Burrow characteristics of the co-existing sibling species Mus booduga and Mus terricolor and the genetic basis of adaptation to hypoxic/hypercapnic stress

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 9 - Trang 1-7 - 2009
Sunita Singh1,2, Nge Cheong3, Gopeshwar Narayan4, T Sharma2
1Department of Zoology, Mahila Mahavidyalaya, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
2Cytogenetics Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
3Bioprocessing Technology Centre, Clinical Research Centre, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
4Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India

Tóm tắt

The co-existing, sibling species Mus booduga and Mus terricolor show a difference in site-preference for burrows. The former build them in flat portion of the fields while the latter make burrows in earthen mounds raised for holding water in cultivated fields. In northern India which experiences great variation in climatic condition between summer and winter, M. booduga burrows have an average depth of 41 cm, as against 30 cm in southern India with less climatic fluctuation. M. terricolor burrows are about 20 cm deep everywhere. The three chromosomal species M. terricolor I, II and III have identical burrows, including location of the nest which is situated at the highest position. In contrast, in M. booduga burrows, the nest is at the lowest position. The nest chamber of M. booduga is located at greater depth than the nest chamber of M. terricolor. Also, in the burrows of M. booduga the exchange of air takes place only from one side (top surface) in contrast to the burrows of M. terricolor where air exchange is through three sides. Hence, M. booduga lives in relatively more hypoxic and hypercapnic conditions than M. terricolor. We observed the fixation of alternative alleles in M. booduga and M. terricolor at Superoxide dismutase-1 (Sod-1), Transferrin (Trf) and Hemoglobin beta chain (Hbb) loci. All the three are directly or indirectly dependent on oxygen concentration for function. In addition to these, there are differences in burrow patterns and site-preference for burrows suggesting difference in probable adaptive strategy in these co-existing sibling species. The burrow structure and depth of nest of the chromosomal species M. terricolor I, II and III are same everywhere probably due to the recency of their evolutionary divergence. Moreover, there is lack of competition for the well-adapted 'microhabitats' since they are non-overlapping in distribution. However, the co-existing sibling species M. booduga and M. terricolor exhibit mutual "exclusion" of the 'microhabitats' for burrow construction. Thus, location, structure and depth of the burrows might have been the contributory factors for selection of alternative alleles at three loci Sod-1, Trf and Hbb, which reflect difference in probable adaptive strategy in M. booduga and M. terricolor.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Matthey R, Petter F: Existence de deux especes I'une chromosomiquement polmorphe, chez des Mus Indiens du groupe booduga. Etude cytogenetique et taxonomique. Rev Suisse de Zool. 1968, 75: 461-498. Sen S, Sharma T: Role of constitutive heterochromatin in evolutionary divergence: Results of chromosome banding and condensation inhibition studies in Mus musculus, Mus boobuga and Mus dunni. Evolution. 1983, 37: 628-636. 10.2307/2408275. Sharma T, Cheong N, Sen P, Sen S: Constitutive heterochromatin and evolutionary divergence of Mus dunni, Mus booduga, and Mus musculus. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1986, 127: 35-44. Chatterjee B, Bahadur M, Sharma T: Mitochondrial DNA restriction maps of Mus booduga, Mus terricolor and Mus musculus tytleri. J Genet. 1994, 73: 57-64. 10.1007/BF02927942. Sharma T: Chromosomal and molecular divergence in the Indian pygmy field mice M. booduga-terricolor lineage of the subgenus Mus. Genetica. 1996, 97: 331-338. 10.1007/BF00055319. Singh S, Sharma T: High levels of genetic variations in Indian field and house mice. J Genet. 1997, 76: 189-200. 10.1007/BF02932217. Sharma GG, Sharma T: Unusual chromosomal organization of telomeric sequences and expeditious karyotipic differentiation in the recently evolved Mus terricolor complex. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1998, 80: 204-208. 10.1159/000014981. Estep DQ, Lanier DL, Dewsbury DA: Copulatory behaviour and nest building behaviour of wild house mice (Mus musculus). Anim Learn Behav. 1975, 3: 329-336. Wolfe JL, Barnett SA: Effects of cold on nest-building by wild and domestic mice, Mus musculus L. Biol J Linn Soc. 1977, 9: 73-85. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1977.tb00260.x. McNab B: The metabolism of fossorial rodents: a study of convergency. Ecology. 1966, 47: 712-733. 10.2307/1934259. Arieli R, Nevo E: Hypoxic survival differs between two mole rat species (Spalax ehrenbergi) of humid and arid habitats. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1991, A100: 543-545. 10.1016/0300-9629(91)90367-L. Nevo E, Ivanitskaya E, Beiles A: Adaptive radiation of Blind Subterranean Mole rat. Backhuys, Leiden. 2001 Shams I, Avivi A, Nevo E: Hypoxic stress tolerance of the Blind Subterranean Mole rat: Expression of erythropoietin and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA. 2004, 101: 9698-9703. 10.1073/pnas.0403540101. Shams I, Nevo E, Avivi A: Erythropoietin receptor spliced forms differentially expressed in blind subterranean mole rats. FASEB J. 2005, 19: 307-309. Russel EW: Soil conditions and plant growth. 1961, English Language Book Society Baver L, Gardner W, Gardner W: Soil Physics. 1972, Wiley, New York Maclean G: Factors influencing the composition of respiratory gases in mammal burrows. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1981, A84: 517-522. McNab B: The physiological ecology of vertebrates-A view from energetic. 2002, Cornell University Press, New York Weber RE, Fago A: Functional adaptation and its molecular basis in vertebrate hemoglobins, neuroglobins and cytoglobins. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2004, 144: 141-159. 10.1016/j.resp.2004.04.018. Storz JF: Hemoglobin function and physiological adaptation to hypoxia in High-Altitude mammals. J Mammal. 2007, 88: 24-31. 10.1644/06-MAMM-S-199R1.1. Peters ML, Andrews SJ, Loutit JB: A mouse beta-globin mutant that is exact model of hemoglobin rainer in man. Genetics. 1985, 110: 709-721. Giblett ER, Hickman CG, Smithies O: Serum transferrin. Nature. 1959, 183: 1589-1590. 10.1038/1831589a0. Peng TX, Moya A, Ayala FJ: Irradiation-resistance conferred by superoxide dismutase: Possible adaptive role of a natural polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA. 1986, 83: 684-687. 10.1073/pnas.83.3.684. Anitei S: How to resist the lack of oxygen? The blind mole rat gives the answer. [http://news.softpedia.com/news/How-to-Resist-the-Lack-of-Oxygen-45014.shtml] Selander RK, Smith MG, Yang SY, Johnson WE, Gentry JB: Biochemical polymorphism and systematic in the genus Peromyscus. I. Variation in the old field mouse (Peromyscus polionotus). Studies Genet. 1971, 7103: 49-90. Harris H, Hopkinson DA: Handbook of enzyme electrophoresis in human genetics. 1976, North Holland: Amsterdam Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AI, Randall RJ: Protein measurement with the Folin Phenol Reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951, 193: 265-275. Morton JR: The multiple electrophoretic bands of mouse hemoglobins. Genet Res, Cambridge. 1966, 7: 76-85. Cohen BL: Genetics of plasma transferrins in the mouse. Genet Res, Cambridge. 1960, 1: 431-438.