Current Advances in 3D Bioprinting Technology and Its Applications for Tissue Engineering

Gaharwar, 2016, 3D Biomaterial Microarrays for Regenerative Medicine: Current State-of-the-Art, Emerging Directions and Future Trends, Adv. Mater., 28, 771, 10.1002/adma.201503918

Hollister, 2005, Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering, Nat. Mater., 4, 518, 10.1038/nmat1421

Sin, 2010, Polyurethane (PU) scaffolds prepared by solvent casting/particulate leaching (SCPL) combined with centrifugation, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 30, 78, 10.1016/j.msec.2009.09.002

Nam, 2000, A novel fabrication method of macroporous biodegradable polymer scaffolds using gas foaming salt as a porogen additive, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 53, 1, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(2000)53:1<1::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-R

Oh, 2003, Fabrication and characterization of hydrophilic poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/poly(vinyl alcohol) blend cell scaffolds by melt-molding particulate-leaching method, Biomaterials, 24, 4011, 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00284-9

Nam, 1999, Porous biodegradable polymeric scaffolds prepared by thermally induced phase separation, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 47, 8, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199910)47:1<8::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-L

Sultana, 2008, Fabrication of HA/PHBV composite scaffolds through the emulsion freezing/freeze-drying process and characterisation of the scaffolds, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 19, 2555, 10.1007/s10856-007-3214-3

Li, 2006, Electrospun silk-BMP-2 scaffolds for bone tissue engineering, Biomaterials, 27, 3115, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.022

Park, 2017, Development of a 3D cell printed structure as an alternative to autologs cartilage for auricular reconstruction, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., 105, 1016, 10.1002/jbm.b.33639

Jang, 2016, 3D Printed Tissue Models: Present and Future, ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng., 2, 1722, 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00129

Wust, 2011, Controlled Positioning of Cells in Biomaterials-Approaches Towards 3D Tissue Printing, J. Funct. Biomater., 2, 119, 10.3390/jfb2030119

Melchels, 2012, Additive manufacturing of tissues and organs, Prog. Polym. Sci., 37, 1079, 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.11.007

Guillemot, 2010, Bioprinting is coming of age: Report from the International Conference on Bioprinting and Biofabrication in Bordeaux (3B’09), Biofabrication, 2, 010201, 10.1088/1758-5082/2/1/010201

Guvendiren, 2016, Designing Biomaterials for 3D Printing, ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng., 2, 1679, 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00121

Ji, 2017, Recent Advances in Bioink Design for 3D Bioprinting of Tissues and Organs, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 5, 23, 10.3389/fbioe.2017.00023

Vijayavenkataraman, 2018, 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for regenerative medicine, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 132, 296, 10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.004

Malda, 2013, 25th anniversary article: Engineering hydrogels for biofabrication, Adv. Mater., 25, 5011, 10.1002/adma.201302042

Keriquel, 2017, In situ printing of mesenchymal stromal cells, by laser-assisted bioprinting, for in vivo bone regeneration applications, Sci. Rep., 7, 1778, 10.1038/s41598-017-01914-x

Kacarevic, Z.P., Rider, P.M., Alkildani, S., Retnasingh, S., Smeets, R., Jung, O., Ivanisevic, Z., and Barbeck, M. (2018). An Introduction to 3D Bioprinting: Possibilities, Challenges and Future Aspects. Materials, 11.

Gudapati, 2016, A comprehensive review on droplet-based bioprinting: Past, present and future, Biomaterials, 102, 20, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.012

LaBarge, W., Morales, A., Pretorius, D., Kahn-Krell, A.M., Kannappan, R., and Zhang, J. (2019). Scaffold-Free Bioprinter Utilizing Layer-By-Layer Printing of Cellular Spheroids. Micromachines, 10.

Klebe, 1988, Cytoscribing: A method for micropositioning cells and the construction of two-and three-dimensional synthetic tissues, Exp. Cell Res., 179, 362, 10.1016/0014-4827(88)90275-3

Du, X. 3D bio-printing review In Proceedings of the The 5th Annual International Conference on Material Science and Environmental Engineering (MSEE2017); IOP Publishing: Xiamen, China, 2017; 301:012023.

