Assessment of safety against derailment using simulations and vehicle acceptance tests: a worldwide comparison of state-of-the-art assessment methods
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Hertz H., 1881, Jor. Math. (Crelle's Jor.), 92
Klingel, Organ Fortscr. Eisenbahnwesens, 38, 113
Nadal M. J., 1896, Locomotives á Vapeur, 186
Carter, F. W. The electric locomotive. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Series A. Vol. 221, pp.221–252.
Rocard Y., 1935, Acutal. Sci. Ind., 234
Heumann, H. 1953.Grundzuege der Fruerung der Schienenfahrzeuge, 133Muenchen: Verlag R. Oldenbourg.
Kalker, J. J. 1967. “On the rolling contact of two elastic bodies in the presence of dry friction”. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University. Doctoral thesis
ORE Question D71. “Stresses in the rails, the ballast and the formation resulting from traffic loads, Interim report No. 1 stresses in rails”. Utrecht, The Netherlands: ORE, UIC. April 1965 (D71/PP1/E (44400))
Harrison, H. D. and Ahlbeck, D. L. Development and validation of wayside wheel/rail load measurement techniques. Proceedings of the International Conference on Wheel/Rail Load and Displacement Techniques. pp.19–20. January
Pocklington, A. R. and Allen, R. A. 1977. “Improved data from load measuring wheels”. Vol. 2, 37–43. IMechE, Railway Eng.
Higgins, R. L., Otter, D. E. and Martin, R. W. High accuracy load measuring wheelset. Proceedings of the International Wheelset Congress. September, Sydney, Australia. pp.181–188.
Wrang M., 2006, Int. Railway Gazette
Elkins, J. A. and Carter, A. Testing and analysis techniques for safety assessment of rail vehicles: The state-of-the-art. Proceedings, presented at 13th IAVSD Symposium on the Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and on Tracks. August, Chengdu, China.
2005, UIC CODE 518: Testing and Approval of Railway Vehicles from the Point of View of their Dynamic Behaviour – Safety – Track Fatigue – Running Behaviour, 3
EN14363:2005: Railway Applications – Testing for the Acceptance of Running Characteristics of Railway Vehicles – Testing of Running Behaviour and Stationary Tests, 2005. European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC), Brussels
UIC CODE 518: Testing and Approval of Railway Vehicles from the Point of View of their Dynamic Behaviour – Safety – Track fatigue – Running Behaviour, 5th ed., International Union of Railways (UIC), Paris, 2009
Railway vehicle dynamics and track interactions: Total regulatory acceptance for the interoperable network, Collaborative Project, Grant Agreement Nr 234079. 1 June 2009–31 May 2013. Project led by Union des Industries Ferroviaires Europeennes (UNIFE)
Tajaddini, A. and Marquis, B. 2009. Proposed modifications to FRA high-speed track safety standards, FRA Presentation to TRB. December7–82009, Washington, DC.
Technical Standard for Japanese Railway, Published by the Railway Bureau of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, last revised 15 December 2006. Available athttp://www.mlit.go.jp/english/2006/h_railway_bureau/Laws_concerning/14.pdf(27 December 2010)
Blader, F. B. “A review of literature and methodologies in the study of derailments caused by excessive forces at the wheel/rail interface”. Association of American Railroads. Research Report R-717, December 1990
Elkins, J. A. The acceptance criteria for track worthiness, Proceedings, Chapter XI Workshop. September, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
Wu H., 2006, Handbook of Railway Vehicle Dynamics
EN15686:2010: Railway applications – testing for the acceptance of running characteristics of railway vehicles with cant deficiency compensation system and/or vehicles intended to operate with higher cant deficiency than stated in EN14363:2005, Annex G. European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC), Brussels
ORE QUESTION B55: Prevention of derailment on track twists. Report No. 8 (final report), Conditions for negotiating track twists: Recommended values for track twist and cant; calculation and measurement of the relevant vehicle parameters; vehicle testing, 164 pp, UTRECHT, April 1983
Shust, W. C., Elkins, J., Kalay, S. and El-Sibaie, M. 1997. Wheel-climb derailment tests using AAR's track loading vehicle. December1997. Washington, DC: Association of American Railroads. Research Report R-910
Wu, H. and Elkins, J. July 1999. “Investigations of wheel flange climb derailment criteria”. July, Washington, DC: Association of American Railroads. Research Report R-931
Wu, H., Shu, X. and Wilson, N. 2005. “Flange climb derailment criteria and wheel/rail profile management and maintenance guidelines for transit operations”. Vol. 5, Washington, DC: Track-Related Research, Transit Cooperative Research Program, Transportation Research Board. TCRP Report 71
Weinstock, H. Wheel climb derailment criteria for evaluation of rail vehicle safety, 1984 ASME Winter Annual Meeting. November. Phoenix, AZ Paper No. 84-WA/RT-1
Matsudaira, T. 1963. “Dynamics of high speed rolling stock”. Japanese National Railways RTRI Quarterly Reports. Special Issue
Koci, H. H. and Swenson, C. A. February 1978. “Locomotive wheel-loading – a system approach”. February, LaGrange, IL: General Motors Electromotive Division.
