Kinematic calibration of a five-bar planar parallel robot using all working modes

Briot, 2007, Are parallel robots more accurate than serial robots, Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering, 31, 445, 10.1139/tcsme-2007-0032 Tlusty, 1999, Fundamental comparison of the use of serial and parallel kinematics for machine tools, CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology, 48, 351, 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63200-4 Merlet, 2006 Everett LJ, Lin CY. Kinematic calibration of manipulators with closed loop actuated joints. In: Proceedings IEEE international conference on robotics and automation; 1988. p. 792–7. Everett, 1989, Forward calibration of closed-loop jointed manipulators, The International Journal of Robotics Research, 8, 85, 10.1177/027836498900800405 Durango S, Restrepo D, Ruiz O, Restrepo-Giraldo J, Achiche A. Kinematic identification of parallel mechanisms by a divide and conquer strategy. In: Proceedings of the ICINCO 2010—7th, international conference on informatics in control, automation and robotics, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, 15–18 June 2010. Ding Q, Sun L,Ji J, Zhang L. Calibration of a 2-DOF planar parallel robot: home position identification and experimental verification. In: Proceedings of the international conference on mechatronics and automation, Niagara Falls, Canada; July 2005. Campos L, Bourbonnais F, Bonev IA, Bigras P. Development of a five-bar parallel robot with large workspace. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2010, international design engineering technical conferences, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; 15–18 August 2010. Slamani, 2012, Assessment of the positioning performance of an industrial robot, Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 39, 57, 10.1108/01439911211192501 Joubair, 2012, Kinematic calibration of a 3-DOF planar parallel robot. Industrial Robot:, An International Journal, 39, 392 Ota, 2002, Forward kinematic calibration and gravity compensation for parallel-mechanism-based machine tools, Journal of Multi-body Dynamics, 216, 39 Takeda Y, Shen G, Fanabashi HA. DBB-based kinematic calibration method for in-parallel actuated mechanisms using a Fourier series. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2002 design engineering technical conferences and computer and information in engineering conference, Montreal, QC, Canada; 2002. Kim, 2005, Kinematic calibration of a Cartesian parallel manipulator, International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, 3, 453 Mooring BW, Tang G-R. Improved method for identifying the kinematic parameters in a six axis robot. In: Proceedings of the 1984 ASME international computers in engineering conference; 1984. p. 79–84. Veitschegger WK, Wu CH. A method for calibrating and compensating robot kinematic errors. In: Proceedings IEEE International conference on robotics and automation; 1987. p. 39–44. Zhong XL, Lewis JM. A new method for autonomous robot calibration. In: Proceedings IEEE international conference on robotics and automation; 1995. p. 1790–95. Last, 2006 Bennett, 1991, Autonomous calibration of single-loop closed kinematic chains formed by manipulators with passive endpoint constraints, IEEE Transactions on Robotics & Automation, 7, 597, 10.1109/70.97871 Edwards, 1994, A single-point calibration technique for a six degree-of-freedom articulated arm, The International Journal of Robotics Research, 13, 189, 10.1177/027836499401300301 Meggiolaro MA, Scriffignano G, Dubowsky S. Manipulator calibration using a single endpoint contact constraint. In: Proceedings of the 26th biennial mechanisms and robotics conference of the 2000 ASME design engineering technical conferences; 2000. Sun Y, Hollerbach JM. Observability index selection for robot calibration. In: Proceedings IEEE international conference on robotics and automation; 2008.p. 831–6. Horne, 2009, Comparison of pose selection criteria for kinematic calibration through simulation, Computational Kinematics, 291, 10.1007/978-3-642-01947-0_36 Borm JH, Menq CH. Experimental study of observability of parameter errors in robot calibration. In: Proceedings IEEE international conference on robotics and automation; 1989. p. 587–92. Driels, 1990, Significance of observation strategy on the design of robot calibration experiments, Journal of Robotic Systems, 7, 197, 10.1002/rob.4620070206 Nahvi J, Hollerbach J. The noise amplification index for optimal pose selection in robot calibration. In: Proceedings IEEE international conference on robotics and automation; 1996. p. 647–53. Daney, 2005, Choosing measurement poses for robot calibration with the local convergence method and Tabu search, The International Journal of Robotics Research, 24, 501, 10.1177/0278364905053185 Li T, Sun K, Jin Y, Liu H. A novel optimal calibration algorithm on a dexterous 6 DOF serial robot-with the optimization of measurement poses number. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Shanghai, China; 9–11 June 2011. Nategh, 2009, A total solution to kinematic calibration of hexapod machine tools with a minimum number of measurement configurations and superior accuracies, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 49, 1155, 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.08.009 Menq, 1989, Identification and observability measure of a basis set of error parameters in robot calibration, Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design, 111, 513, 10.1115/1.3259031 Borm, 1991, Determination of optimal measurement configurations for robot calibration based on observability measure, The International Journal of Robotics Research, 10, 51, 10.1177/027836499101000106