Inspection Judgements on Urban Schools: A Case for the Defence
Tóm tắt
This article is co-authored by two urban school Heads in the north of England with the support of an academic partner. The article begins with the phenomenon of official judgements of urban schools, made by the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills, a semi-privatised and supposedly independent arm of government. The discussion places in question its work in raising achievement, particularly in areas of deprivation. It points to deep flaws in the operation of policy-as-numbers and high-stakes accountability, contrasting the punitive style and consequences with collaborative principles of leadership and school change. The article looks at how summative judgements gloss over the complexities of students’ lives and teachers’ work, and ignore evidence of what is actually being done to meet policy expectations. Our conclusion is that more intelligent forms of school accountability are needed which do not constantly undermine the improvement processes of urban schools and damage reputations with labels such as ‘requires improvement’ ‘special measures’ or more colloquially ‘failing school’. This ‘intelligent accountability’ might begin to support a more community-orientated moral purpose in leadership and pedagogy.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Elliott, A. (2012). Twenty years inspecting English schools—Ofsted 1992–2012. London: RISE. www.risetrust.org.uk. Accessed 7 July 2014.
Hursh, D. (2008). High-stakes testing and the decline of teaching and learning: The real crisis in education. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Inglis, F. (1989). Managerialism and morality. In W. Carr (Ed.), Quality in teaching: Arguments for a reflective professional. London: Falmer.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in US schools. AERA Presidential Address.
Lingard, B. (2009). Testing times: The need for new intelligent acccountabilities for schooling. QTU Professional Magazine, November 2009. http://www.qtu.asn.au/files/9113/2780/3358/29-01-2012_1315_170.pdf.
Lipman, P. (2004). High stakes education: Inequality, globalization and urban school reform. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
MacBeath, J. (1999). Schools must speak for themselves: The case for school self-evaluation. London: Routledge.
McNeil, L. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge.
Milner, R. (2011). Rethinking achievement gap talk in urban education. Urban Education, 48(1), 3–8.
Mitchell, C., & Sackney, L. (2000). Profound improvement: Building capacity for a learning community. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
Ozga, J., & Lingard, B. (2007). Globalisation, education policy and pollitics. In B. Lingard & J. Ozga (Eds.), The RoutledgeFalmer reader in education policy and politics. London: Routledge.
Parks, J. (2013). Detoxifying school accountability: The case for multi-perspective inspection. London: Demos.
Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York: Basic Books.
Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shaw, I., Newton, D., Aitkin, M., & Darnell, R. (2003). Do OFSTED inspections of secondary schools make a difference to GCSE results? British Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 63–75.
Smyth, J., & Wrigley, T. (2013). Living on the edge: Rethinking poverty, class and schooling. New York: Peter Lang.
Sutton, Trust. (2008). Wasted talent? Attrition rates of high-achieving pupils between school and university. www.suttontrust.com.
Wrigley, T. (2003). Schools of hope: A new agenda for school improvement. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham.