Exploring the architectural design process assisted in conventional design studio: a systematic literature review

Abdelhameed, W. (2017). Creativity in the initial phases of architectural design. Open House International, 42(1), 29–34.

Abdullah, N. A. G., Beh, S. C., Tahir, M. M., Ani, A. I. C., & Tawil, N. M. (2011). Architecture design studio culture and learning spaces: A holistic approach to the design and planning of learning facilities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 27–32.

Bar-Eli, A. (2020). Architectural drawings new uses in the architectural design process. Athens Journal of Architecture, 6(3), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.30958/aja.6-3-4

Belmonte, M.-V., Millán, E., Ruiz-Montiel, M., Badillo, R., Boned, J., Mandow, L., & Pérez-de-la-Cruz, J.-L. (2014). Randomness and control in design processes: An empirical study with architecture students. Design Studies, 35(4), 392–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2014.01.002

Bickert, S., & Johansson, E. (2012). Learning from the past to challenge the contemporary context of design: A collaborative enquiry investigating the effect of time on the design process. Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 5(2), 223–237.

Biskjaer, M. M., Kamari, A., Jensen, S. R., & Kirkegaard, P. H. (2021). Exploring blind spots in collaborative value creation in building design: A creativity perspective. CoDesign, 17(4), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1654521

Casakin, H., & Wodehouse, A. (2021). A systematic review of design creativity in the architectural design studio. Buildings, 11(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11010031

Cennamo, K., Brandt, C., Scott, B., Douglas, S., McGrath, M., Reimer, Y., & Vernon, M. (2011). Managing the complexity of design problems through studio-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(2), 12–36.

Charmaz, K., & Henwood, K. (2019). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 238–256). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555

Cikis, S., & Ek, F. (2010). Conceptualization by visual and verbal representations: An experience in an architectural design studio. Design Journal, 13(3), 329–354. https://doi.org/10.2752/146069210X12766130824975

Clarke, A., & Charmaz, K. (2022). Grounded theory and situational. Analysis. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036825838

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2020). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.): Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (pp. 87–116). SAGE Publications Inc.

Crowther, P. (2013). Understanding the signature pedagogy of the design studio and the opportunities for its technological enhancement. Journal of Learning Design, 6(3), 18–28.

Demirkan, H., & Hasirci, D. (2009). Hidden dimensions of creativity elements in design process. Creativity Research Journal, 21(2/3), 294–301.

Denscombe, M. (2014). The good research guide: for small-scale research projects: Vol. Fifth edition. McGraw-Hill Education; eBook Collection (EBSCOhost). https://ezp.sub.su.se/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=937947&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Dizdar, S. (2015). Architectural education, project design course and education process using examples (A. Isman, Ed.; WOS:000380487100041; Vol. 176, pp. 276–283). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.472

Dorta, T., Kinayoglu, G., & Boudhraa, S. (2016). A new representational ecosystem for design teaching in the studio. DESIGN STUDIES, 47, 164–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.003

Durmus Ozturk, S. (2020). Rethinking the black box in architecture design studio. SAGE Open, 10(2), 2158244020927408. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020927408

Eissa, D. (2019). Concept generation in the architectural design process: A suggested hybrid model of vertical and lateral thinking approaches. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100589

Franzosi, R. (2022). Content analysis (Vol. 1–4). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446271308

Grover, R., Emmitt, S., & Copping, A. (2018). The typological learning framework: The application of structured precedent design knowledge in the architectural design studio. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(4), 1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9421-4

Halawa, F., Madathil, S. C., Gittler, A., & Khasawneh, M. T. (2020). Advancing evidence-based healthcare facility design: A systematic literature review. Health Care Management Science, 23(3), 453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-020-09506-4

Ham, D. A. (2016). How designers play: The ludic modalities of the creative process. Design Issues, 32(4), 16–28.

Hargrove, R. A., & Nietfeld, J. L. (2015). The impact of metacognitive instruction on creative problem solving. Journal of Experimental Education, 83(3), 291–318.

