A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP

Barzilai, 1994, AHP rank reversal, normalization and aggregation rules, INFOR, 57 Belton, 1983, On a shortcoming of Saaty’s method of analytic hierarchies, Omega, 11, 228, 10.1016/0305-0483(83)90047-6 Belton, 1985, The legitimacy of rank reversal – a comment, Omega, 13, 143, 10.1016/0305-0483(85)90052-0 Belton, 2002 Dyer, 1990, Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process, Management Science, 36, 249, 10.1287/mnsc.36.3.249 Dyer, 1990, A clarification of ‘Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process’, Management Science, 36, 274, 10.1287/mnsc.36.3.274 Forman, 2001, The analytic hierarchy process: An exposition, Operations Research, 49, 469, 10.1287/opre.49.4.469.11231 French, 1988 Golden, 2003, Celebrating 25years of AHP-based decision making, Computers and Operations Research, 30, 1419, 10.1016/S0305-0548(02)00184-3 1989 Holder, 1990, Some comments on the analytic hierarchy process, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41, 1073, 10.1057/jors.1990.167 Saaty, 1977, A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234, 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5 Saaty, 1980 Saaty, 1989, Decision making, scaling, and number crunching, Decision Sciences, 20, 404, 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1989.tb01887.x Saaty, 1990, An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper ‘Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process’, Management Science, 36, 259, 10.1287/mnsc.36.3.259 Saaty, 1996 Saaty, 1997, That is not the analytic hierarchy process: What the AHP is and what it is not, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 6, 324, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199711)6:6<324::AID-MCDA167>3.0.CO;2-Q Saaty, 2000 Saaty, 2003, Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary, European Journal of Operational Research, 145, 85, 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00227-8 Saaty, 2005, “The analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes for the measurement of intangible criteria and for decision-making”, Process: What the AHP is and what it is not, 345 Saaty, 1998, Ranking by the eigenvector versus other methods in the analytic hierarchy process, Applied Mathematical Letters, 11, 121, 10.1016/S0893-9659(98)00068-8 Saaty, 1984, The legitimacy of rank reversal, Omega, 12, 513, 10.1016/0305-0483(84)90052-5 Saaty, 1983, Assessing attribute weights by ratios, Omega, 11, 9 Salo, 1997, On the measurement of preferences in the analytic hierarchy process, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 6, 309, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199711)6:6<309::AID-MCDA163>3.0.CO;2-2 Shim, 1989, Bibliography research on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 23, 161, 10.1016/0038-0121(89)90013-X Smith, 2004, Decision analysis in Management Science, Management Science, 50, 561, 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0243 Vaidya, 2006, European Journal of Operational Research, 169, 1, 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028 Vargas, 1990, An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications, European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 2, 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90056-H Watson, 1982, Assessing attribute weights, Omega, 10, 582, 10.1016/0305-0483(82)90061-5 Watson, 1983, Comment on: Assessing attribute weights by ratios, Omega, 11, 13 Zahedi, 1986, The analytic hierarchy process – A survey of the method and its applications, Interfaces, 16, 96, 10.1287/inte.16.4.96