Pregnant Women in Women-Only and Mixed-Gender Substance Abuse Treatment Programs: A Comparison of Client Characteristics and Program Services

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 33 - Trang 431-442 - 2006
Yih-Ing Hser1, Noosha Niv
1UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, USA

Tóm tắt

This study compared characteristics of pregnant women treated in women-only (WO) and mixed-gender (MG) substance abuse treatment programs and compared services provided by these two types of programs. Participants were 407 pregnant women who were admitted to 7 WO programs and 29 MG programs in 13 counties across California during 2000–2002. Pregnant women treated in WO programs demonstrated greater severity in drug use, legal problems, and psychiatric problems than those treated in the MG programs. They were also less likely to be employed and more likely to be homeless. Women-only programs were more likely to offer child care, children’s psychological services, and HIV testing. The greater problem severity of pregnant women treated in WO programs suggests that these specialized services are filling an important gap in addiction services, although further expansion is warranted in psychiatric, legal, and employment services.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Howell EM, Heiser N, Harrington M. A review of recent findings on substance abuse treatment for pregnant women. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 1999;16:195–219. National Institute on Drug Abuse. National Pregnancy Health Survey: Drug Use among Women Delivering Live Births: 1992. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1996. Huestis MA, Choo RE. Drug abuse’s smallest victims: in utero drug exposure. Forensic Science International. 2002;128:20–30. Grella CE, Polinsky ML, Hser YI, et al. Characteristics of women-only and mixed-gender drug abuse treatment programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 1999;17:37–44. Hser YI, Huang D, Teruya C, et al. Gender comparisons of drug abuse treatment outcomes and predictors. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2003;72:255–264. Messina N, Burdon W, Hagopian G, et al. Predictors of prison-based treatment outcomes: a comparison of men and women participants. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 2006;32:7–28. Messina N, Burdon W, Prendergast M. Assessing the needs of women in institutional therapeutic communities. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation. 2003;37:89–106. Messina N, Prendergast M. Therapeutic community treatment for women in prison: assessing outcomes and needs. In: Knight K, Farabee D, eds. Treating Addicted Offenders: A Continuum of Effective Practices. New York: Civic Research Institute; 2004. Messina N, Wish E, Nemes S. Predictors of treatment outcomes in men and women admitted to a therapeutic community. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 2000;26:207–227. Hser YI, Evans E, Huang D. Treatment outcomes among women and men methamphetamine abusers in California. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2005;28:77–85. Hser YI, Anglin MD, McGlothlin W. Sex differences in addict careers: initiation of use. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 1987;13:33–57. Owen B. “In the Mix”: Struggle and Survival in a Women’s Prison. Albany: State University Press of New York; 1998. Covington SS, Surrey JL. The relational model of women’s psychological development: implications for substance abuse. In: Wilsnack RW, Wilsnack, SC, eds. Gender and Alcohol: Individual and Social Perspectives. Piscataway, NJ: US Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies; 1997. El-Guebaly N. Alcohol and polysubstance abuse among women. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 1995;40(2):73–79. Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR, et al. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003. Staton M, Leukefeld C, Webster JM. Substance use, health, and mental health: problems and service utilization among incarcerated women. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2003;47:224–239. Wagner CL, Katikaneni LD, Cox TH, et al. The impact of prenatal drug exposure on the neonate. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 1998;25:169–194. Grella CE. Services for perinatal women with substance abuse and mental health disorders; the unmet need. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 1997;29:67–78. Prendergast ML, Wellisch J, Falkin GP. Assessment and services for substance-abusing women offenders in community and correctional settings. The Prison Journal. 1995;75:240–256. Grella CE, Joshi V, Hser YI. Program variation in treatment outcomes among women in residential drug treatment. Evaluation Review. 2000;24:364–383. Copeland J, Hall W. A comparison of women seeking drug and alcohol treatment in a specialist women’s and two traditional mixed-sex treatment services. British Journal of Addiction. 1992;87:1293–1302. Copeland J, Hall W, Didcott P, et al. A comparison of a specialist women’s alcohol and other drug treatment service with two traditional mixed-sex services: client characteristics and treatment outcome. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 1993;32:81–92. Dalhgren L, Willander A. Are special treatment facilities for female alcoholics needed? A controlled 2-year follow-up study from a specialized female unit (EWA) versus a mixed male/female treatment facility. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 1989;33:499–504. Ashley OS, Marsden ME, Brady TM. Effectiveness of substance abuse treatment programming for women: a review. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 2003;29(1):19–53. McLellan AT, Kushner H, Metzger D, et al. The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 1992;9:199–213. Hser YI, Evans E, Teruya C, et al. The California Treatment Outcome Project (CalTOP) Final Report. Los Angeles: University of California, Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs; 2002. Evans E, Hser YI. Pilot-testing a statewide outcome monitoring system: overview of the California Treatment Outcome Project (CalTOP). Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 2004;S2:109–114. McLellan AT, Luborsky L, Woody GE, et al. An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients: The Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 1980;168:26–33. Grella CE. Women in residential drug treatment: differences by program type and pregnancy. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. 1999;10:216–229. Alverson H, Alverson M, Drake, RE. An ethnographic study of the longitudinal course of substance abuse among people with severe mental illness. Community Mental Health Journal. 2000;36:557–569. Weisner C. The provision of services for alcohol problems: a community perspective for understanding access. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2001;28(2):130–142.