Cui, 2009, Human microvasculature fabrication using thermal inkjet printing technology, Biomaterials, 30, 6221, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.056

Murphy, 2014, 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs, Nat. Biotechnol., 32, 773, 10.1038/nbt.2958

Cui, 2012, Thermal inkjet printing in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, Recent Pat. Drug Deliv. Formul., 6, 149, 10.2174/187221112800672949

Cui, 2010, Cell damage evaluation of thermal inkjet printed Chinese hamster ovary cells, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 106, 963, 10.1002/bit.22762

Landers, 2002, Rapid prototyping of scaffolds derived from thermoreversible hydrogels and tailored for applications in tissue engineering, Biomaterials, 23, 4437, 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00139-4

Ning, 2017, A brief review of extrusion-based tissue scaffold bio-printing, Biotechnol. J., 12, 1, 10.1002/biot.201600671

Unagolla, 2020, Hydrogel-based 3D bioprinting: A comprehensive review on cell-laden hydrogels, bioink formulations, and future perspectives, Appl. Mater. Today, 18, 100479, 10.1016/j.apmt.2019.100479

Billiet, 2014, The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability, Biomaterials, 35, 49, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078

Blaeser, 2016, Controlling Shear Stress in 3D Bioprinting is a Key Factor to Balance Printing Resolution and Stem Cell Integrity, Adv. Healthc. Mater., 5, 326, 10.1002/adhm.201500677

Koch, 2020, Generic method of printing window adjustment for extrusion-based 3D-bioprinting to maintain high viability of mesenchymal stem cells in an alginate-gelatin hydrogel, Bioprinting, 20, e00094, 10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00094

Odde, 1999, Laser-guided direct writing for applications in biotechnology, Trends Biotechnol., 17, 385, 10.1016/S0167-7799(99)01355-4

Derakhshanfar, 2018, 3D bioprinting for biomedical devices and tissue engineering: A review of recent trends and advances, Bioact. Mater., 3, 144

Li, 2018, Review of 3D printable hydrogels and constructs, Mater. Des., 159, 20, 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.08.023

Donderwinkel, 2017, Bio-inks for 3D bioprinting: Recent advances and future prospects, Polym. Chem., 8, 4451, 10.1039/C7PY00826K

Catros, 2011, Effect of laser energy, substrate film thickness and bioink viscosity on viability of endothelial cells printed by Laser-Assisted Bioprinting, Appl. Surf. Sci., 257, 5142, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.11.049

Hull, C.W. (1986). Apparatus for Productionof Three-Dimensional Objects by Stereolithography. (4575330 A), U.S.

Magalhaes, L., Santos, F.E.P., Elias, C.M.V., Afewerki, S., Sousa, G.F., Furtado, A.S.A., Marciano, F.R., and Lobo, A.O. (2020). Printing 3D Hydrogel Structures Employing Low-Cost Stereolithography Technology. J. Funct. Biomater., 11.

Demirci, 2007, Single cell epitaxy by acoustic picolitre droplets, Lab Chip, 7, 1139, 10.1039/b704965j

Xu, 2013, Hybrid printing of mechanically and biologically improved constructs for cartilage tissue engineering applications, Biofabrication, 5, 015001, 10.1088/1758-5082/5/1/015001

Kim, 2014, Three-dimensional electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL)/alginate hybrid composite scaffolds, Carbohydr. Polym., 114, 213, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.008

Kim, 2017, Direct 3D cell-printing of human skin with functional transwell system, Biofabrication, 9, 025034, 10.1088/1758-5090/aa71c8

Catros, 2012, Layer-by-layer tissue microfabrication supports cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo, Tissue Eng. Part C Methods, 18, 62, 10.1089/ten.tec.2011.0382

Draget, K.I. (2009). Alginates. Handbook of Hydrocolloids, Elsevier.

Lee, 2012, Alginate: Properties and biomedical applications, Prog. Polym. Sci., 37, 106, 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.06.003

Freeman, 2017, Tuning alginate bioink stiffness and composition for controlled growth factor delivery and to spatially direct MSC fate within bioprinted tissues, Sci. Rep., 7, 17042, 10.1038/s41598-017-17286-1

Panwar, A., and Tan, L.P. (2016). Current Status of Bioinks for Micro-Extrusion-Based 3D Bioprinting. Molecules, 21.

Dumbleton, 2016, The effect of RGD peptide on 2D and miniaturized 3D culture of HEPM cells, MSCs, and ADSCs with alginate hydrogel, Cell. Mol. Bioeng., 9, 277, 10.1007/s12195-016-0428-9

Oryan, 2017, Effectiveness of chitosan scaffold in skin, bone and cartilage healing, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 104, 1003, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.124

Mohebbi, 2019, Chitosan in Biomedical Engineering: A Critical Review, Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther., 14, 93, 10.2174/1574888X13666180912142028

Jin, 2004, Novel chitosan-based films cross-linked by genipin with improved physical properties, Biomacromolecules, 5, 162, 10.1021/bm034286m

Tual, 2000, Transport properties of chitosan membranes: Influence of crosslinking, J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys., 38, 1521, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(20000601)38:11<1521::AID-POLB120>3.0.CO;2-#

Ng, 2016, Polyelectrolyte gelatin-chitosan hydrogel optimized for 3D bioprinting in skin tissue engineering, Int. J. Bioprinting, 2, 53, 10.18063/IJB.2016.01.009

Van Vlierberghe, S., Graulus, G.J., Keshari Samal, S., Van Nieuwenhove, I., and Dubruel, P. (2014). Porous hydrogel biomedical foam scaffolds for tissue repair. Biomedical Foams for Tissue Engineering Applications, Elsevier.