Harputlugil, T. (2018). Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) as an assessment approach for architectural design: Case study of architectural design studio. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 6(2), 217–245. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2018.53

Haupt, G. (2015). Learning from experts: Fostering extended thinking in the early phases of the design process. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 25(4), 483–520.

Hisarligil, B. (2012). Franz Kafka in the Design Studio: A hermeneutic-phenomenological approach to architectural design education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 31(3), 256–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2012.01764.x

Hong, Y.-C., & Choi, I. (2011). Three dimensions of reflective thinking in solving design problems: A conceptual model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 687.

Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

Ismail, M. A., Mahmud, R., & Hassan, I. S. (2012). Digital studio vs. conventional in teaching architectural design process. In 12th International Educational Technology Conference—IETC 2012 (Vol. 64, pp. 18–25). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.003

Jabeen, H., Kabir, K. H., & Aziz, T. (2021). Balancing rationalism with creativity: An architectural studio’s experience of responsive design solutions. Environment & Urbanization, 33(1), 63–82.

Karslı, U. T. (2015). Factors influencing function and form decisions of interior architectural design studio students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1090–1098.

Kavousi, S., Miller, P. A., & Alexander, P. A. (2019). Modeling metacognition in design thinking and design making. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09521-9

KhakZand, M., & Babaei, S. (2018). Developing a new method for the architectural design process: An experimental study using found-object art in the design studio. Design Journal, 21(2), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2018.1429368

Kim, D. Y. (2019). A Design methodology using prototyping based on the digital-physical models in the architectural design process. Sustainability, 11(16), 4416–4416. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164416

Kurak Acici, F. (2015). A studio study on re-interpret the comments of a brand in the design training (F. Ozdamli, Ed.; WOS:000380397600042; Vol. 182, pp. 295–300). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.769

Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified. Architectural Press.

Lizondo-Sevilla, L., Bosch-Roig, L., Ferrer-Ribera, C., & Alapont-Ramon, J. (2019). Teaching architectural design through creative practices. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 36(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.4305/METU.JFA.2019.1.8

Mahdavinejad, M., & Pourbaqer, S. (2014). The impacts of formalistic approach in architectural design process on quality of students’ learning, case: Design studio II, IV. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 271–277.

Mahdavinejad, M., Shahrigharahkoshan, S., & Ghasempourabadi, M. (2012). The role of site analysis in creativity of students of bachelor of architecture, case: Design studio III. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 1000–1004.

Marvasti, A. B. (2020). The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 354–366). Berlin: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243

Nazidizaji, S., Tomé, A., & Regateiro, F. (2015). Does the smartest designer design better? Effect of intelligence quotient on students’ design skills in architectural design studio. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 4(4), 318–329.

Neuendorf KA (2022) The content analysis guidebook (Second). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802878

Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2010). A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1954824

Önal, G. K., & Turgut, H. (2017). Cultural schema and design activity in an architectural design studio. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 6(2), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2017.02.006

Orbey, B., & Erdogdu, G. (2021). Design process re-visited in the first year design studio: Between intuition and reasoning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(4), 771–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09573-2

Pallasmaa, J. (2013). The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses [Elektronisk resurs]. Wiley.

Pallasmaa, J. (2014). Empathic imagination: Formal and experiential projection: Empathic imagination: Formal and experiential projection. Architectural Design, 84(5), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1812

Pallasmaa, J. (2019). Design for sensory reality: From visuality to existential experience. Architectural Design, 89(6), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2496

Patria, A., Putra, D., & Lukito, Y. N. (2018). Architect and empathy: The importance of human experience in architectural design. International Journal of Built Environment and Scientific Research, 02(01), 8.

Rahbarianyazd, R., & Nia, H. (2019a). Aesthetic cognition in architectural education: A methodological approach to develop learning process in design studios. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science Engineering and Education-IJCRSEE, 7(3), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.5937/IJCRSEE1903061R

Rahbarianyazd, R., & Nia, H. A. (2019b). Aesthetic cognition in architectural education: A methodological approach to develop learning process in design studios. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering & Education (IJCRSEE), 7, 61–69.

