Prospect theory in multiple price list experiments: further insights on behaviour in the loss domain
Tóm tắt
In the theoretical description of prospect theory, distinct sets of parameters can control the curvature of the value function and the shape of the probability weighting function. There is one for the gain domain and one for the loss domain. However, in most estimations, behaviour over losses is assumed to perfectly reflect behaviour over gains, through a unique set of parameters. We examine the consequences of relaxing this simplifying assumption in the context of Tanaka et al.’s (Am Econ Rev 100(1):557–571, 2010) risk-elicitation procedure based on multiple price lists. We show that subjects’ behaviour for gains is mostly reflected for losses at the aggregate and individual levels, and is consistent with the distinctive prospect theory fourfold pattern. Reflection is only partial as the mean curvature of the value function is slightly less convex for losses than it is concave for gains. These results are robust to a high-stake context. However, we demonstrate that assuming reflection can have huge consequences on loss-aversion measures. Incidentally, we also highlight the existence of a strong, negative and persistent pure loss-frame effect on elicited loss aversion. We recommend that future practitioners and modellers are particularly cautious about the loss-aversion values they obtain or use because these are especially sensitive to parametric assumptions and framing.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abdellaoui, M. (2000). Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Science, 46(11), 1497–1512.
Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H., & L’Haridon, O. (2008). A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 36(3), 245–266.
Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H., L’Haridon, O., & van Dolder, D. (2016). Measuring loss aversion under ambiguity: A method to make prospect theory completely observable. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 52, 1–20.
Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H., & Paraschiv, C. (2007). Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement. Management Science, 53(10), 1659–1674.
Andersen, S., Harrison, G. W., & Rutström, E. E. (2006). Choice behavior, asset integration and natural reference points. Working Paper 06-07, Department of Economics, College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida.
Attema, A. E., Brouwer, W. B. F., & l’Haridon, O. (2013). Prospect theory in the health domain: A quantitative assessment. Journal of Health Economics,32(6), 1057–1065.
Attema, A. E., Brouwer, W. B. F., l’Haridon, O., & Pinto, J. L. (2016). An elicitation of utility for quality of life under prospect theory. Journal of Health Economics,48, 121–134.
Attema, A. E. (2012). Developments in time preference and their implications for medical decision making. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 63, 1388–1399.
Babcock, B. A. (2015). Using cumulative prospect theory to explain anomalous crop insurance coverage choice. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 97(5), 1371–1384.
Barberis, N. C. (2013). Thirty years of prospect theory in economics: A review and assessment. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(1), 173–196.
Barberis, N., Huang, M., & Santos, T. (2001). Prospect theory and asset prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 1–53.
Bauermeister, G.-F., Hermann, D., & Musshoff, O. (2018). Consistency of determined risk attitudes and probability weightings across different elicitation methods. Theory and Decision, 84, 627–644.
Bleichrodt, H., & Pinto, J. L. (2002). Loss aversion and scale compatibility in two-attribute trade-offs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46(3), 315–337.
Bocquého, G., Deschamps, M., Helstroffer, J., Jacob, J., & Joxhe, M. (2018). Risk and refugee migration. Sciences Po OFCE Working Paper, no. 10, 2018-03-12.
Bocquého, G., Jacquet, F., & Reynaud, A. (2014). Expected utility or prospect theory maximisers? Assessing farmers’ risk behaviour from field-experiment data. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 41(1), 135–172.
Booij, A. S., & van de Kuilen, G. (2009). A parameter-free analysis of the utility of money for the general population under prospect theory. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(4), 651–666.
Booij, A., van Praag, B., & van de Kuilen, G. (2010). A parametric analysis of prospect theory’s functionals for the general population. Theory and Decision, 68, 115–148.
Bosch-Domènech, A., & Silvestre, J. (2006). Reflections on gains and losses: A 2 \(\times\) 2 \(\times\) 7 experiment. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 33, 217–235.
Bosch-Domènech, A., & Silvestre, J. (2013). Measuring risk aversion with lists: A new bias. Theory and Decision, 75, 465–496.
Bouchouicha, R., & Vieider, F. M. (2017). Accommodating stake effects under prospect theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 55, 1–28.
Bougherara, D., Gassmann, X., Piet, L., & Reynaud, A. (2017). Structural estimation of farmers’ risk and ambiguity preferences: A field experiment. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 44(5), 782–808.
Campos-Vazquez, R. M., & Cuilty, E. (2014). The role of emotions on risk aversion: A prospect theory experiment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 50, 1–9.
Cohen, M., Jaffray, J.-Y., & Said, T. (1987). Experimental comparison of individual behavior under risk and under uncertainty for gains and for losses. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39(1), 1–22.
Csermely, T., & Rabas, A. (2016). How to reveal people’s preferences: Comparing time consistency and predictive power of multiple price list risk elicitation methods. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 53, 107–136.
Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (2008). Forecasting risk attitudes: An experimental study using actual and forecast gamble choices. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68(1), 1–7.
Etchart-Vincent, N. (2004). Is probability weighting sensitive to the magnitude of consequences? An experimental investigation on losses. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 28(3), 217–235.
Fehr-Duda, H., Bruhin, A., Epper, T., & Schubert, R. (2010). Rationality on the rise: Why relative risk aversion increases with stake size. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 40, 147–180.
Fehr-Duda, H., de Gennaro, M., & Schubert, R. (2006). Gender, financial risk, and probability weights. Theory and Decision, 60, 283–313.
Fennema, H., & van Assen, M. (1998). Measuring the utility of losses by means of the tradeoff method. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 17, 277–296.
Grinblatt, M., & Han, B. (2005). Prospect theory, mental accounting, and momentum. Journal of Financial Economics, 78(2), 311–339.
Harbaugh, W. T., Krause, K., & Vesterlund, L. (2010). The fourfold pattern of risk attitudes in choice and pricing tasks. The Economic Journal, 120(545), 595–611.
Harrison, G. W., & Rutström, E. E. (2008). Risk aversion in the laboratory. In J. C. Cox & G. Harrison (Eds.), Risk aversion in experiments, research in experimental economics (Vol. 12, pp. 41–196). JAI Press.
Harrison, G. W., & Rutström, E. E. (2009). Expected utility theory and prospect theory: One wedding and a decent funeral. Experimental Economics, 12, 133–158.
Hershey, J. C., Kunreuther, H. C., & Schoemaker, P. J. (1982). Sources of bias in assessment procedures for utility functions. Management Science, 25(8), 936–953.
Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655.
Johnson, C., Baillon, A., Bleichrodt, H., Li, Z., Dolder, D. V., & Wakker, P. P. (2021). Prince: An improved method for measuring incentivized preferences. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 62(1), 1–28.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.
Köbberling, V., & Wakker, P. P. (2005). An index of loss aversion. Journal of Economic Theory, 122(1), 119–131.
Kühberger, A., Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M., & Perner, J. (1999). The effects of framing, reflection, probability, and payoff on risk preference in choice tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 204–231.
Lau, M., Yoo, H. I., & Zhao, H. (2019). The reflection effect and fourfold pattern of risk attitudes: A structural econometric analysis. Department of Economics, Copenhagen Business School, and Durham University Business School, Durham University.
Laury, S. K. & Holt, C. A. (2008). Further reflections on the reflection effect. In J. C. Cox, & G. Harrison (Eds.), Risk aversion in experiments, research in experimental economics (Vol. 12, pp. 405–440). JAI Press.
L’Haridon, O., & Vieider, F. M. (2019). All over the map: A worldwide comparison of risk preferences. Quantitative Economics, 10, 185–215.
Liebenhem, S., & Waibel, H. (2014). Simultaneous estimation of risk and time preferences among small-scale cattle farmers in West Africa. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 96(5), 1420–1438.
Liu, E. (2013). Time to change what to sow: Risk preferences and technology adoption decisions of cotton farmers in China. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(4), 1386–1403.
Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.
Mercer, J. (2005). Prospect theory and political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 8, 1–21.
Nguyen, Q. D., & Leung, P. (2009). Do fishermen have different attitudes toward risk? An application of prospect theory to the study of Vietnamese fishermen. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 34(3), 518–538.
Prelec, D. (1998). The probability weighting function. Econometrica, 66(3), 497–528.
Reynaud, A., & Couture, S. (2012). Stability of risk preference measures: Results from a field experiment on French farmers. Theory and Decision, 73(2), 203–221.
Schmidt, U., & Traub, S. (2002). An experimental test of loss aversion. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 25(3), 233–249.
Scholten, M., & Read, D. (2014). Prospect theory and the “forgotten’’ fourfold pattern of risk preferences. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 48(1), 67–83.
Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1968). The relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk taking. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 1–18.
Tanaka, T., Camerer, C. F., & Nguyen, Q. (2010). Risk and time preferences: Linking experimental and household survey data from Vietnam. American Economic Review, 100(1), 557–571.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.
Wakker, P. P. (2010). Prospect theory: For risk and ambiguity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wakker, P., & Deneffe, D. (1996). Eliciting von Neumann–Morgenstern utilities when probabilities are distorted or unknown. Management Science, 42(8), 1131–1150.
Wakker, P. P., Köbberling, V., & Schwieren, C. (2007). Prospect-theory’s diminishing sensitivity versus economic intrinsic utility of money: How the introduction of the Euro can be used to disentangle the two empirically. Theory and Decision, 63, 205–231.
Wehrung, D. A. (1989). Risk taking over gains and losses: A study of oil executives. Annals of Operations Research, 19, 115–139.
Zhao, S., & Yue, C. (2020). Risk preferences of commodity crop producers and specialty crop producers: An application of prospect theory. Agricultural Economics, 51, 359–372.