Improved pinene production in a recombinant yeast by fusion linker optimization and chaperon coexpression

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 2 - Trang 208-216 - 2021
Quanlu Ren1,2, Yaxi He1,2, Xinyao Lu1,2, Hong Zong1,2, Bin Zhuge1,2
1The Key Laboratory of Industrial Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, School of Biotechnology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China
2Research Center of Industrial Microbiology, School of Biotechnology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China

Tóm tắt

Pinene is an active natural monoterpene from plants and has important applications in flavorings, fragrances,and pesticides. Especially, pinene dimers are regarded as renewable fuels with high density. However, the microbial pinene production was limited by the low activity pinene synthase. In this study, the pinene synthase activity was improved by fusion linker optimization and chaperon coexpression. To construct the pinene pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, YPL062W gene was deleted to increase the MVA pathway precursor acetyl-CoA. Truncated 3-hydroxyl-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (tHMG1), isopentenyl-diphosphate isomerase (IDI1), and farnesyl diphosphate synthase mutant (ERG20F96W−N127W) were then integrated to improve the GPP pool. Pinene synthase tPt1 was expressed in the constructed engineered yeast, and the titer of pinene reached 0.166 mg/L. GPP is the direct precursor of pinene, ERG20ww and tPt1 were fused by different linkers and orders to improve the accessibility of GPP. Pinene titer reached 9.94 mg/L by fusion these proteins in the order of ERG20ww and tPt1 and with a flexible linker (G)8. After that, several chaperons were coexpressed and the chaperon Sil1p improved the pinene titer to 10.2 mg/L with a yield of 1.63 mg/L·OD600. The results presented here provide novel information on the applications of protein fusion and protein chaperons in microbial pinene production.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Behr A, Johnen L. Myrcene as a natural base chemical in sustainable chemistry: a critical review. Chemsuschem. 2009;2(12):1072–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.200900186. Harvey BG, Wright ME, Quintana RL. High-density renewable fuels based on the selective dimerization of pinenes. Energy Fuels. 2010;24(1):267–73. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef900799c. Lv X, Xie W, Lu W, Guo F, Gu J, Yu H, et al. Enhanced isoprene biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by engineering of the native acetyl-CoA and mevalonic acid pathways with a push-pull-restrain strategy. J Biotechnol. 2014;186:128–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.06.024. Chen Y, Daviet L, Schalk M, Siewers V, Nielsen J. Establishing a platform cell factory through engineering of yeast acetyl-CoA metabolism. Metab Eng. 2013;15:48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2012.11.002. Chen Y, Wang Y, Liu M, Qu J, Yao M, Li B, et al. Primary and secondary metabolic effects of a key gene deletion (ΔYPL062W) in metabolically engineered terpenoid-producing Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019;85:e01990-e2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2012.11.002. Zhang C, Li M, Zhao GR, Lu W. Alpha-Terpineol production from an engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell factory. Microb Cell Fact. 2019;18(1):160. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-019-1211-0. Gardner RG, Hampton RY. A ‘distributed degron’ allows regulated entry into the ER degradation pathway. EMBO J. 1999;18:5994–6004. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/18.21.5994. Liu J, Zhang W, Du G, Chen J, Zhou J. Overproduction of geraniol by enhanced precursor supply in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biotechnol. 2013;168(4):446–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.10.017. Ignea C, Pontini M, Maffei ME, Makris AM, Kampranis SC. Engineering monoterpene production in yeast using a synthetic dominant negative geranyl diphosphate synthase. ACS Synth Biol. 2014;3(5):298–306. https://doi.org/10.1021/sb400115e. Tianhua C, Ruosi Z, Guozhen J, Mingdong Y, Hong L, Ying W, et al. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for pinene production. CIESC J. 2019;70:179–88. Cheng S, Liu X, Jiang G, Wu J, Zhang JL, Lei D, et al. Orthogonal engineering of biosynthetic pathway for efficient production of limonene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. ACS Synth Biol. 2019;8(5):968–75. