Facebook® and academic performance

Computers in Human Behavior - Tập 26 - Trang 1237-1245 - 2010
Paul A. Kirschner1, Aryn C. Karpinski2
1Centre for Learning Sciences and Technologies (CELSTEC), Open University of the Netherlands, Valkenburgerweg 177, 6419AT Heerlen, The Netherlands
2The Ohio State University, The College of Education and Human Ecology, The School of Educational Policy and Leadership, 29 West Woodruff Avenue, 210 Ramseyer Hall, Columbus, OH 43210

Tài liệu tham khảo

American Psychological Association (2006), Multitasking = Switching Costs. Available at http://www.apa.org/research/action/multitask.aspx. Astin, 1998, The changing American college student: Thirty-year trends, 1966–1996, The Review of Higher Education, 21, 115 Austin, M. (2009). Texting while driving: How dangerous is it? Car and Driver. Retrieved from http://editorial.autos.msn.com/article.aspx?cp-documentid=1076338&topart=safety via http://www.caranddriver.com. Barratt, 2005, Thefacebook.com: Computer mediated social networking, Student Affairs Online, 6, 1 Bartlett, 2008, Just say ‘A’: Grade inflation undergoes reality check, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 55, A1 Beastall, 2008, Enchanting a disenchanted child: Revolutionizing the means of education using information and communication technology and e-learning, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27, 97, 10.1080/01425690500376758 Binder, 1984, Restrictions on statistics imposed by method of measurement: Some reality, some myth, Journal of Criminal Justice, 12, 467, 10.1016/0047-2352(84)90094-1 Boyd, 2008, Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x Bullen, M., Morgan, T., Belfer, K., & Qayyum, A. (2008). The digital learner at BCIT and implications for an e-strategy. In Paper presented at the 2008 Research Workshop of the European Distance Education Network (EDEN) “Researching and promoting access to education and training: The role of distance education and e-learning in technology-enhanced environments”, Paris, France, October 20–22. Caudle, 2004, Qualitative data analysis, 417 Ciavarri, A. (2008). Students change majors frequently. The Bona Venture. From http://media.www.thebv.org/media/storage/paper1111/news/2008/01/25/News/Students.Change.Majors.Frequently-3167371.shtml. comScore (2009). Russia has world’s most engaged social networking audience. comScore, Inc. July 2. Available at http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2009/7/Russia_has_World_s_Most_Engaged_Social_Networking_Audience. DeBell, M., & Chapman, C. (2006). Computer and Internet use by students in 2003 (NCES 2006–065). US Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Ebner, M., Schiefner, M., & Nagler, W. (2008). Has the Net-Generation arrived at the university?=oder der Student von Heute, ein Digital Native? [or Contemporary student – a Digital Native?]. In S. Zauchner, P. Baumgartner, E. Blaschitz, & A. Weissenbäck (Eds.), Medien in der Wissenschaft [Media in science] (Vol. 48, pp. 113–123). Muenster, Germany: Waxmann Verlag. Espinosa, 2006, Technology in the home and the achievement of young children: Findings from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Early Education and Development, 17, 421, 10.1207/s15566935eed1703_5 Fowler, 2002 Fox, 2008, Distractions, distractions: Does instant messaging affect college students’ performance on a concurrent reading comprehension task?, Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 12, 51, 10.1089/cpb.2008.0107 Gemmill, 2006, Technology use among college students: Implications for student affairs professionals, NASPA Journal, 43, 280, 10.2202/0027-6014.1640 Gonzalez, N. (2009). CheckFacebook.com: Facebook marketing statistics, demographics, reports, and news. Accessed August 8, 2009. Goodman, 1961, Snowball sampling, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32, 148, 10.1214/aoms/1177705148 Grinter, R., & Palen, L. (2002). Instant messaging in teen life. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on computer-supported work, New Orleans, LA. Howe, 2000 Hunley, 2005, Adolescent computer use and academic achievement, Adolescence, 40, 307 Karpinski, A. C. (2009). Media sensationalization of social science research: Social-networking insites. Teachers College Record. http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=15642. Karpinski, A. C. & Duberstein, A. (April 16, 2009). A description of Facebook use and academic performance among undergraduate and graduate students. In Poster presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Gray, K., Judd, T., Waycott, J., Bennett, S., et al. (2007). The net generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: Preliminary findings. In R. J. Atkinson, C. McBeath, S. K. A. Soong, & C. Cheers (Eds.), ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings of