CXCR4 pathway associated with family history of melanoma

Cancer Causes & Control - Tập 25 - Trang 125-132 - 2013
Wen-Qing Li1, Jiali Han1,2,3, Hans R. Widlund1, Mick Correll4, Yaoyu E. Wang4, John Quackenbush4, Martin C. Mihm5, Alvaro Laga Canales6, Shaowei Wu1, Todd Golub7, Yujin Hoshida7, David J. Hunter2,3, George Murphy6, Thomas S. Kupper1, Abrar A. Qureshi1,2
1Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
2Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
3Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA
4Center for Cancer Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
5Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
6Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, USA
7Broad Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA

Tóm tắt

Genetic predisposition plays a major role in the etiology of melanoma, but known genetic markers only account for a limited fraction of family-history-associated melanoma cases. Expression microarrays have offered the opportunity to identify further genomic profiles correlated with family history of melanoma. We aimed to distinguish mRNA expression signatures between melanoma cases with and without a family history of melanoma. Based on the Nurses’ Health Study, family history was defined as having one or more first-degree family members diagnosed with melanoma. Melanoma diagnosis was confirmed by reviewing pathology reports, and tumor blocks were collected by mail from across the USA. Genomic interrogation was accomplished through evaluating expression profiling of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues from 78 primary cutaneous invasive melanoma cases, on either a 6K or whole-genome (24K) Illumina gene chip. Gene set enrichment analysis was performed for each batch to determine the differentially enriched pathways and key contributing genes. The CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) pathway was consistently up-regulated within cases of familial melanoma in both platforms. Leading edge analysis showed four genes from the CXCR4 pathway, including MAPK1, PLCG1, CRK, and PTK2, were among the core members that contributed to the enrichment of this pathway. There was no association between the enrichment of CXCR4 pathway and NRAS, BRAF mutation, or Breslow thickness of the primary melanoma cases. We found that the CXCR4 pathway might constitute a novel susceptibility pathway associated with family history of melanoma in first-degree relatives.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2013) Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 63:11–30 Flaherty KT, Infante JR, Daud A, Gonzalez R, Kefford RF, Sosman J et al (2012) Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition in melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations. N Engl J Med 367:1694–1703 Hacker E, Hayward NK, Dumenil T, James MR, Whiteman DC (2012) The association between MC1R genotype and BRAF mutation status in cutaneous melanoma: findings from an Australian population. J Invest Dermatol 130:241–248 Sosman JA, Kim KB, Schuchter L, Gonzalez R, Pavlick AC, Weber JS et al (2012) Survival in BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma treated with vemurafenib. N Engl J Med 366:707–714 Lin JY, Fisher DE (2007) Melanocyte biology and skin pigmentation. Nature 445:843–850 Qureshi AA, Zhang M, Han J (2011) Heterogeneity in host risk factors for incident melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer in a cohort of US women. J Epidemiol 21:197–203 Goldstein AM, Tucker MA (2013) Dysplastic nevi and melanoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 22:528–532 Yang XR, Liang X, Pfeiffer RM, Wheeler W, Maeder D, Burdette L et al (2010) Associations of 9p21 variants with cutaneous malignant melanoma, nevi, and pigmentation phenotypes in melanoma-prone families with and without CDKN2A mutations. Fam Cancer 9:625–633 Goldstein AM (2004) Familial melanoma, pancreatic cancer and germline CDKN2A mutations. Hum Mutat 23:630 Duffy DL, Zhao ZZ, Sturm RA, Hayward NK, Martin NG, Montgomery GW (2010) Multiple pigmentation gene polymorphisms account for a substantial proportion of risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma. J Invest Dermatol 130:520–528 Landi MT, Bauer J, Pfeiffer RM, Elder DE, Hulley B, Minghetti P et al (2006) MC1R germline variants confer risk for BRAF-mutant melanoma. Science 313:521–522 Nan H, Kraft P, Hunter DJ, Han J (2009) Genetic variants in pigmentation genes, pigmentary phenotypes, and risk of skin cancer in Caucasians. Int J Cancer 125:909–917 Fan JB, Yeakley JM, Bibikova M, Chudin E, Wickham E, Chen J et al (2004) A versatile assay for high-throughput gene expression profiling on universal array matrices. Genome Res 14:878–885 