Afewerki, 2019, Gelatin-polysaccharide composite scaffolds for 3D cell culture and tissue engineering: Towards natural therapeutics, Bioeng. Transl. Med., 4, 96, 10.1002/btm2.10124

Singh, 2019, 3D Bioprinting Using Cross-Linker-Free Silk-Gelatin Bioink for Cartilage Tissue Engineering, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 11, 33684, 10.1021/acsami.9b11644

Erkoc, 2020, 3D Printing of Cytocompatible Gelatin-Cellulose-Alginate Blend Hydrogels, Macromol. Biosci., 20, e2000106, 10.1002/mabi.202000106

Bigi, 2001, Mechanical and thermal properties of gelatin films at different degrees of glutaraldehyde crosslinking, Biomaterials, 22, 763, 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00236-2

Sakai, 2009, An injectable, in situ enzymatically gellable, gelatin derivative for drug delivery and tissue engineering, Biomaterials, 30, 3371, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.03.030

Liang, 2004, Crosslinking structures of gelatin hydrogels crosslinked with genipin or a water-soluble carbodiimide, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 91, 4017, 10.1002/app.13563

Hospodiuk, 2017, The bioink: A comprehensive review on bioprintable materials, Biotechnol. Adv., 35, 217, 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006

Visser, 2015, Endochondral bone formation in gelatin methacrylamide hydrogel with embedded cartilage-derived matrix particles, Biomaterials, 37, 174, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.020

Nichol, 2010, Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels, Biomaterials, 31, 5536, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064

Colosi, 2016, Microfluidic Bioprinting of Heterogeneous 3D Tissue Constructs Using Low-Viscosity Bioink, Adv. Mater., 28, 677, 10.1002/adma.201503310

Stratesteffen, 2017, GelMA-collagen blends enable drop-on-demand 3D printablility and promote angiogenesis, Biofabrication, 9, 045002, 10.1088/1758-5090/aa857c

Seyedmahmoud, R., Celebi-Saltik, B., Barros, N., Nasiri, R., Banton, E., Shamloo, A., Ashammakhi, N., Dokmeci, M.R., and Ahadian, S. (2019). Three-Dimensional Bioprinting of Functional Skeletal Muscle Tissue Using GelatinMethacryloyl-Alginate Bioinks. Micromachines, 10.

Peppas, 2006, Hydrogels in biology and medicine: From molecular principles to bionanotechnology, Adv. Mater., 18, 1345, 10.1002/adma.200501612

Diamantides, 2019, High density cell seeding affects the rheology and printability of collagen bioinks, Biofabrication, 11, 045016, 10.1088/1758-5090/ab3524

Osidak, 2019, Viscoll collagen solution as a novel bioink for direct 3D bioprinting, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 30, 31, 10.1007/s10856-019-6233-y

Kleinman, 1981, Role of collagenous matrices in the adhesion and growth of cells, J. Cell Biol., 88, 473, 10.1083/jcb.88.3.473

Weadock, 1995, Physical crosslinking of collagen fibers: Comparison of ultraviolet irradiation and dehydrothermal treatment, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 29, 1373, 10.1002/jbm.820291108

Harriger, 1997, Glutaraldehyde crosslinking of collagen substrates inhibits degradation in skin substitutes grafted to athymic mice, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 35, 137, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199705)35:2<137::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-O

Powell, 2006, EDC cross-linking improves skin substitute strength and stability, Biomaterials, 27, 5821, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.030

Kim, 2016, Strategy to Achieve Highly Porous/Biocompatible Macroscale Cell Blocks, Using a Collagen/Genipin-bioink and an Optimal 3D Printing Process, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 8, 32230, 10.1021/acsami.6b11669

Blaeser, 2015, The stiffness and structure of three-dimensional printed hydrogels direct the differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells toward adipogenic and osteogenic lineages, Tissue Eng. Part A, 21, 740, 10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0231

Skardal, 2012, Bioprinted amniotic fluid-derived stem cells accelerate healing of large skin wounds, Stem Cells Transl. Med., 1, 792, 10.5966/sctm.2012-0088