Zarembski, A. M. February 1977. “Rail rollover – the state of the art”. February, AAR Report R-258
Pak, W. and Gonsalves, R. W. November 1982. “Effect of experimental rail profile grinding, flange lubrication, and wheel profile on the steering of behaviour of 100-to freight car trucks”. November, Canadian Pacific Ltd. Rep S742-82
Prud'homme A., 1967, La Resistance de la Voie aux Effots Transvesaux Exerces par le Material Roulant
Kish, A., Sammevedam, G. and Jeong, D. 1985. “Influence of vehicle induced loads on the lateral stability of CWR track”. DOT Report No. FRA/ORD-85-03
Li, D. and Shust, W. December 1997. “Investigation of lateral track strength and track panel shift using AAR's track loading vehicle”. December, AAR/TTCI Research Report R-917
Lovette, P. M. and Thivierge, J. January 1992. “Train make-up manual”. January, Pueblo, CO: Association of American Railroads, Research Report R-802.
Vershinskiy S.V. [Stability of railcars against buckling with longitudinal forces when braking the train], Proceedings of All-Union Scientific Research Institute of Railway Transport, 1970, No. 425, pp. 4–36(in Russian)
UIC 530 -2: Wagons – Running safety, International Union of Railways (UIC), Paris, 2006
ORE QUESTION C138: Permissible limit values for the Y and Q forces and derailment criteria, Report No. 3: Derailment tests with two-axled wagon at Derby, 94 pp., UTRECHT, October 1979
ORE QUESTION C138: Permissible limit values for the Y and Q forces and derailment criteria, Report No. 8: Statistical analysis of tests for the (Y/Q)aderailment criterion, 150 pp., UTRECHT, September 1984
UIC CODE 432: Wagons – Running Speeds – Technical Conditions to be Observed, 11th ed., International Union of Railways (UIC), Paris, 2006
ORE QUESTION C138: Permissible limit values for the Y and Q forces and derailment criteria, Report No. 9 (Final report): Verification of limit values, tests under operating conditions, comparison of limit values with the actual position, 287 pp., UTRECHT, September 1986
UIC B12/RP76: Study into the suitability of a Y/Q limit value of 0.8 for empty wagons, 62 pp., International Union of Railways (UIC), Paris, 2008
Kratochwille, R. and Kolbe, T. 2008. “Grundsatzuntersuchungen zum Grenzwert Y/Q an Güterwagen mit der Bauart Y25. 9”. Internationale Schienenfahrzeugtagung Dresden.
Hendrik Wahl, J. 13 November 2008. “Untersuchungen zum Entgleisungskoeffizienten”. 13 November, Minden: Diplomarbeit Institut für Schienenfahrzeuge an der RWTH Aachen in Zusammenarbeit mit DB Systemtechnik.
Railway Group Standard GM/RT2141, Issue 3. June 2009. “Resistance of railway vehicles to derailment and roll-over”. June, Rail Safety and Standards Board Limited.
Group Standard GM/TT0088, Issue 1. Permissible track forces for railway vehicles. October. British Railways Board.
2007, Recommendations for Vehicle Static testing
Clark, R. November 1985. “A procedure for predicting dynamic lateral track forces for traction and rolling stock”. November, BR Research Unpublished Memorandum TM VTI 023.
Kejian, W. CR high-speed railway technical standard system. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on High Speed Rail, Part I. December. Beijing
Mei, Z. Technical standard system of China Railway on high speed. Presented at the 1st UIC Workshop on Global Standards HS Rail. October. Paris
Ministry of Railways of the People's Republic of China. Code for design of high-speed railway (trial). Professional Standard of the People's Republic of China. December. TB10621-2009
Kang, X. Simulated calculation and test verification for dynamic performance of high speed train. Presented at the 3rd Sino-American Transportation Forum, Cambridge, MA, September.
