Comparison of the Effects of LASIK Retreatment Techniques on Epithelial Ingrowth Rates

Ophthalmology - Tập 114 - Trang 640-642 - 2007
Colin C.K. Chan1, Brian S. Boxer Wachler1
1Boxer Wachler Vision Institute, Beverly Hills, California.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Probst, 2000, Epithelial ingrowth, 211 Perez-Santonja, 1999, Retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis, Ophthalmology, 106, 21 Davis, 2002, LASIK enhancements: a comparison of lifting to recutting the flap, Ophthalmology, 109, 2308, 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01245-9 Zadok, 1999, Outcomes of retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis, Ophthalmology, 106, 2391, 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90545-6 Mulhern, 2001, Myopic and hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis retreatments: indications, techniques, limitations, and results, J Cataract Refract Surg, 27, 1278, 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)00981-6 Brahma, 2001, Safety and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement by flap reelevation in high myopia, J Cataract Refract Surg, 27, 593, 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)00765-9 Netto, 2004, Flap lift for LASIK retreatment in eyes with myopia, Ophthalmology, 111, 1362, 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.11.009 Wang, 2000, Epithelial ingrowth after laser in situ keratomileusis, Am J Ophthalmol, 129, 746, 10.1016/S0002-9394(00)00357-3 Jabbur, 2004, Risk factors in interface epithelialization after laser in situ keratomileusis, J Refract Surg, 20, 343, 10.3928/1081-597X-20040701-07 Taneri, 2003, Mitomycin-C assisted photorefractive keratectomy in the treatment of buttonholed laser in situ keratomileusis flaps associated with epithelial ingrowth, J Cataract Refract Surg, 31, 2026, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.06.035 Walker, 2000, Incidence and prevention of epithelial growth within the interface after laser in situ keratomileusis, Cornea, 19, 170, 10.1097/00003226-200003000-00009