Park, 2014, A comparative study on collagen type I and hyaluronic acid dependent cell behavior for osteochondral tissue bioprinting, Biofabrication, 6, 035004, 10.1088/1758-5082/6/3/035004

Schacht, 2015, Biofabrication of cell-loaded 3D spider silk constructs, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 54, 2816, 10.1002/anie.201409846

Tao, 2012, Silk materials--a road to sustainable high technology, Adv. Mater., 24, 2824, 10.1002/adma.201104477

Das, 2013, Enhanced redifferentiation of chondrocytes on microperiodic silk/gelatin scaffolds: Toward tailor-made tissue engineering, Biomacromolecules, 14, 311, 10.1021/bm301193t

Das, 2015, Bioprintable, cell-laden silk fibroin-gelatin hydrogel supporting multilineage differentiation of stem cells for fabrication of three-dimensional tissue constructs, Acta Biomater., 11, 233, 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.023

Rajangam, 2013, Fibrinogen and fibrin based micro and nano scaffolds incorporated with drugs, proteins, cells and genes for therapeutic biomedical applications, Int. J. Nanomed., 8, 3641

Kim, 2016, Current status of three-dimensional printing inks for soft tissue regeneration, Tissue Eng. Regen. Med., 13, 636, 10.1007/s13770-016-0125-8

Xu, 2010, An cell-assembly derived physiological 3D model of the metabolic syndrome, based on adipose-derived stromal cells and a gelatin/alginate/fibrinogen matrix, Biomaterials, 31, 3868, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.111

England, 2017, Bioprinted fibrin-factor XIII-hyaluronate hydrogel scaffolds with encapsulated Schwann cells and their in vitro characterization for use in nerve regeneration, Bioprinting, 5, 1, 10.1016/j.bprint.2016.12.001

Lee, 2017, Biosynthesis of agar in red seaweeds: A review, Carbohydr. Polym., 164, 23, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.078

2008, Measurement of the Sol–Gel Transition Temperature in Agar, Int. J. Thermophys., 29, 2036, 10.1007/s10765-007-0332-6

Bertassoni, 2014, Hydrogel bioprinted microchannel networks for vascularization of tissue engineering constructs, Lab Chip, 14, 2202, 10.1039/C4LC00030G

Duchamp, 2019, Sacrificial Bioprinting of a Mammary Ductal Carcinoma Model, Biotechnol. J., 14, e1700703, 10.1002/biot.201700703

Gu, 2016, Functional 3D Neural Mini-Tissues from Printed Gel-Based Bioink and Human Neural Stem Cells, Adv. Healthc. Mater., 5, 1429, 10.1002/adhm.201600095

Collins, 2007, Comparison of the effectiveness of four different crosslinking agents with hyaluronic acid hydrogel films for tissue-culture applications, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 104, 3183, 10.1002/app.25993

Zuber, 2011, Chemical modifications of hyaluronic acid for the synthesis of derivatives for a broad range of biomedical applications, Carbohydr. Polym., 85, 469, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.03.019

Gaetani, 2015, Epicardial application of cardiac progenitor cells in a 3D-printed gelatin/hyaluronic acid patch preserves cardiac function after myocardial infarction, Biomaterials, 61, 339, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.005

Noh, 2019, 3D printable hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel for its potential application as a bioink in tissue engineering, Biomater. Res., 23, 3, 10.1186/s40824-018-0152-8

Kleinman, 2005, Matrigel: Basement membrane matrix with biological activity, Semin. Cancer Biol., 15, 378, 10.1016/j.semcancer.2005.05.004

Hughes, 2010, Matrigel: A complex protein mixture required for optimal growth of cell culture, Proteomics, 10, 1886, 10.1002/pmic.200900758

Loo, 2015, Peptide bioink: Self-assembling nanofibrous scaffolds for three-dimensional organotypic cultures, Nano Lett., 15, 6919, 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02859

Poldervaart, 2014, Prolonged presence of VEGF promotes vascularization in 3D bioprinted scaffolds with defined architecture, J. Control Release, 184, 58, 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.04.007

Berg, 2018, Optimization of cell-laden bioinks for 3D bioprinting and efficient infection with influenza A virus, Sci. Rep., 8, 13877, 10.1038/s41598-018-31880-x

Raghavendra, 2017, Bioceramics in endodontics - a review, J. Istanb. Univ. Fac. Dent., 51, S128

Baume, A.S., Boughton, P.C., Coleman, N.V., and Ruys, A.J. (2016). Sterilization of tissue scaffolds. Characterisation and Design of Tissue Scaffolds, Woodhead Publishing.