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.9b00135. Cataldo VF, Arenas N, Salgado V, Camilo C, Ibanez F, Agosin E. Heterologous production of the epoxycarotenoid violaxanthin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng. 2020;59:53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2020.01.006. Hu Z, Lin L, Li H, Li P, Weng Y, Zhang C, et al. Engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of the valuable monoterpene d-limonene during Chinese Baijiu fermentation. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;47(6–7):511–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-020-02284-6. Jiang GZ, Yao MD, Wang Y, Zhou L, Song TQ, Liu H, et al. Manipulation of GES and ERG20 for geraniol overproduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng. 2017;41:57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2017.03.005. Sarria S, Wong B, Garcia Martin H, Keasling JD, Peralta YP. Microbial synthesis of pinene. ACS Synth Biol. 2014;3(7):466–75. https://doi.org/10.1021/sb4001382. Payne T, Finnis C, Evans LR, Mead DJ, Avery SV, Archer DB, et al. Modulation of chaperone gene expression in mutagenized Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains developed for recombinant human albumin production results in increased production of multiple heterologous proteins. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74(24):7759–66. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01178-08. Hartl FU, Hayer-Hartl M. Converging concepts of protein folding in vitro and in vivo. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009;16(6):574–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1591. de Ruijter JC, Koskela EV, Frey AD. Enhancing antibody folding and secretion by tailoring the Saccharomyces cerevisiae endoplasmic reticulum. Microb Cell Fact. 2016;15:87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-016-0488-5. Nishihara K, Kanemori M, Yanagi H, Yura T. Overexpression of trigger factor prevents aggregation of recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66(3):884–9. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.66.3.884-889.2000. Lu X, He S, Zong H, Song J, Chen W, Zhuge B. Improved 1, 2, 4-butanetriol production from an engineered Escherichia coli by co-expression of different chaperone proteins. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;32(9):149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-016-2085-5. Liu T, Zhang C, Lu W. Heterologous production of levopimaric acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact. 2018;17(1):114. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-018-0964-1. Chen X, Fang H, Rao Z, Shen W, Zhuge B, Wang Z, et al. An efficient genetic transformation method for glycerol producer Candida glycerinogenes. Microbiol Res. 2008;163:531–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2008.05.003. Kita T, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Feedback regulation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase in livers of mice treated with mevinolin, a competitive inhibitor of the reductase. J Clin Invest. 1980;66(5):1094–100. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci109938. Ignea C, Cvetkovic I, Loupassaki S, Kefalas P, Johnson CB, Kampranis SC, et al. Improving yeast strains using recyclable integration cassettes, for the production of plant terpenoids. Microb Cell Fact. 2011;10:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-10-4. Donald KA, Hampton RY, Fritz IB. Effects of overproduction of the catalytic domain of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase on squalene synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63(9):3341–4. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.63.9.3341-3344.1997. Rico J, Pardo E, Orejas M. Enhanced production of a plant monoterpene by overexpression of the 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl Coenzyme A reductase catalytic domain in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(19):6449–54. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02987-09. Tashiro M, Kiyota H, Kawai Noma S, Saito K, Ikeuchi M, Iijima Y, et al. Bacterial production of pinene by a laboratory-evolved pinene-synthase. ACS Synth Biol. 2016;5(9):1011–20. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.6b00140. Bhandari DG, Levine BA, Trayer IP, Yeadon ME. 1H-NMR study of mobility and conformational constraints within the proline-rich N-terminal of the LC1 alkali light chain of skeletal myosin. Eur J Biochem. 