From Interactional Justice to Citizenship Behaviors: Role Enlargement or Role Discretion?
Tóm tắt
An organizational field study examined the mechanisms through which supervisors’ interactional justice influences employees’ individual-directed organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs). Although, previous research supports the relationship between interactional fairness and OCBs, the mechanisms of operation remain unclear. Separate frameworks, based on role enlargement and role discretion exist, with no prior attempts to compare them. In this study, I examine two competitive models, (a) a role enlargement model, using employees’ role definitions as a mediator and (b) a role discretion model, using employees’ role definitions as a moderator. The results, based on data collected from 141 employee-manager dyads in a work organization, confirm that role definitions moderate the relationships between interactional justice and OCBs. The findings are discussed to derive theoretical and practical implications and directions for future research.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aiken L. S., West S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Ambrose M. L., Schminke C. F. (2003). Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, interactional justice, perceived organizational support, and supervisory trust. J. Appl. Psychol., 88: 295–305
Aryee S., Budhwar P. S., Chen Z. X. (2002). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. J. Organ. Behav., 23:267–285
Barling J., Phillips M. (1993). Interactional, formal, and distributive justice in the workplace: An exploratory study. J. Psychol., 127:649–656
Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 51:1173–1182
Bateman T. S., Organ D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship”. Acad. Manag. J., 26:587–595
Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In Cummings, L. L. and Staw, B. M. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 9, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 289–319
Bies R. J. (2001). Interactional (in)justice: The sacred and the profane. In: Greenberg J., Cropanzano R. (Eds.), Advances in Organizational Justice. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 89–118
Bies, R. J.,and Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In Lewicki, R. J., Sheppard, B. H. and Bazerman, M. H. (eds.), Research on Negotiations in Organizations, Vol. 1, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 43–55
Bies R. J., Shapiro D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. Soc. Justice Res., 1:199–218
Blader S. L., Tyler T. R (2003). What constitutes fairness in work settings? A four-component model of procedural justice. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev., 13:107–126
Blau P. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. Wiley, New York, NY
Brehm J. W. (1966). A theory of Psychological Reactance. Academic Press, New York
Brehm J. W., Sensenig J. (1966). Social influence as a function of attempted and implied usurpation of choice. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 4:703–707
Brockner J., De Cremer D., van den Bos K., Chen Y. (2005). The influence of interdependent self-construals on procedural fairness effects. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 96:155–167
Chaplin W. F. (1991). The next generation of moderator research in personality psychology. J. Pers., 59:143–178
Champoux J., Peters W. (1987). Form, effect size, and power in moderated regression analysis. J. Occup. Psychol., 60:243–255
Cohen J., Cohen P., West S. G., Aiken L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
Cohen-Charash Y., Spector P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 86:278–321
Colquitt J.A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. J. Appl. Psychol., 86:386–400
Colquitt J. A., Conlon D. E., Wesson M. J., Porter C. O. L. H., Yee Ng K. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J. Appl. Psychol., 86:425–45
Colquitt J. A., Shaw J. C. (2005). How should organizational justice be measured?. In: Greenberg J., Colquitt J. A. (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Justice, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 113–152
Coyle-Shapiro J. A.-M., Kessler I., Purcell J. (2004). Exploring organizationally-directed citizenship behaviour: Reciprocity or ‘It’s my job’? J. Manag. Studies, 41:85–106
Cropanzano R., Byrne Z. S. (2000). Workplace justice and the dilemma of organizational citizenship. In M. Van Vugt, M. Snyder, T. A. Tyler, A. Biel (Eds), Cooperation in Modern Society: Promoting the Welfare of Communities and Organizations (pp. 142–161). Routledge, London
Cropanzano R., Byrne Z. S., Bobocel R. D., Rupp D. E. (2001). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. J. Vocat. Behav., 58:164–209
Cropanzano R., Prehar C. A., Chen P. Y. (2002). Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group Organ. Manag., 27:324–351
Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D. E., Mohler, C. J., Schminke, M. (2001). Three roads to organizational justice. In Ferris J. (ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 20, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 1–113
Deckop J. R., Mangel R., Cirka C. C. (1999). Getting more than you pay for: Organizational citizenship behavior and pay-for-performance plans. Acad. Manag. J., 42:420–428
Deckop J. R., Merriman K. K., Blau G. (2004). Impact of variable risk preferences on the effectiveness of control by pay. J. Occup. Organ.Psychol., 77:63–80
De Cremer D., Van Knippenberg D., Van Dijke M., Bos A. E. R. (2004). How self-relevant is fair treatment? Social self-esteem moderates interactional justice effects, Soc. Justice Res., 17:407–419
De Cremer D. (2005). Procedural and distributive justice effects moderated by organizational identification. J. Manag. Psychol., 20:4–13
Farh J., Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. W. (1990). Accounting for organizational citizenship behavior: Leader fairness and task scope versus satisfaction. J. Manag., 16:705–722
Folger R., Bies R. J. (1989). Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice. Employee Responsibil. Rights J., 2:79–90
Gellatly I. R. (1995). Individual and group determinants of employee absenteeism: Test of a causal model. J. Organ. Behav., 16:469–485
Greenberg J. (1994). Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban. J. Appl. Psychol., 79:288–297
Hofmann D. A., Morgeson F. P., Gerras S. J. (2003). Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content-specific citizenship: Safety climate as exemplar. J. Appl. Psychol., 88:170–178
Homans G. C. (1961). Social Behavior. Its Elementary Forms. Hartcourt Brace & World, New York
Ilgen D. R., Hollenbeck J. R. (1991). The structure of work: Job design and roles. In M. D. Dunette, L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2nd Ed.). Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 165–208
