The Essential Network (TEN): engagement and mental health insights from a digital mental health assessment tool for Australian health professionals during COVID-19
Tóm tắt
Health professionals are at risk of poor mental health outcomes due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Essential Network (TEN) is a blended care mental health support service for Australian health professionals, funded by the Australian Federal Department of Health. TEN comprises both digital and face-to-face components. We examined completed digital mental health assessments (Digital Mental Health Check-Up) to understand usage of TEN and the demographics and mental health of users. A total of 9889 completed assessments from a community sample of help-seeking health professionals who engaged with the Digital Mental Health Check-Up between May 2020 and December 2021 were examined. Users had the option to complete the Distress Questionnaire (DQ-5), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI-16), Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS), Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-5), as well as provide demographic information on their gender, age, and profession. Users were mostly women (85.7%) aged between 25 and 54 (73.7%). Nursing was the most reported profession (32.6%), followed by allied health (27.5%) and doctors (21.9%). Notably, 8.1% of users reported being in medical administration roles. Mental health measures were poor across all measures and professions and worse than would be expected from the general population. Disengagement (92.5%) from burnout and impaired social and occupational functioning (75%) were also notably high. Use of the DQ-5 as a screening tool in the Digital Mental Health Check-Up was confirmed through correlation with clinically significance scoring on all other measures and increased likelihood of opting to complete other optional measures following clinically significant scoring on the DQ-5. The present study indicates good usage of the TEN digital components among Australian health professionals, with use across all professional categories. While self-selection bias is inherent in the sample, mental health measures were notably poor – particularly for burnout. Such findings highlight the continued need to provide mental health support to health professionals both during and after the eventual resolution of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to develop better support for health professionals experiencing burnout.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Greenberg N, Docherty M, Gnanapragasam S, Wessely S. Managing mental health challenges faced by healthcare workers during covid-19 pandemic. BMJ. 2020;368:m1211.
Muhamad Ramzi NA, Deady M, Petrie K, Crawford J, Harvey SB. Help-seeking for depression among Australian doctors. Intern Med J. 2021;51(12):2069–77.
Saragih ID, Tonapa SI, Saragih IS, et al. Global prevalence of mental health problems among healthcare workers during the Covid-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;121:104002.
Yuan K, Gong Y-M, Liu L, et al. Prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder after infectious disease pandemics in the twenty-first century, including COVID-19: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26(9):4982–98.
Knaak S, Mantler E, Szeto A. Mental illness-related stigma in healthcare: barriers to access and care and evidence-based solutions. Healthc Manage Forum. 2017;30(2):111–6.
Edwards JL, Crisp DA. Seeking help for psychological distress: barriers for mental health professionals. Aust J Psychol. 2017;69(3):218–25.
Baldwin PA, Black MJ, Newby JM, et al. The Essential Network (TEN): rapid development and implementation of a digital-first mental health solution for Australian healthcare workers during COVID-19. BMJ Innov. 2022;8:105–10.
Erbe D, Eichert H-C, Riper H, Ebert DD. Blending face-to-face and internet-based interventions for the treatment of mental disorders in adults: systematic review. JMIR. 2017;19(9):e6588.
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–13.
Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092–7.
Blevins CA, Weathers FW, Davis MT, Witte TK, Domino JL. The posttraumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): development and initial psychometric evaluation. J Trauma Stress. 2015;28(6):489–98.
Batterham PJ, Sunderland M, Carragher N, et al. The distress questionnaire-5: population screener for psychological distress was more accurate than the K6/K10. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;71:35–42.
Zuromski KL, Ustun B, Hwang I, et al. Developing an optimal short-form of the PTSD checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Depress Anxiety. 2019;36(9):790–800.
Demerouti E, Bakker AB. The Oldenburg Burnout Inventory: a good alternative to measure burnout and engagement. In: Halbesleben JRB, editor. Handbook of stress and burnout in health care. Hauppauge: Nova Science; 2008. p. 65- 78(7).
Mundt JC, Marks IM, Shear MK, Greist JM. The work and social adjustment scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. B J Psychiatry. 2002;180(5):461–4.
SAS. SAS Customer Intelligence 360. 2019. https://www.sas.com/en_au/solutions/customer-intelligence.html. Accessed 25 Jan 2023.
Peterson U, Demerouti E, Bergström G, Samuelsson M, Åsberg M, Nygren Å. Burnout and physical and mental health among Swedish healthcare workers. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):84–95.
Richards D, Timulak L, Rashleigh C, et al. Effectiveness of an internet-delivered intervention for generalized anxiety disorder in routine care: a randomised controlled trial in a student population. Internet Interv. 2016;6:80–8.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Health workforce. 2022. www.aihw.gov.au/reports/workforce/health-workforce. Accessed 08 Nov 2022.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. National Study of Mental Health and Wellbeing. 2022. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/mental-health/national-study-mental-health-and-wellbeing/2020-21. Accessed 05 May 2023.
Kisely S, Warren N, McMahon L, Dalais C, Henry I, Siskind D. Occurrence, prevention, and management of the psychological effects of emerging virus outbreaks on healthcare workers: rapid review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020;369:m1642.
Smallwood N, Karimi L, Bismark M, et al. High levels of psychosocial distress among Australian frontline healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey. Gen Psychiatry. 2021;34(5):e100577.
Fisher JR, Tran TD, Hammarberg K, et al. Mental health of people in Australia in the first month of COVID-19 restrictions: a national survey. MJA. 2020;213(10):458–64.
Embriaco N, Papazian L, Kentish-Barnes N, Pochard F, Azoulay E. Burnout syndrome among critical care healthcare workers. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007;13(5):482–8.
Hall LH, Johnson J, Watt I, Tsipa A, O’Connor DB. Healthcare staff wellbeing, burnout, and patient safety: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(7):e0159015.
Litchfield I, Burrows M, Gale N, Greenfield S. Understanding the invisible workforce: lessons for general practice from a survey of receptionists. BMC Prim Care. 2022;23(1):1–10.
Hassamal S, Dong F, Hassamal S, Lee C, Ogunyemi D, Neeki MM. The psychological impact of COVID-19 on hospital staff. West J Emerg Med. 2021;22(2):346.
Cousins S. Experts criticise Australia’s aged care failings over COVID-19. Lancet. 2020;396(10259):1322–3.
Jameson S, Parkinson L. Work-related well-being of personal care attendants employed in the aged care sector: prevalence and predictors of compassion fatigue. Australas J Ageing. 2022;41(2):e131–9.
Scanlan JN, Hazelton T. Relationships between job satisfaction, burnout, professional identity and meaningfulness of work activities for occupational therapists working in mental health. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019;66(5):581–90.
Lattie EG, Stiles-Shields C, Graham AK. An overview of and recommendations for more accessible digital mental health services. Nat Rev Psychol. 2022;1(2):87–100.