Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed Ecological Footprint and biological capacity assessments

Land Use Policy - Tập 21 - Trang 231-246 - 2004
C. Monfreda1, M. Wackernagel1, D. Deumling1
1Redefining Progress, 1904 Franklin St., 6th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Barrett, 2002 Best Foot Forward, 2002. City Limits—a resource flow and ecological footprint analysis of Greater London. Chartered Institution of Wastes Management—Environmental Body, London, www.citylimitslondon.com British Petroleum, 2001. Statistical Review of World Energy 2001. British Petroleum, London, http://www.bp.com/centres/energy/ CDIAC, 1999. Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Fossil-Fuel Consumption and Cement Manufacture. Oak Ridge, Tennessee, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC), http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov De Groot, 2003, Importance and threat as determining factors for criticality of natural capital, Ecological Economics, 44, 165, 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00273-2 Ekins, 2003, Identifying critical natural capital, Ecological Economics, 44, 159, 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00271-9 Erb, K.-H., 2004. Actual land demand of Austria 1926–2000: a variation on Ecological Footprint assessments. Land Use Policy, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.010. Eurostat, 2000. Towards Environmental Pressure Indicators for the EU. Eurostat, European Commission, Luxembourg. Ferguson, 1999, The logical foundations of Ecological Footprints, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1, 149, 10.1023/A:1010070927485 Ferguson, 2001, Comments on eco-footprinting, Ecological Economics, 37, 1, 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00284-6 FAO, 1997. The State of the World's Fisheries and Aquaculture 1996. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Fisheries Department, Rome. FAO, 1998. Global Fibre Supply Model. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Rome. FAO, 1999. FAOSTAT 98 CD-ROM. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Rome. FAO, 2000a. Forest Resource Assessment 2000. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Forestry Department, Rome. FAO, 2000b. FISHSTAT Plus CD-ROM. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Fisheries Department, Rome. FAO and UNECE, 2000. Temperate and Boreal Forest Resource Assessment 2000. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Rome. Haberl, 2001, How to calculate and interpret Ecological Footprints for long periods of time, Ecological Economics, 38, 25, 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00152-5 Haberl, H., Wackernagel, M., Krausmann, F., Erb, K.-H., Schulz, N.B., Monfreda, C., 2004. Ecological Footprints and human appropriation of net primary production: a Comparison. Land Use Policy, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.008. IPCC, 1997. Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for national Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Workbook, Vol. 2. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), UK Meteorological Office, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), International Energy Agency (IEA), Geneva, Switzerland. IPCC, 2001. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge, UK. IEA, 2001. CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion. International Energy Agency (IEA) of the OECD, Paris, France. IIASA and FAO, 2000. Global Agro-Ecological Zones (GAEZ) 2000 CD-ROM. International Institute for Applied Systems Analsis (IIASA) and Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Rome. Lenzen, 2001, A modified Ecological Footprint method and its application to Australia, Ecological Economics, 37, 229, 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00275-5 Loh, J. (Ed.), 2002. Living Planet Report 2002. World-Wide Fund for Nature International (WWF), UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Redefining Progress, Center for Sustainability Studies, Gland, Switzerland. Luck, 2001, The urban funnel model and the spatially heterogeneous Ecological Footprint, Ecosystems, 4, 782, 10.1007/s10021-001-0046-8 Pauly, 1995, Primary production required to sustain global fisheries, Nature, 374, 255, 10.1038/374255a0 Pearce, 1989 Rees, 1999, Monetary analysis, Ecological Economics, 29, 47, 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00079-2 Sanderson, 2002, The human footprint and the last of the wild, BioScience, 52, 891, 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0891:THFATL]2.0.CO;2 SEI, 1998. Conventional worlds: technical description of bending the curve scenarios. PoleStar Series Report no. 8. Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), Stockholm. Sharp, G.D., 1988. Fish populations and fisheries: their perturbations, natural and man induced. In: Postma, H., Zijlstra, J.J. (Eds.), Ecosystems of the World, Vol. 27, No. 6. Elsevier, New York, pp. 155-202. Simmons, 2000, Two feet—two approaches, Ecological Economics, 32, 375 Steinfeld, H., de Haan, C. (Eds.), 1997. Livestock–environment Interactions: Issues and Options. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the United States Agency for International Development and the World Bank, European Commission Directorate-General for Development, Development Policy Sustainable Development and Natural Resources. Harvey, Blackburn. Stöglehner, 2003, Ecological Footprint—a tool for assessing sustainable energy supplies, Journal of Cleaner Production, 11, 267, 10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00046-X Sturm, A., Wackernagel, M., Müller, K., 2000. The Winners and Losers in Global Competition: Why Eco-efficiency Reinforces Competitiveness: a Study of 44 Nations. Verlag Rüegger, Chur, Zürich. Van Vuuren, D.P., Smeets, E., de Kruijf, H., 1999. The Ecological Footprint of Benin, Bhutan, Costa Rica, and the Netherlands. RIVM report, Bilthoven, NL. Wackernagel, 1999, Natural capital accounting with the Ecological Footprint concept, Ecological Economics, 29, 375, 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)90063-5 Wackernagel, M., Monfreda, C., Erb, K.-H., Haberl, H., Schulz, N., 2004a. Ecological Footprint time series of Austria, the Philippines, and South Korea for 1961–1999: comparing the conventional approach to an ‘actual land demand’ approach. Land Use Policy, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.007. Wackernagel, M., Monfreda, C., Schulz, N.B., Erb, K.-H., Haberl, H., Krausmann, F., 2004b. Calculating national and global Ecological Footprint time series: resolving conceptual challenges. Land Use Policy, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.006. Wrbka, T., Erb, K.-H., Schulz, N.B., Peterseil, J., Hahn, C.O., Haberl, H., 2004. Linking pattern and process in cultural landscapes. An empirical study based on spatially explicit indicators. Land Use Policy, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.012. WRI, 2000. World Resources 2000–2001—People and Ecosystems: The Fraying Web of Life. World Resources Institute (WRI), Washington DC, USA.