Hoshida Y, Villanueva A, Kobayashi M, Peix J, Chiang DY, Camargo A et al (2008) Gene expression in fixed tissues and outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 359:1995–2004 April C, Klotzle B, Royce T, Wickham-Garcia E, Boyaniwsky T, Izzo J et al (2009) Whole-genome gene expression profiling of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples. PLoS One 4:e8162 Spittle C, Ward MR, Nathanson KL, Gimotty PA, Rappaport E, Brose MS et al (2007) Application of a BRAF pyrosequencing assay for mutation detection and copy number analysis in malignant melanoma. J Mol Diagn 9:464–471 Sivertsson A, Platz A, Hansson J, Lundeberg J (2002) Pyrosequencing as an alternative to single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis for detection of N-ras mutations in human melanoma metastases. Clin Chem 48:2164–2170 Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F, Beazer-Barclay YD, Antonellis KJ, Scherf U et al (2003) Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 4:249–264 Smyth GK (2005) Limma: linear models for microarray data. In: Gentleman R, Carey V, Dudoit S, Irizarry R, Huber W (eds) Bioinformatics and computational biology solutions using R and Bioconductor. Springer, New York, pp 397–420 Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA et al (2005) Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:15545–15550 Mootha VK, Lindgren CM, Eriksson KF, Subramanian A, Sihag S, Lehar J et al (2003) PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat Genet 34:267–273 Teicher BA, Fricker SP (2010) CXCL12 (SDF-1)/CXCR4 pathway in cancer. Clin Cancer Res 16:2927–2931 Wu B, Chien EY, Mol CD, Fenalti G, Liu W, Katritch V et al (2010) Structures of the CXCR4 chemokine GPCR with small-molecule and cyclic peptide antagonists. Science 330:1066–1071 Wong D, Korz W (2008) Translating an antagonist of chemokine receptor CXCR4: from bench to bedside. Clin Cancer Res 14:7975–7980 Ramos EA, Grochoski M, Braun-Prado K, Seniski GG, Cavalli IJ, Ribeiro EM et al (2011) Epigenetic changes of CXCR4 and its ligand CXCL12 as prognostic factors for sporadic breast cancer. PLoS One 6:e29461 Righi E, Kashiwagi S, Yuan J, Santosuosso M, Leblanc P, Ingraham R et al (2011) CXCL12/CXCR4 blockade induces multimodal antitumor effects that prolong survival in an immunocompetent mouse model of ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 71:5522–5534 Scala S, Giuliano P, Ascierto PA, Ieranò C, Franco R, Napolitano M et al (2006) Human melanoma metastases express functional CXCR4. Clin Cancer Res 12:2427–2433 Balkwill F (2004) Cancer and the chemokine network. Nat Rev Cancer 4:540–550 Kim M, Koh YJ, Kim KE, Koh BI, Nam DH, Alitalo K et al (2010) CXCR4 signaling regulates metastasis of chemoresistant melanoma cells by a lymphatic metastatic niche. Cancer Res 70:10411–10421 Longo-Imedio MI, Longo N, Trevino I, Lazaro P, Sanchez-Mateos P (2005) Clinical significance of CXCR3 and CXCR4 expression in primary melanoma. Int J Cancer 117:861–865 Scala S, Ottaiano A, Ascierto PA, Cavalli M, Simeone E, Giuliano P et al (2005) Expression of CXCR4 predicts poor prognosis in patients with malignant melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 11:1835–1841 Sieg DJ, Hauck CR, Ilic D, Klingbeil CK, Schaefer E, Damsky CH et al (2000) FAK integrates growth-factor and integrin signals to promote cell migration. Nat Cell Biol 2:249–256 McLean GW, Carragher NO, Avizienyte E, Evans J, Brunton VG, Frame MC (2005) The role of focal-adhesion kinase in cancer—a new therapeutic opportunity. Nat Rev Cancer 5:505–515 Siesser PM, Hanks SK (2006) The signaling and biological implications of FAK overexpression in cancer. Clin Cancer Res 12:3233–3237 Anderson D, Koch CA, Grey L, Ellis C, Moran MF, Pawson T (1990) Binding of SH2 domains of phospholipase C gamma 1, GAP, and Src to activated growth factor receptors. Science 250:979–982 Delgado-Martin C, Escribano C, Pablos JL, Riol-Blanco L, Rodriguez-Fernandez JL (2011) Chemokine CXCL12 uses CXCR4 and a signaling core formed by bifunctional Akt, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2, and mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) proteins to control chemotaxis and survival simultaneously in mature dendritic cells. J Biol Chem 286:37222–37236 Ellerhorst JA, Greene VR, Ekmekcioglu S, Warneke CL, Johnson MM, Cooke CP et al (2011) Clinical correlates of NRAS and BRAF mutations in primary human melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 17:229–235 Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, Goldstein DB, Hindorff LA, Hunter DJ et al (2009) Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 461:747–753 Pedroso I (2010) Gaining a pathway insight into genetic association data. Methods Mol Biol 628:373–382