An assessment of image reject rates for digital radiography in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study

JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH AND APPLIED SCIENCES - Tập 15 - Trang 219-223 - 2022
Yazeed Alashban1, Nasser Shubayr2,3, Abdulrahman A. Alghamdi4, Sami A. Alghamdi1, Sami Boughattas4
1Department of Radiological Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2Department of Diagnostic Radiology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
3Medical Research Center, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
4Radiology Department, Aseer Central Hospital, Aseer, Saudi Arabia

Tài liệu tham khảo

Atkinson, 2020, Reject rate analysis in digital radiography: An Australian emergency imaging department case study, Journal of Medical and Radiation Sciences, 67, 72, 10.1002/jmrs.343 Barry, 2016, A clinical audit of anatomical side marker use in a paediatric medical imaging de- partment, Journal of Medical and Radiation Sciences, 63, 148, 10.1002/jmrs.176 Bushberg, 2002 Canon, 2010 Carmichael, 1996 Clark, 2003, Reject/repeat analysis and the effect prior film viewing has on a department's reject/repeat rate, Radiography, 9, 127, 10.1016/S1078-8174(03)00036-1 Dunn, 1998, X-ray film analysis as a quality indicator, Radiography, 4, 29, 10.1016/S1078-8174(98)80027-8 Foos, 2009, Digital radiography reject analysis: Data collection methodology, results, and recommendations from an in-depth investigation at two hospitals, Journal of Digital Imaging, 22, 89, 10.1007/s10278-008-9112-5 Hofmann, 2015, Image rejects in general direct digital radiography, Acta Radiol, 4, 1 Honea, 2002, Is reject analysis necessary after converting to computed radiography?, Journal of Digital Imaging, 15, 41, 10.1007/s10278-002-5028-7 1991, Vol. 60 Jones, 2011, One year's results from a server-based system for performing reject analysis and exposure analysis in computed radiography, Journal of Digital Imaging, 24, 243, 10.1007/s10278-009-9236-2 Lau, 2004, Reject analysis: A comparison of conventional film-screen radiography and computed radiography with PACS, Radiography, 10, 183, 10.1016/j.radi.2004.03.014 Lin, 2016, Guidelines for reducing image retakes of general digital radiography, Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 8, 1, 10.1177/1687814016644127 Linet, 2012, Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic procedures, CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 62, 75 McKinney, 1994, Repeat exposures: Our little secret, Radiologic Technology, 65, 319 Moores, 1984, Reject analysis: Its role in quality assurance, Radiography, 50, 189 Mount, 2016, Reject analysis: A comparison of radiographer and radiologist perceptions of image quality, Radiography, 22, 112, 10.1016/j.radi.2015.12.001 Munro, 2001, Image quality optimisation and control Nol, 2006, Digital repeat analysis; setup and operation, Journal of Digital Imaging, 19, 159, 10.1007/s10278-005-8733-1 Peer, 2001, Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 94, 69, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006482 Pitcher, 1992, Quality assurance and radiologic audit, Current Opinion in Radiology, 4, 9 Prieto, 2009, Image retake analysis in digital radiography using DICOM header information, Journal of Digital Imaging, 22, 393, 10.1007/s10278-008-9135-y Supe, 1992, Estimation and significance of patient doses from diagnostic X-ray practices in India, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 43, 209, 10.1093/rpd/43.1-4.209 Taylor, 2015, Radiography, 21, 236, 10.1016/j.radi.2014.12.003 Weatherburn, 1992, Comparison of image reject rates when using film, hard copy computed radiography and soft copy images on picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) workstations, British Journal of Radiology, 72, 653, 10.1259/bjr.72.859.10624322 Whaley, 2013, Investigation of the variability in the assessment of digital chest X-ray image quality, Journal of Digital Imaging, 26, 217, 10.1007/s10278-012-9515-1