Raonic, A. (2015). From model to drawing and back: Reversing the design process (R. Crawford & A. Stephan, Eds.; WOS:000381380100076; pp. 788–796).

Safin, S., Détienne, F., Burkhardt, J.-M., Hébert, A.-M., & Leclercq, P. (2019). The interplay between quality of collaboration, design project evolution and outcome in an architectural design studio. CoDesign. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1699935

Sagdic, Z., & Degirmenci, A. (2015). Searching of the concept in Tirilye: An architectural design studio. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 977–983.

Saris, B. (2020). A review of engagement with creativity and creative design processes for visual communication design (VCD) learning in China. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 39(2), 306–318.

Schön, D. A. (2016). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Routledge. https://ezp.sub.su.se/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsebk&AN=1480239&site=eds-live&scope=site

Shin, C., & Thomas, J. (2015). Exploring the emotional experience of the user and designer, both in the design process and classroom. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 2267–2274.

Siddaway, D. A. (n.d.). What is a systematic literature review and how do I do one? 13.

Sinnamon, C., & Miller, E. (2021). Architectural concept design process impacted by body and movement. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09636-4

Soliman, A. M. (2017). Appropriate teaching and learning strategies for the architectural design process in pedagogic design studios. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 6(2), 204–217.

Stevens, R., Petermans, A., & Vanrie, J. (2019). Design for human flourishing: A novel design approach for a more ‘humane’ architecture. The Design Journal, 22(4), 391–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1612574

Taneri, B., & Dogan, F. (2021). How to learn to be creative in design: Architecture students’ perceptions of design, design process, design learning, and their transformations throughout their education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39. https://ezp.sub.su.se/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edselp&AN=S1871187120302558&site=eds-live&scope=site

Turgay, O. (2017). The meaning of studio practice over shadowed by technology in design process. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(12), 7659–7670. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80322

Ustaomeroglu, A. A. (2015a). Concept-interpretation-product in architectural design studios-Karadeniz Technical Universty 2nd semester sample. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1897–1906.

Uysal, M., Aydin, D., & Siramkaya, S. (2012). A model intended for building the design education in the context of cultural variety and continuity: Sille design studio (A. Ilhan, Ed.; WOS:000316256000010; Vol. 51, pp. 53–63). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.118

van Amstel, F. M. C., Hartmann, T., van der Voort, M. C., & Dewulf, G. P. M. R. (2016). The social production of design space. Design Studies, 46, 199–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.06.002

Van Dooren, E., Van Dorst, M., Asselbergs, T., Van Merrienboer, J., & Boshuizen, E. (2019). The Tacit Design Process in Architectural Design Education. Design and Technology Education, 24(1). https://ezp.sub.su.se/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1212036&site=eds-live&scope=site

van Dooren, E. (2020). Anchoring the design process. A+be: Architecture and the Built Environment, 10(20), 176. https://doi.org/10.7480/abe.2020.19.5351

van Dooren, E. J. G. C., van Merriënboer, J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., van Dorst, M., & Asselbergs, M. F. (2018). Architectural design education: “In varietate unitas.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(2), 431–449.

Weber, R. (2022). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983488

Webster, H. (2004). Facilitating critically reflective learning: Excavating the role of the design tutor in architectural education. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 2(3), 101–111.

Xu, L., & Izadpanahi, P. (2016). Creative architectural design with children: A collaborative design project informed by Rhodes’s theory. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 4(3–4), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2015.1043352

Yorgancıoğlu, D., & Tunalı, S. (2020). Changing pedagogic identities of tutors and students in the design studio: Case study of desk and peer critiques. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 19(1), 19–32.

Yuksel, C., & Uyaroglu, I. (2021). Experiential learning in basic design studio: Body, space and the design process. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 40, 508–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12364

Yurtkuran, S., Kırlı, G., & Taneli, Y. (2013). An Innovative approach in architectural education: Designing a utopia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 89, 821–829.

Yurtsever, B. (2012). Re-thinking Bauhaus on the Context of Architectural Education. In The World Conference on Design, Arts and Education (DAE-2012) (Vol. 51, pp. 135–139), May 1–3 2012, Antalya, Turkey. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.132