Na, H.S. “Strategy of Trans-Korean railway transportation and development of international corridors”. Korea Railroad Research Institute. Available athttp://www.unescap.org/ttdw/common/TIS/CorridorStudy/EGM_files/ROK_1.pdf(20 February 2011)
Korea Law,http://www.law.go.kr/main.html
Technical Standard for Japanese Railway,Published by the Railway Bureau of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, last revised 15 December 2006 Available athttp://www.mlit.go.jp/english/2006/h_railway_bureau/Laws_concerning/14.pdf(27 December 2010)
K. Takemoto, International Department, East Japan Railway Company,Japanese Standards for High Speed Rail Systems,Presentation at the 1st Workshop on Global Standards for High Speed Rail Systems, UIC, International Union of Railways, 15 October 2010. Available athttp://www.uic.org/spip.php?article2631on 27 December 2010
T. Morimura, Central Japan Railway Company,Introduction of safe and efficient N700-I bullet system, and countermeasures against derailment during earthquake.Available athttp://www.japantransport.com/seminar/JRCentral0111.pdf(14 January 2011)
The derailment of a Shinkansen train during the Niigata Chuetsu earthquake. Available athttp://www.uic.org/apps/presentation/rtishida.pdf(12 February 2011)
Ohno, K. and East Japan Railway Company. “Research and development for eliminating wheelclimb derailment accidents”. Safety Research Laboratory, Research and Development Center of JR East Group. Technical Review-No.2, Available athttp://www.jreast.co.jp/e/development/tech/pdf_2/46-50.pdf(30 December 2010)
2010, Manual of Standards and Recommended Practices
2010, Manual of Standards and Recommended Practices
2010, Manual of Standards and Recommended Practices
2010, Manual of Standards and Recommended Practices
49 CFR 213.333, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 49, Part 213, Track Safety Standards, Subpart G, Train Operations at Track Classes 6 and Higher. Available athttp://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=f09164a19ca78bafbcaf4b04b8574672&rgn=div6&view=text&node=49:4.1.1.1.8.7&idno=49
Johnstone, B. and Manos, W. P. June 1980. “Performance guidelines for high performance/high-cube covered hopper car 100 tons or greater”. June, Train Dynamics Research Program, AAR Research Report R-423.
Irani, F. D., Wilson, N. G. and Urban, C. L. 1989. “Safety aspects of new and untried freight cars”. FRA Report (DOT/FRA/ORD-88/07), November
Shu, X., Wilson, N. G., Wu, H. and Tunna, J. July 2004. “Distance-based flange climb L/V criteria”. July, Pueblo, CO: Association of American Railroads, Transportation Technology Center, Inc. Technology Digest TD04-012
American Public Transit Authority Standards, 6 Vols, American Public Transit Association, Washington, DC, 2004
2007, Standard for Wheel Load Equalization for Passenger Railroad Rolling Stock
Elkins, J. A. Tolerance of rail vehicles to track irregularities. Proceedings, presented at Track Technology for Modern Railways Conference. June. Hong Kong
Fraser, G. R. and Marianeschi, M. Integrating new LRV technology into mature infrastructure. Presented at APTA Light Rail Transit Conference. Portland Oregon November
Vehicle Track Interaction, Notice of Proposed Rule Making in the Federal Register, Monday, May 10, 2010, 49 CFR Parts 213 and 238 Vehicle/Track Interaction Safety Standards; High-Speed and High-Cant Deficiency Operations: Proposed Rule. Available athttp://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2010/05/10/2010-10624/vehicletrack-interaction-safety-standards-high-speed-and-high-cant-deficiency-operations
[Norms for calculation and design of cars for MPS railways of 1520 mm gauge (not self-propelled)], GosNIIV–VNIIZhT, Moscow, 1996, 319 pp
[Freight and passenger railcars. Methods of testing for structural strength and ride quality], RD 24.050.37.95, GosNIIV, Moscow, 1995, 101 pp
/Solid-rolled wheels. Design and dimensions. GOST 9036–88
[E.M. Bromberg, M.F. Verigo, V.N. Danilov and M.A. Frishman,Interaction between track and rolling stock] Transzheldorizdat, Moscow, 1956, 280 pp. (in Russian)
L.D. Kuzmich (ed.),[Increasing structural strength and reliability of railcar structures], VNIIV, Moscow, No. 50, 1984, 117 pp. (in Russian)
Boronenko, Yu., Orlova, A. and Rudakova, E. Special features in dynamic behaviour of articulated container flat wagon supporting middle container on both frames, 21st International Symposium of Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks IAVSD’09. Proceedings CD-ROM/P174. pp.8Stockholm: KTH.
Boronenko, Yu. P. and Orlova, A. On possibility to operate the articulated two-frame container flat wagon on the Russian railways. Proceedings of the 11th Mini Conference on Vehicle System Dynamics, Identification and Anomalies, I. Edited by: Zobory. pp.277–284. Budapest: Komaromi Nyomda es Kiado Kft. ISBN 978–963-313-011-7
N.N. Kudryavtsev (ed.),[Dynamic loads in running gears of freight wagons], Sbornik trudov VNIIZhT, Moscow, Transport, No. 572, 1997, pp. 4–27 (in Russian)
Romen, Yu. S., Kazhaev, A. N., Koval, V. A. and Ignatenkov, G. I. 2005. “A wheel set for study of railway vehicle and track interaction forces/Rail Vehicle Dynamics and associated Problems”. Gliwice