Large-scale allosteric conformational transitions of adenylate kinase appear to involve a population-shift mechanism

Karunesh Arora1, Charles L. Brooks1
1Department of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037

Tóm tắt

Large-scale conformational changes in proteins are often associated with the binding of a substrate. Because conformational changes may be related to the function of an enzyme, understanding the kinetics and energetics of these motions is very important. We have delineated the atomically detailed conformational transition pathway of the phosphotransferase enzyme adenylate kinase (AdK) in the absence and presence of an inhibitor. The computed free energy profiles associated with conformational transitions offer detailed mechanistic insights into, as well as kinetic information on, the ligand binding mechanism. Specifically, potential of mean force calculations reveal that in the ligand-free state, there is no significant barrier separating the open and closed conformations of AdK. The enzyme samples near closed conformations, even in the absence of its substrate. The ligand binding event occurs late, toward the closed state, and transforms the free energy landscape. In the ligand-bound state, the closed conformation is energetically most favored with a large barrier to opening. These results emphasize the underlying dynamic nature of the enzyme and indicate that the conformational transitions in AdK are more intricate than a mere two-state jump between the crystal-bound and -unbound states. Based on the existence of the multiple conformations of the enzyme in the open and closed states, a different viewpoint of ligand binding is presented. Our estimated activation energy barrier for the conformational transition is also in reasonable accord with the experimental findings.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1073/pnas.44.2.98

10.1021/bi00865a047

10.1126/science.291.5512.2429

10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00181-2

10.1016/0022-2836(92)90582-5

10.1002/prot.340150106

10.1021/bi00501a013

10.1021/bi00142a022

10.1021/bi952687j

10.1021/bi992076h

10.1038/nsmb821

10.1021/jp060282a

10.1021/jp061976m

10.1021/jp064303c

10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00135-3

10.1073/pnas.2135471100

10.1002/prot.20226

10.1021/jp046736q

10.1016/j.jmb.2005.07.031

10.1016/j.jmb.2006.11.085

10.1007/978-0-387-22464-0

10.1021/ar0100172

10.1038/nsb0902-646

10.1073/pnas.0408930102

10.1021/jp0446377

10.1063/1.2363379

10.1146/annurev.biophys.35.040405.102010

10.1142/9789812839664_0016

10.1063/1.1627754

10.1016/0021-9991(77)90121-8

10.1021/ja050482k

10.1016/j.str.2005.09.005

10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030023

10.1146/annurev.physchem.53.082301.113146

10.1016/j.jmb.2006.01.054

10.1016/0304-4173(85)90014-X

10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00633.x

10.1074/jbc.274.32.22238

10.1021/bi00449a011

10.1038/83028

10.1002/jcc.540040211

10.1021/jp973084f

10.1021/ja036959e

JP Ryckaert, G Ciccotti, HJC Berendsen J Comput Chem 23, 327–341 (1977).

10.1063/1.1480013

10.1002/jcc.10272

10.1002/jcc.540130812