D. B., and Hotaling, G. T. (1989). Dating violence: prevalence, context, and risk markers. In Pirog-Good, M. A., and Stets, J. E. (eds.),Violence in Dating Relationship: Emerging Social Issues, Praeger, New York.
Tolman, R. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners.Viol. Vict. 4: 159–177.
Weis, J. G. (1989). Family violence research methodology and design. In Ohlin, L., and Tonry, M. (eds.),Family Violence, University of Chicago Press.
Windle, M. (1988). Psychometric strategies of measures of temperament: A methodological critique.Int. J. Behav. Devel. 11: 171–201.
Yllo, K. (1989). Political and methodological debates in wife abuse research. In Yllo, K., and Bograd, M. (eds.),Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.