Konovsky M. A., Cropanzano R. (1991). Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. J. Appl. Psychol., 76:698–707
Korsgaard M. A., Schweiger D. M., Sapienza H. J. (1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Acad. Manag. J., 38:60–84
Lam S. S. K., Hui C., Law K. S. (1999). Organizational citizenship behavior: Comparing perspectives of supervisors and subordinates across four international samples. J. Appl. Psychol., 84:594–601
Leventhal G. S. (1980), What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In: K. S. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 27–55
Masterson S. S., Lewis K., Goldman B. M., Taylor M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair work procedures and treatment on work relationships. Acad. Manag. J., 43:738–748
Mikula G., Petri B., Tanzer N. K. (1990). What people regard as unjust: Types and structures of everyday experiences of injustice. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol., 20:133–149
Moorman R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? J. Appl. Psychol., 76:845–855
Moorman R. H., Blakely G. L., Niehoff B. P. (1998). Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior? Acad. Manag. J., 41:351–357
Moorman R. H., Blakely G. L. (1995). Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. J. Organ. Behav., 16:127–142
Moorman R. J., Niehoff B. P., Organ D. W. (1993). Treating employees fairly and organizational citizenship behaviors: Sorting the effects of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and procedural justice. Employee Responsibil. Rights J., 6:209–225
Morrison E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee’s perspective. Acad. Manag. J., 37:1543–1567
Neale A., Griffin M. A. (2006). A model of self-held work roles and role transitions. Hum. Perform., 19:23–41
Nowakowski J. M., Conlon D. E. (2005). Organizational justice: Looking back, looking forward. Int. J. Conflict. Manag., 16:4–29
Organ D. W. (1977). A reappraisal and reinterpretation of the satisfaction-causes-performance hypothesis. Acad. Manag. Rev., 2:46–53
Organ D. W. (1988). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA
Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis for organizational citizenship behavior. In Staw, B. M. Cummings L. L. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12, JAI Press, Greenwich, pp. 43–72
Organ D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Hum. Perform., 10:85–97
Organ D. W., Konovsky M. A. (1989). Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. J. Appl. Psychol., 74:157–164
Organ D. W., Moorman R. H. (1993). Fairness and organizational citizenship behavior: What are the connections? Soc. Justice Res., 6:5–18
Pillai R., Schriesheim C. A., Williams (1999). Fairness perceptions and trust as mediators for transformational and transactional leadership: A two-sample study. J. Manag., 25:897–933
Podsakoff P. M., Aheane M., MacKenzie S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. J. Appl. Pychol., 82:262–270
Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior and sales unit effectiveness. J. Market. Res., 31:351–363
Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B. (1997). The impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestions for future research. Hum. Perform., 10:133–151
Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Bommer W. H. (1996). Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors. J. Manag., 22:259–298
Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S., Moorman R. H., Fetter R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quart., 1:107–142
Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Paine J. B., Bacharach D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. J. Manag., 26:513–563
Pond S. B., Nacoste R. W., Mohr M. F., Rodriguez C. M. (1997). The measurement of organizational citizenship behavior: Are we assuming too much? J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 27:1527–1544
Rioux S. M., Penner L. A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis. J. Appl. Psychol., 86:1306–1314
Rupp D. E., Cropanzano R. (2002). The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 89:925–946
Schminke M., Ambrose M. L., Cropanzano R. S. (2000). The effect of organizational structure on perceptions of procedural fairness. J. Appl. Psychol., 85:294–304
Shapiro D. L., Buttner E. H., Barry B. (1994). Explanations: What factors enhance their perceived adequacy? Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes., 58:346–368
Smith C. A., Organ D. W., Near J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. J. Appl. Psychol., 74:385–393
Skarlicki D. P., Latham G. P. (1996). Increasing citizenship within a union: A test of organizational justice theory. J. Appl. Psychol., 68:653–663
Skarlicki D. P., Latham G. P. (1997). Leadership training in organizational justice to increase citizenship behavior within a labor union: A replication. Pers. Psychol., 50:617–633
Taylor M. S., Tracy K. B., Renard M. K., Harrison J. K., Carroll S. J. (1995). Due process in performance appraisal: A quasi-experiment in procedural justice. Admin. Sci. Quart., 40:495–523
Tepper B. J., Lockhart D., Hoobler J. (2001). Justice, citizenship and role definition effects. J. Appl. Psychol., 86:789–896
Tepper B. J., Taylor E. C. (2003). Relationships among supervisors’ and subordinates’ procedural justice perceptions and organizational citizenship behaviors. Acad. Manag. J., 46:97–105
Thibaut J. T., Kelley H. H. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: Wiley
Tyler T. R., Bies R. J. (1990). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In J. S. Carroll (Ed.), Applied Social Psychology in Business Settings. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 77–98
Tyler, T. R., Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 115–191
Van Dyne, L., Ellis, B. J. (2004). Job creep: A reactance theory perspective on organizational citizenship behavior as overfulfillment of obligations. In Coyle-Shapiro, J., Shore, L., Taylor, M. S., and Tetrick, L., (eds.), The Employment Relationship: Examining Psychological and Contextual Perspectives, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 181–205
Van Dyne L., Graham J. W., Dienesch R. M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Acad. Manag. J. , 37:765–802
Vey M. A., Campbell J. P. (2004). In-role or extra-role organizational citizenship behavior: Which are we measuring? Hum. Perform., 17:119–135
Wayne S. J., Shore L. M., Liden R. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Acad. Manag. J., 40:82–111
Wayne S. J., Shore L. M., Bommer W. H., Tetrick L. E. (2002). The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader-member exchange. J. Appl. Psychol., 87:590–598
Williams L. J., Anderson S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. J. Manag., 17:601–617
Zellars K. L., Tepper B. J., Duffy M. K. (2002). Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior. J. Appl. Psychol., 87:1068–1076