ASCILITE 2007 conference. Centre for Educational Development, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. [Online] Retrieved July 31, 2009 from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/kennedy.pdf. Kim, 1975, Multivariate analysis of ordinal variables, American Journal of Sociology, 81, 261, 10.1086/226074 Kirschner, 2006, Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of the constructivist, discovery, problem-base, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching, Educational Psychologist, 14, 75, 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1 Kolek, 2008, Online disclosure: An empirical examination of undergraduate Facebook profiles, NASPA Journal, 45, 1, 10.2202/0027-6014.1905 Kramer, 1994, Changes in academic major among undergraduate students, College and University, 69, 88 Kubey, 2001, Internet use and collegiate academic performance decrements: Early findings, Journal of Communication, 51, 366, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02885.x Kvavik, R. (2005). Convenience, communications, and control: How students use technology. In D. Oblinger, & J. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the net generation (chapter 7) [e-book]. Retrieved July 31, 2009 from http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen/5989. Lei, 2005, Technology uses and student achievement: A longitudinal study, Computers & Education, 49, 284, 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.013 Lipsman, A. (2007a). Facebook sees flood of new traffic from teenagers and adults. ComScore. Retrieved November 13, 2009 from http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1519. Margaryan, A., & Littlejohn, A. (2008). Are digital natives a myth or reality? Students’ use of technologies for learning. Final draft (December 11, 2008) available online at http://www.academy.gcal.ac.uk/anoush/documents/DigitalNativesMythOrReality-MargaryanAndLittlejohn-draft-111208.pdf. Mark, G., Gudith, D., & Klocke, U. (2008). The cost of interrupted work: More speed and stress. In Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems association for computing machinery, April 5–10, 2008, Florence, Italy (doi:10.1145/1357054.1357072). National Telecommunications and Information Administration- NTIA (2000). Falling through the Net: Defining the digital divide: A report on the telecommunications and information technology gap in America. US Department of Commerce. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. Washington, DC: NTIA. Available at http://search.ntia.doc.gov/pdf/fttn00.pdf. Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (2005). Is it age or IT: First steps towards understanding the net generation. In D. Oblinger, & J. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the Net Generation (pp. 2.1–2.20). Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE. Available at http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen. Ophira, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America, 106(33), September 15. Available at http://www.pnas.org/content/106/37/15583. Owen, 2004, Just a tool? Owen, M (2004b). The myth of the digital native. Available from www.futurelab.org.uk/viewpoint/art26.htm. Pasek, J., More, E., & Hargittai, E. (May, 2009). Facebook and academic performance: Reconciling a media sensation with data. First Monday, 14(5). Available at http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2498/2181. Prenksy, 2001, Digital natives, digital immigrants, On the Horizon, 9, 1, 10.1108/10748120110424816 Prensky, 2003, Digital game-based learning, ACM Computers in Entertainment, 1, 1, 10.1145/950566.950596 Rosen, 2007 SPSS (2009). Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences 17.0 for Windows. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc. Strayer, 2007, Multi-tasking in the automobile, 121 Strayer, 2006, A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver, Human Factors, 48, 381, 10.1518/001872006777724471 Strayer, 2003, Cell phone induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 23, 10.1037/1076-898X.9.1.23 Sweller, 2007, Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: A reply to commentaries, Educational Psychologist, 47, 115, 10.1080/00461520701263426 Tapscott, 1997 Vanden Boogart, M. R. (2006). Uncovering the social impacts of Facebook on a college campus. Unpublished Masters Thesis. Kansas State University. Veen, 2006 Wallis, C. (2006). The multitasking generation. Time Magazine. Available at http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1174696,00.html. Xu, L. (2008). Impact of simultaneous collaborative multitasking on communication performance and experience. Unpublished Dissertation. The Ohio State University. Zuckerberg, M. (2005). Thefacebook.com. Retrieved June 13, 2008. Available from http://thefacebook.com/about.php.