Kim, 2019, Collagen/bioceramic-based composite bioink to fabricate a porous 3D hASCs-laden structure for bone tissue regeneration, Biofabrication, 12, 015007, 10.1088/1758-5090/ab436d

Woodruff, 2010, The return of a forgotten polymer—Polycaprolactone in the 21st century, Prog. Polym. Sci., 35, 1217, 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002

Yeo, 2014, Cell-printed hierarchical scaffolds consisting of micro-sized polycaprolactone (PCL) and electrospun PCL nanofibers/cell-laden alginate struts for tissue regeneration, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2, 314, 10.1039/C3TB21163K

Shim, 2012, Bioprinting of a mechanically enhanced three-dimensional dual cell-laden construct for osteochondral tissue engineering using a multi-head tissue/organ building system, J. Micromech. Microeng., 22, 085014, 10.1088/0960-1317/22/8/085014

Murphy, 2017, 3D bioprinting of stem cells and polymer/bioactive glass composite scaffolds for tissue engineering, Int. J. Bioprinting, 3, 53, 10.18063/IJB.2017.01.005

Lee, 2013, Cell-laden poly(varepsilon-caprolactone)/alginate hybrid scaffolds fabricated by an aerosol cross-linking process for obtaining homogeneous cell distribution: Fabrication, seeding efficiency, and cell proliferation and distribution, Tissue Eng. Part C Methods, 19, 784, 10.1089/ten.tec.2012.0651

Kundu, 2015, An additive manufacturing-based PCL-alginate-chondrocyte bioprinted scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering, J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med., 9, 1286, 10.1002/term.1682

Izadifar, 2016, Analyzing Biological Performance of 3D-Printed, Cell-Impregnated Hybrid Constructs for Cartilage Tissue Engineering, Tissue Eng. Part C Methods, 22, 173, 10.1089/ten.tec.2015.0307

Lee, 2016, Development of a 3D cell printed construct considering angiogenesis for liver tissue engineering, Biofabrication, 8, 015007, 10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/015007

Alcantar, 2000, Polyethylene glycol–coated biocompatible surfaces, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 51, 343, 10.1002/1097-4636(20000905)51:3<343::AID-JBM7>3.0.CO;2-D

Lee, 2014, 3D printing of composite tissue with complex shape applied to ear regeneration, Biofabrication, 6, 024103, 10.1088/1758-5082/6/2/024103

Cheng, 2017, Preparation and characterization of photocured poly (epsilon-caprolactone) diacrylate/poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate/chitosan for photopolymerization-type 3D printing tissue engineering scaffold application, Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl., 81, 66, 10.1016/j.msec.2017.07.025

Aduba, 2019, Vat photopolymerization 3D printing of acid-cleavable PEG-methacrylate networks for biomaterial applications, Mater. Today Commun., 19, 204, 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.01.003

Benoit, 2006, Manipulations in hydrogel degradation behavior enhance osteoblast function and mineralized tissue formation, Tissue Eng., 12, 1663, 10.1089/ten.2006.12.1663

Gao, 2015, Improved properties of bone and cartilage tissue from 3D inkjet-bioprinted human mesenchymal stem cells by simultaneous deposition and photocrosslinking in PEG-GelMA, Biotechnol. Lett., 37, 2349, 10.1007/s10529-015-1921-2

Kolesky, 2014, 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs, Adv. Mater., 26, 3124, 10.1002/adma.201305506

Marin, 2014, A review of polyvinyl alcohol derivatives: Promising materials for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications, Afr. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 8, 674

Aslam, 2018, Polyvinyl alcohol: A review of research status and use of polyvinyl alcohol based nanocomposites, Polym. Eng. Sci., 58, 2119, 10.1002/pen.24855

Seok, 2019, Fabrication and characterization of 3D scaffolds made from blends of sodium alginate and poly(vinyl alcohol), Mater. Today Commun., 19, 56, 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.09.013

Zhou, 2020, In vitro evaluation of poly (vinyl alcohol)/collagen blended hydrogels for regulating human periodontal ligament fibroblasts and gingival fibroblasts, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 163, 1938, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.033

Bee, 2018, Approaches to Improve Therapeutic Efficacy of Biodegradable PLA/PLGA Microspheres: A Review, Polym. Rev., 58, 495, 10.1080/15583724.2018.1437547

Cheng, 2009, Polylactic acid (PLA) synthesis and modifications: A review, Front. Chem. China, 4, 259, 10.1007/s11458-009-0092-x

Deng, 2020, Modification of PLGA Scaffold by MSC-Derived Extracellular Matrix Combats Macrophage Inflammation to Initiate Bone Regeneration via TGF-beta-Induced Protein, Adv. Healthc. Mater., 9, e2000353, 10.1002/adhm.202000353

