Applying species distribution modelling to identify areas of high conservation value for endangered species: A case study using Margaritifera margaritifera (L.)
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Akaike, 1983, Information measure and model selection, Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 50, 277
Anonymous, 2005. Northern Ireland Species Action Plan – Freshwater Pearl Mussel Margaritifera margaritifera.
Anonymous, 2009. <http://www.ni-environment.gov.uk/gqa_chemmaps2004to2007.pdf>.
Araujo, R., and Ramos, M.A., 2001. Action Plans for Margaritifera auricularia and Margaritifera margaritifera in Europe. Nature and Environment, No. 117.
Arbuckle, 2002, Freshwater mussel abundance and species richness: GIS relationships with watershed land use and geology, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 59, 310, 10.1139/f02-006
Bauer, 1987, The parasitic stage of the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera (L.)) 2. Susceptibility of brown trout, Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie, 76, 403
Bauer, 1988, Threats to the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera in central Europe, Biological Conservation, 45, 239, 10.1016/0006-3207(88)90056-0
Beasley, 1999, Towards a strategy for the conservation of the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera in County Donegal, Ireland, Biological Conservation, 89, 275, 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00004-X
Beasley, 1998, Does the freshwater pearl mussel, Margaritifera margaritifera L., face extinction in Northern Ireland?, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 8, 265, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0755(199803/04)8:2<265::AID-AQC285>3.0.CO;2-V
Brambilla, 2009, GIS-models work well, but are not enough: habitat preferences of Lanius collurio at multiple levels and conservation implications, Biological Conservation, 142, 2033, 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.03.033
Buddensiek, 1995, The culture of juvenile freshwater pearl mussels Margaritifera margaritifera L. in cages: a contribution to conservation programmes and the knowledge of habitat requirements, Biological Conservation, 74, 33, 10.1016/0006-3207(95)00012-S
Burnham, 2002
Cope, 2003, Evaluation of relocation of unionid mussels to in situ refugia, Journal of Molluscan Studies, 69, 27, 10.1093/mollus/69.1.27
Cosgrove, 2001, Conservation of threatened freshwater pearl mussel populations: river management, mussel translocation and conflict resolution, Biological Conservation, 99, 183, 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00174-9
Cruickshank, J.G., 1997. Soil and The Environment: Northern Ireland. Agricultural and Environmental Science Division, DANI and The Agricultural and Environmental Science Department, The Queen’s University of Belfast.
Farren, 2010, Distribution of the common lizard (Zootoca vivipara) and landscape favourability for the species in Northern Ireland, Amphibia-Reptilia, 31, 387, 10.1163/156853810791769428
Fitter, 1986
Geist, 2007, Physicochemical stream bed characteristics and recruitment of the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera), Freshwater Biology, 52, 2299, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01812.x
Geist, 2006, The status of host fish populations and fish species richness in European freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) streams, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 16, 251, 10.1002/aqc.721
Gibson, 2004, Spatial prediction of rufous bristlebird habitat in a coastal heathland: a GIS-based approach, Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 213, 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00896.x
Guisan, 2000, Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology, Ecological Modelling, 135, 147, 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9
Hastie, L.C., and Young, M.R., 2003. Conservation of the Freshwater Pearl Mussel 2. Relationship with Salmonids. Conserving Natura 2000 Rivers Conservation Techniques Series No.3. English Nature, Peterborough.
Hastie, 2000, Physical microhabitat requirements of freshwater pearl mussels Margaritifera margaritifera (L.), Hydrobiologia, 429, 59, 10.1023/A:1004068412666
Hastie, 2001, The effects of a major flood on an endangered freshwater mussel population, Biological Conservation, 98, 107, 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00152-X
Hastie, 2003, Characterization of freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) riverine habitat using River Habitat Survey data, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 13, 213, 10.1002/aqc.560
Hernandez, 2006, The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods, Ecography, 29, 773, 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2006.04700.x
Hochberg, 1999, Can natural enemies enforce geographical range limits?, Ecogeography, 22, 268, 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb00502.x
IUCN, 1998. IUCN Guidelines for Reintroductions. Prepared by the IUCN/SSC Reintroduction Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, 10pp.
Liu, 2005, Nonparametric estimation and hypothesis testing on the partial area under receiver operating characteristic curves, Communications in Statistics Theory and Methods, 34, 2077, 10.1080/03610920500203786
McIvor, A., and Aldridge, D., 2008. The Cultivation of the Freshwater Pearl Mussel, Margaritifera margaritifera. CCW Contract Science Report No: 849. Countryside Council for Wales/Environment Agency, Bangor.
Mollusc Specialist Group, 1996. Margaritifera margaritifera. In: IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2010.1. <http://www.iucnredlist.org/>.
Morale, 2004, Preliminary study of the endangered populations of pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera (L.) in the River Tera (north–west Spain): habitat analysis and management considerations, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 14, 587, 10.1002/aqc.624
Olsson, 2009, Predicting the distribution of a suitable habitat for the white stork in Southern Sweden: identifying priority areas for reintroduction and habitat restoration, Animal Conservation, 12, 62, 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00225.x
Österling, 2008, Relationship of biotic and abiotic factors to recruitment patterns in Margaritifera margaritifera, Biological Conservation, 141, 1365, 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.004
Phillips, 2008, Modelling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation, Ecography, 31, 161, 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x
Phillips, 2006, Maximum entropy modelling of species geographic distributions, Ecological Modelling, 190, 231, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
Preston, 2007, Culturing freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera: a breakthrough in the conservation of an endangered species, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 17, 539, 10.1002/aqc.799
Reid, 2010, Homogeneous habitat can fulfil the discrete and varied resource requirements of hares but may set an ecological trap, Biological Conservation, 143, 1701, 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.041
Russel, 1994, The genetic basis of black-footed ferret reintroduction, Conservation Biology, 8, 263, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08010263.x
Sagarin, 2002, The ‘abundant centre’ distribution: to what extent is it a biogeographical rule?, Ecology Letters, 5, 137, 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00297.x
Seddon, 2007, Developing the science of reintroduction biology, Conservation Biology, 21, 303, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00627.x
Sergio, 2007, Modelling bryophyte distribution based on ecological information for extent of occurrence assessment, Biological Conservation, 135, 341, 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.10.018
Skinner, A., Young, M., and Hastie, L., 2003. Ecology of the Freshwater Pearl Mussel. Conserving Natura 2000 Rivers, Ecology Series No. 2. English Nature, Peterborough.
Strayer, 2008
Wilson, C.D., Roberts, D., 2010. Modelling distributional trends to develop management strategies for endangered species. Diversity and Distributions. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00723.
Wilson, C.D., Arnott, G., Reid, N., Roberts, D., 2010. The pitfall with PIT tags: marking freshwater bivalves for translocation induces short-term behavioural costs. Animal Behaviour. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.10.003.
Young, 1984, The reproductive biology of the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera (Linn.) in Scotland 1. Field studies, Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie, 99, 405
Ziuganov, 1994
