An ANN-based auditor decision support system using Benford's law

Decision Support Systems - Tập 50 - Trang 576-584 - 2011
Sukanto Bhattacharya1, Dongming Xu2, Kuldeep Kumar3
1Deakin University, Australia
2University of Queensland, Australia
3Bond University, Australia

Tài liệu tham khảo

Beasley, 1996, An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud, The Accounting Review, 71 Benford, 1938, The law of anomalous numbers, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 78 Bhattacharya, 2008, Forensic accounting and Benford's law, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 25, 10.1109/MSP.2007.914724 Bhattacharya, 2005, Conditional probability of actually detecting a financial fraud—a neutrosophic extension to Benford's law, International Journal of Applied Mathematics, 17 Bieker, 2002, Using simulation as a tool in selecting a retirement age under defined benefit pension plans, Journal of Economics and Finance, 26, 10.1007/BF02759716 Bonner, 1998, Fraud type and auditor litigation: an analysis of SEC accounting and auditing enforcement releases, The Accounting Review, 73 Busta, 1998, Using Benford's law and neural networks as a review procedure, Managerial Auditing Journal, 13, 10.1108/02686909810222375 Carslaw, 1988, Anomalies in income numbers: evidence of goal oriented behaviour, The Accounting Review, 63 Cho, 2007, Breaking the (Benford) law: statistical fraud detection in campaign finance, The American Statistician, 61 Coakley, 1993, Artificial neural networks applied to ratio analysis in the analytical review process, Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 2, 10.1002/j.1099-1174.1993.tb00032.x Coakley, 2000, Artificial neural networks in accounting and finance: modeling issues, Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 9, 10.1002/1099-1174(200006)9:2<119::AID-ISAF182>3.0.CO;2-Y Dalal, 2000 De Veaux, 1993, A comparison of two non-parametric estimation schemes: MARS and neural networks, Computers in Chemical Engineering, 17, 10.1016/0098-1354(93)80066-V Durtschi, 2004, The effective use of Benford's law to assist in detecting fraud in accounting data, Journal of Forensic Accounting, V Fanning, 1998, Neural network detection of management fraud using published financial data, Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 7, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1174(199803)7:1<21::AID-ISAF138>3.0.CO;2-K Fanning, 1995, Detection of management fraud: a neural network approach, Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 4, 10.1002/j.1099-1174.1995.tb00084.x Feroz, 2000, The efficacy of red flags in predicting the SEC's targets: an artificial neural networks approach, Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 9, 10.1002/1099-1174(200009)9:3<145::AID-ISAF185>3.0.CO;2-G Fishbein, 2003, Formulation and validation of simulated data for the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS), IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41, 10.1109/TGRS.2002.808325 Gokhale, 1998, Model validation using simulated data Green, 1997, Assessing the risk of management fraud through neural network technology, Auditing, 16 Hill, 1988, Random-number guessing and the first digit phenomenon, Psychological Reports, 62, 10.2466/pr0.1988.62.3.967 Huang, 2008, An investigation of Zipf's Law for fraud detection, Decision Support Systems, DSS#06-10-1826R Judge, 2009, Detecting problems in survey data using Benford's law, Journal of Human Resources, 44, 10.1353/jhr.2009.0010 Kim, 2007 Kirkos, 2007, Data mining techniques for the detection of fraudulent financial statements, Expert Systems with Applications, 32, 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.016 Kullback, 1951, On information and sufficiency, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22, 10.1214/aoms/1177729694 Kumar, 2003, Benford's law and its application in financial fraud detection, 11 Kumar, 2007, Detecting the dubious digits: Benford's law in forensic accounting, Significance: Magazine of the Royal Statistical Society, 4, 10.1111/j.1740-9713.2007.00234.x Lee, 1999, The difference between earnings and operating cash flow as an indicator of financial reporting fraud, Contemporary Accounting Research, 16, 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1999.tb00603.x Lin, 2003, A fuzzy neural network for assessing the risk of fraudulent financial reporting, Managerial Auditing Journal, 18, 10.1108/02686900310495151 Nigrini, 1996, A taxpayer compliance analysis of Benford's law, Journal of the American Taxation Association, 18 Nigrini, 1997 Nigrini, 1999, I've got your number, Journal of Accountancy, 187 Petitt, 1977, The Kolmogorov–Smirnov goodness-of-fit statistics for discrete and grouped data, Technometrics, 19, 10.2307/1268631 Pietronero, 2004, Explaining the uneven distribution of numbers in nature: the laws of Benford and Zipf, Physica A, 293 Ramos, 2003, Auditors' responsibility for fraud detection: SAS no. 99 introduces a new era in auditors' requirements, Journal of Accountancy Online Shannon, 1948, A mathematical theory of communication, Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x Shih, 1994 Steele, 2006, Powers of discrete goodness-of-fit test statistics for a uniform null against a selection of alternative distributions, communications in statistics, Simulation and Computation, 35 Summers, 1998, Fraudulent misstated financial statements and insider trading: an empirical analysis, The Accounting Review, 73 Thomas, 1989, Unusual patterns in reported earnings, The Accounting Review, 64 Watrin, 2008, Benford's law: an instrument for selecting tax audit targets, Review of Managerial Science, 2, 10.1007/s11846-008-0019-9 Welch, 1998, Using a genetic algorithm based classifier system for modeling auditor decision behavior in a fraud setting, Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 7, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1174(199809)7:3<173::AID-ISAF147>3.0.CO;2-5 Wright, 1989, Identifying audit adjustments with attention-direction procedures, The Accounting Review, 64 Zikmund, 2008, Reducing the expectation gap: forensic audit procedures, The CPA Journal Online Zipf, 1949