Schroepfer, 2020, Gas-Phase Fluorination on PLA Improves Cell Adhesion and Spreading, ACS Omega, 5, 5498, 10.1021/acsomega.0c00126

Yan, 2020, Surface modified electrospun poly(lactic acid) fibrous scaffold with cellulose nanofibrils and Ag nanoparticles for ocular cell proliferation and antimicrobial application, Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl., 111, 110767, 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110767

Chang, 2017, Injectable scaffolds: Preparation and application in dental and craniofacial regeneration, Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep., 111, 1, 10.1016/j.mser.2016.11.001

Kamoun, 2017, A review on polymeric hydrogel membranes for wound dressing applications: PVA-based hydrogel dressings, J. Adv. Res., 8, 217, 10.1016/j.jare.2017.01.005

Cirillo, G., Spizzirri, U.G., Curcio, M., Nicoletta, F.P., and Iemma, F. (2019). Injectable Hydrogels for Cancer Therapy over the Last Decade. Pharmaceutics, 11.

Choe, G., Park, J., Park, H., and Lee, J.Y. (2018). Hydrogel Biomaterials for Stem Cell Microencapsulation. Polymers, 10.

Sampath, U., Ching, Y.C., Chuah, C.H., Sabariah, J.J., and Lin, P.C. (2016). Fabrication of Porous Materials from Natural/Synthetic Biopolymers and Their Composites. Materials, 9.

Lee, 2019, Immobilization of planktonic algal spores by inkjet printing, Sci. Rep., 9, 12357, 10.1038/s41598-019-48776-z

Muzzarelli, 2015, Genipin-Crosslinked Chitosan Gels and Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering and Regeneration of Cartilage and Bone, Mar. Drugs, 13, 7314, 10.3390/md13127068

Marzec, 2018, Efficacy evaluation of electric field frequency and temperature on dielectric properties of collagen cross-linked by glutaraldehyde, Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces, 162, 345, 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.12.005

Rose, 2014, Gelatin-Based Materials in Ocular Tissue Engineering, Materials, 7, 3106, 10.3390/ma7043106

Mansur, 2008, FTIR spectroscopy characterization of poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogel with different hydrolysis degree and chemically crosslinked with glutaraldehyde, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 28, 539, 10.1016/j.msec.2007.10.088

Aszodi, 2006, What mouse mutants teach us about extracellular matrix function, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 22, 591, 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010305.104258

Gopinathan, 2018, Recent trends in bioinks for 3D printing, Biomater. Res., 22, 11, 10.1186/s40824-018-0122-1

Gilbert, 2006, Decellularization of tissues and organs, Biomaterials, 27, 3675

Pati, 2014, Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink, Nat. Commun., 5, 3935, 10.1038/ncomms4935

Pati, 2015, Biomimetic 3D tissue printing for soft tissue regeneration, Biomaterials, 62, 164, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.043

Crapo, 2011, An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes, Biomaterials, 32, 3233, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.057

Raphael, 2017, 3D cell bioprinting of self-assembling peptide-based hydrogels, Mater. Lett., 190, 103, 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.12.127

Imani, 2012, Optimization and comparison of two different 3D culture methods to prepare cell aggregates as a bioink for organ printing, Biocell, 36, 37, 10.32604/biocell.2012.36.037

Itoh, M., Nakayama, K., Noguchi, R., Kamohara, K., Furukawa, K., Uchihashi, K., Toda, S., Oyama, J., Node, K., and Morita, S. (2015). Scaffold-Free Tubular Tissues Created by a Bio-3D Printer Undergo Remodeling and Endothelialization when Implanted in Rat Aortae. PLoS ONE, 10.

Murata, 2020, Osteochondral regeneration using scaffold-free constructs of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells made by a bio three-dimensional printer with a needle-array in rabbits, Regen. Ther., 15, 77, 10.1016/j.reth.2020.05.004

Carrow, 2015, Bioinspired Polymeric Nanocomposites for Regenerative Medicine, Macromol. Chem. Phys., 216, 248, 10.1002/macp.201400427

Hassan, 2019, 3D printing of biopolymer nanocomposites for tissue engineering: Nanomaterials, processing and structure-function relation, Eur. Polym. J., 121, 109340, 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.109340

Thakur, 2016, Photocrosslinkable and elastomeric hydrogels for bone regeneration, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A, 104, 879, 10.1002/jbm.a.35621

Gaharwar, 2014, Nanocomposite hydrogels for biomedical applications, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 111, 441, 10.1002/bit.25160

Tayeb, A.H., Amini, E., Ghasemi, S., and Tajvidi, M. (2018). Cellulose Nanomaterials-Binding Properties and Applications: A Review. Molecules, 23.