1986;160(2):349–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1986.tb09978.x. Arai R, Ueda H, Kitayama A, Kamiya N, Nagamune T. Design of the linkers which effectively separate domains of a bifunctional fusion protein. Protein Eng. 2001;14(8):529–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/14.8.529. Reddy Chichili VP, Kumar V, Sivaraman J. Linkers in the structural biology of protein-protein interactions. Protein Sci. 2013;22(2):153–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.2206. Argos P. An investigation of oligopeptides linking domains in protein tertiary structures and possible candidates for general gene fusion. J Mol Biol. 1990;211(4):943–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(90)90085-z. Gong Y, Kakihara Y, Krogan N, Greenblatt J, Emili A, Zhang Z, et al. An atlas of chaperone-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: implications to protein folding pathways in the cell. Mol Syst Biol. 2009;5:275. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2009.26. Simons JF, Ferro Novick S, Rose MD, Helenius A. BiP/Kar2p serves as a molecular chaperone during carboxypeptidase Y folding in yeast. J Cell Biol. 1995;130:41–9. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.130.1.41. Kimata Y, Kimata YI, Shimizu Y, Abe H, Farcasanu IC, Takeuchi M, et al. Genetic evidence for a role of BiP/Kar2 that regulates Ire1 in response to accumulation of unfolded proteins. Mol Biol Cell. 2003;14(6):2559–69. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e02-11-0708. Xu P, Raden D, Doyle FJ 3rd, Robinson AS. Analysis of unfolded protein response during single-chain antibody expression in Saccaromyces cerevisiae reveals different roles for BiP and PDI in folding. Metab Eng. 2005;7(4):269–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2005.04.002. Friedlander R, Jarosch E, Urban J, Volkwein C, Sommer T. A regulatory link between ER-associated protein degradation and the unfolded-protein response. Nat Cell Biol. 2000;2(7):379–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/35017001. Kimata Y, Kimata YI, Shimizu Y, Abe H, Farcasanu IC, Takeuchi M, et al. Genetic evidence for a role of BiP/Kar2 that regulates Ire1 in response to accumulation of unfolded proteins. Mol Biol Cell. 2003;14:2559–69. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e02-11-0708. Bertolotti A, Zhang Y, Hendershot LM, Harding HP, Ron D. Dynamic interaction of BiP and ER stress transducers in the unfolded-protein response. Nat Cell Biol. 2000;2(6):326–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/35014014. Robinson AS, Bockhaus JA, Voegler AC, Wittrup KD. Reduction of BiP levels decreases heterologous protein secretion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:10017–22. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.17.10017. Schroder M, Kaufman RJ. ER stress and the unfolded protein response. Mutat Res. 2005;569(1–2):29–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.06.056. Steel GJ, Fullerton DM, Tyson JR, Stirling CJ. Coordinated activation of Hsp70 chaperones. Science. 2004;303(5654):98–101. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092287. Nishikawa S, Endo T. The yeast Jem1p is a DnaJ-like protein of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane required for nuclear fusion. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(20):12889–92. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.20.12889. Schlenstedt G, Harris S, Risse B, Lill R, Silver PA. A yeast DnaJ homologue, Scj1p, can function in the endoplasmic reticulum with BiP/Kar2p via a conserved domain that specifies interactions with Hsp70s. J Cell Biol. 1995;129:979–88. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.129.4.979. Frigerio G, Pelham HR. A Saccharomyces cerevisiae cyclophilin resident in the endoplasmic reticulum. J Mol Biol. 1993;233:183–8. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1993.1497. Feige MJ, Walter S, Buchner J. Folding mechanism of the CH2 antibody domain. J Mol Biol. 2004;344(1):107–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2004.09.033. Verghese J, Abrams J, Wang Y, Morano KA. Biology of the heat shock response and protein chaperones: budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a model system. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012;76(2):115–58. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.05018-11. Kim S, Schilke B, Craig EA, Horwich AL. Folding in vivo of a newly translated yeast cytosolic enzyme is mediated by the Ssa class of cytosolic yeast Hsp70 proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:12860–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.22.12860. Gaur D, Singh P, Guleria J, Gupta A, Kaur S, Sharma D. The yeast Hsp70 cochaperone Ydj1 regulates functional distinction of Ssa Hsp70s in the Hsp90 chaperoning pathway. Genetics. 2020;215:683–98. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.120.303190.