Gopakumar, D.A., Thomas, S., and Grohens, Y. (2016). Nanocelluloses as Innovative Polymers for Membrane Applications, Elsevier.

Ummartyotin, 2015, A critical review on cellulose: From fundamental to an approach on sensor technology, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 41, 402, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.050

Han, 2020, Effects of nanocellulose on Alginate/Gelatin Bio-inks for Extrusion-based 3D Printing, BioResources, 15, 7357, 10.15376/biores.15.4.7357-7373

Bajaj, 2014, 3D biofabrication strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 16, 247, 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071813-105155

Rastogi, 2019, Review of alginate-based hydrogel bioprinting for application in tissue engineering, Biofabrication, 11, 042001, 10.1088/1758-5090/ab331e

Lee, 2013, Cell(MC3T3-E1)-printed poly(-caprolactone)/alginate hybrid scaffolds for tissue regeneration, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 34, 142, 10.1002/marc.201200524

Xavier, 2015, Bioactive nanoengineered hydrogels for bone tissue engineering: A growth-factor-free approach, ACS Nano, 9, 3109, 10.1021/nn507488s

Lee, 2020, Bone-derived dECM/alginate bioink for fabricating a 3D cell-laden mesh structure for bone tissue engineering, Carbohydr. Polym., 250, 116914, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116914

Zhang, 2020, Optimization of mechanical stiffness and cell density of 3D bioprinted cell-laden scaffolds improves extracellular matrix mineralization and cellular organization for bone tissue engineering, Acta Biomater., 114, 307, 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.07.016

Huckle, 2003, Differentiated chondrocytes for cartilage tissue engineering, Novartis Found. Symp., 249, 103, 10.1002/0470867973.ch8

Markstedt, 2015, 3D Bioprinting Human Chondrocytes with Nanocellulose-Alginate Bioink for Cartilage Tissue Engineering Applications, Biomacromolecules, 16, 1489, 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00188

Kang, 2016, A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity, Nat. Biotechnol., 34, 312, 10.1038/nbt.3413

Costantini, 2016, 3D bioprinting of BM-MSCs-loaded ECM biomimetic hydrogels for in vitro neocartilage formation, Biofabrication, 8, 035002, 10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035002

Gleadall, 2020, Multi-material 3D bioprinting of porous constructs for cartilage regeneration, Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl., 109, 110578, 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110578

Ni, 2020, 3D Bioprinting of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Laden Silk Fibroin Double Network Scaffolds for Cartilage Tissue Repair, Bioconjug. Chem., 31, 1938, 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00298

Jin, 2014, Biphasic nanofibrous constructs with seeded cell layers for osteochondral repair, Tissue Eng. Part C Methods, 20, 895, 10.1089/ten.tec.2013.0521

Daley, 2019, Development of Modular, Dual-Perfused Osteochondral Constructs for Cartilage Repair, Tissue Eng. Part C Methods, 25, 127, 10.1089/ten.tec.2018.0356

Heljak, 2020, Mechanical properties of hybrid triphasic scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering, Mater. Lett., 261, 126893, 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.126893

Qiao, 2021, Bioinspired stratified electrowritten fiber-reinforced hydrogel constructs with layer-specific induction capacity for functional osteochondral regeneration, Biomaterials, 266, 120385, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120385

Yu, J., Lee, S., Choi, S., Kim, K.K., Ryu, B., Kim, C.Y., Jung, C.-R., Min, B.-H., Xin, Y.-Z., and Park, S.A. (2020). Fabrication of a Polycaprolactone/Alginate Bipartite Hybrid Scaffold for Osteochondral Tissue Using a Three-Dimensional Bioprinting System. Polymers, 12.

Park, 2019, Experimental Tracheal Replacement Using 3-dimensional Bioprinted Artificial Trachea with Autologous Epithelial Cells and Chondrocytes, Sci. Rep., 9, 2103, 10.1038/s41598-019-38565-z

Ke, 2019, Bioprinted trachea constructs with patient-matched design, mechanical and biological properties, Biofabrication, 12, 015022, 10.1088/1758-5090/ab5354

Kim, 2020, Transplantation of a 3D-printed tracheal graft combined with iPS cell-derived MSCs and chondrocytes, Sci. Rep., 10, 4326, 10.1038/s41598-020-61405-4

Kim, 2019, Advanced drug delivery systems and artificial skin grafts for skin wound healing, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 146, 209, 10.1016/j.addr.2018.12.014

Albanna, 2019, In Situ Bioprinting of Autologous Skin Cells Accelerates Wound Healing of Extensive Excisional Full-Thickness Wounds, Sci. Rep., 9, 1856, 10.1038/s41598-018-38366-w

Admane, 2019, Direct 3D bioprinted full-thickness skin constructs recapitulate regulatory signaling pathways and physiology of human skin, Bioprinting, 15, e00051, 10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00051

Hafezi, F., Shorter, S., Tabriz, A.G., Hurt, A., Elmes, V., Boateng, J., and Douroumis, D. (2020). Bioprinting and Preliminary Testing of Highly Reproducible Novel Bioink for Potential Skin Regeneration. Pharmaceutics, 12.

Liu, 2021, Additive-lathe 3D bioprinting of bilayered nerve conduits incorporated with supportive cells, Bioact. Mater., 6, 219

Li, Y., Cao, X., Deng, W., Yu, Q., Sun, C., Ma, P., Shao, F., Yusif, M.M., Ge, Z., and Wang, K. (2020). 3D printable Sodium alginate-Matrigel (SA-MA) hydrogel facilitated ectomesenchymal stem cells (EMSCs) neuron differentiation. J. Biomater. Appl.

Wu, 2020, In vitro and in vivo biocompatibility evaluation of a 3D bioprinted gelatin-sodium alginate/rat Schwann-cell scaffold, Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl., 109, 110530, 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110530

Pittman, R.N. (2011). The circulatory system and oxygen transport. Regulation of Tissue Oxygenation, Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences.

Jia, 2016, Direct 3D bioprinting of perfusable vascular constructs using a blend bioink, Biomaterials, 106, 58, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.038

Gao, 2017, Tissue Engineered Bio-Blood-Vessels Constructed Using a Tissue-Specific Bioink and 3D Coaxial Cell Printing Technique: A Novel Therapy for Ischemic Disease, Adv. Funct. Mater., 27, 1700798/1-12, 10.1002/adfm.201700798

Freeman, 2019, A bioink blend for rotary 3D bioprinting tissue engineered small-diameter vascular constructs, Acta Biomater., 95, 152, 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.052

Jang, E.H., Kim, J.H., Lee, J.H., Kim, D.H., and Youn, Y.N. (2020). Enhanced Biocompatibility of Multi-Layered, 3D Bio-Printed Artificial Vessels Composed of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Polymers, 12.

Lee, 2017, Development of Liver Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Bioink for Three-Dimensional Cell Printing-Based Liver Tissue Engineering, Biomacromolecules, 18, 1229, 10.1021/acs.biomac.6b01908

Wu, 2018, 3D bioprinting of liver-mimetic construct with alginate/cellulose nanocrystal hybrid bioink, Bioprinting, 9, 1, 10.1016/j.bprint.2017.12.001

Yang, H., Sun, L., Pang, Y., Hu, D., Xu, H., Mao, S., Peng, W., Wang, Y., Xu, Y., and Zheng, Y.C. (2020). Three-dimensional bioprinted hepatorganoids prolong survival of mice with liver failure. Gut, 1–8.

Mao, 2020, Fabrication of liver microtissue with liver decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) bioink by digital light processing (DLP) bioprinting, Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl., 109, 110625, 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110625

Gori, 2020, Biofabrication of Hepatic Constructs by 3D Bioprinting of a Cell-Laden Thermogel: An Effective Tool to Assess Drug-Induced Hepatotoxic Response, Adv. Healthc. Mater., 9, e2001163, 10.1002/adhm.202001163

Homan, 2016, Bioprinting of 3D Convoluted Renal Proximal Tubules on Perfusable Chips, Sci. Rep., 6, 34845, 10.1038/srep34845

Dai, 2016, 3D bioprinted glioma stem cells for brain tumor model and applications of drug susceptibility, Biofabrication, 8, 045005, 10.1088/1758-5090/8/4/045005

Tirella, 2011, Substrate stiffness influences high resolution printing of living cells with an ink-jet system, J. Biosci. Bioeng., 112, 79, 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2011.03.019

Kim, 2020, 4D-bioprinted silk hydrogels for tissue engineering, Biomaterials, 260, 120281, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120281

Hager, 2015, Shape memory polymers: Past, present and future developments, Prog. Polym. Sci., 49–50, 3, 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.04.002

Wei, 2017, Direct-Write Fabrication of 4D Active Shape-Changing Structures Based on a Shape Memory Polymer and Its Nanocomposite, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 9, 876, 10.1021/acsami.6b12824

Yang, 2019, 4D Bioprinting: Technological Advances in Biofabrication, Macromol. Biosci., 19, e1800441, 10.1002/mabi.201800441