A Backward Induction Experiment

Elsevier BV - Tập 104 Số 1 - Trang 48-88 - 2002
Ken Ken, John John, Giovanni Giovanni, Larry Larry, Avner Avner

Tài liệu tham khảo

K. Abbink, G. E. Bolton, A. Sadrieh, and, F.-F. Tang, Adaptive learning versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining, mimeo, University of Bonn, and, Penn State University, 1996. J. Andreoni, P. M. Brown, and, L. Vesterlund, What produces fairness? Some experimental results, Games Econ. Behav, forthcoming. Andreoni, 2002, Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the rationality of altruism, Econometrica, 70, 737, 10.1111/1468-0262.00302 Beard, 1994, Do people rely on the self-interested maximization of others? An experimental test, Manage. Sci., 40, 252, 10.1287/mnsc.40.2.252 Binmore, 1991, Do people exploit their bargaining power? An experimental study, Games Econ. Behav., 3, 295, 10.1016/0899-8256(91)90030-I Binmore, 1998, Hard bargains and lost opportunities, Econ. J., 108, 1279, 10.1111/1468-0297.00343 Binmore, 1985, Testing noncooperative bargaining theory: A preliminary study, Amer. Econ. Rev., 75, 1178 Binmore, 1989, An outside option experiment, Quart. J. Econ., 104, 753, 10.2307/2937866 Blount, 1995, When social outcomes aren't fair: The effect of causal attributions on preferences, Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes, 63, 131, 10.1006/obhd.1995.1068 Bolton, 1991, A comparative model of bargaining: Theory and evidence, Amer. Econ. Rev., 81, 1096 Bolton, 1998, Measuring motivations for the reciprocal responses observed in a simple dilemma game, Exper. Econ., 1, 207, 10.1007/BF01669343 Bolton, 2000, ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity and competition, Amer. Econ. Rev., 90, 166, 10.1257/aer.90.1.166 Bolton, 1995, Anonymity versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining, Games Econ. Behav., 10, 95, 10.1006/game.1995.1026 Camerer, 1993, Cognition and framing in sequential bargaining for gains and losses, 27 Cooper, 1994, Alternative institutions for resolving coordination problems: Experimental evidence on forward induction and preplay communication, 129 Costa-Gomez, 2001, Ultimatum bargaining behavior in Israel, Japan, Slovenia, and the United States: A social utility analysis, Games Econ. Behav., 34, 238, 10.1006/game.2000.0805 Davis, 1993 Dufwenberg, 1996, Efficiency, reciprocity, and expectations in an experimental game, Discussion paper 9679 Dufwenberg, 1998, A theory of sequential reciprocity, Discussion paper 9837 A. Falk, and, U. Fishbacher, A theory of reciprocity, Mimeo, University of Zurich, 1999. Fehr, 1999, A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation, Quart. J. Econ., 114, 817, 10.1162/003355399556151 Güth, 1982, An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 3, 367, 10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7 Güth, 1990, Ultimatum bargaining behavior: A survey and comparison of experimental results, J. Econ. Psych., 11, 417, 10.1016/0167-4870(90)90021-Z Harsanyi, 1988 Holt, 1999, An empirical model of strategic choice with an application to coordination games, Games Econ. Behav., 27, 86, 10.1006/game.1998.0678 Holyoak, 1996 Johnson, 2002, Detecting failures of backward induction: Monitoring information search in sequential bargaining, J. Econ. Theory, 104, 16, 10.1006/jeth.2001.2850 Kagel, 1996, Fairness in ultimatum games with asymmetric information and asymmetric payoffs, Games Econ. Behav., 13, 100, 10.1006/game.1996.0026 Levine, 1998, Modeling altruism and spitefulness in experiments, Rev. Econ. Dynam., 1, 593, 10.1006/redy.1998.0023 McKelvey, 1992, An experimental study of the centipede game, Econometrica, 60, 803, 10.2307/2951567 Ochs, 1989, An experimental study of sequential bargaining, Amer. Econ. Rev., 79, 355 Prasnikar, 1992, Considerations of fairness and strategy: Experimental data from sequential games, Quart. J. Econ., 106, 865, 10.2307/2118366 Rabin, 1993, Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics, Amer. Econ. Rev., 83, 1281 Roth, 1995, Bargaining experiments, 253 Roth, 1991, Bargaining and market power in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An experimental study, Amer. Econ. Rev., 81, 1068 Ruffle, 1998, More is better, but fair is fair: Tipping in dictator and ultimatum games, Games Econ. Behav., 23, 247, 10.1006/game.1997.0630 Samuelson, 2001, Analogies, adaptation, and anomalies, J. Econ. Theory, 97, 320, 10.1006/jeth.2000.2754 T. Slembeck, As if playing fair—Experimental evidence on the role of information in ultimatum bargaining, mimeo, University College London, 1998. Straub, 1995, An experimental investigation of ultimatum games: Information, fairness, expectations, and lowest acceptable offers, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 27, 345, 10.1016/0167-2681(94)00072-M Thaler, 1988, Anomalies: The ultimatum game, J. Econ. Perspect., 2, 195, 10.1257/jep.2.4.195 Winter, 1997, An experiment with ultimatum bargaining in a changing environment, Discussion Paper 159 R. Zwick, and, X. P. Chen, What price for fairness? A bargaining study, mimeo, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, 1997. R. Zwick, and, E. Weg, An experimental study of buyer-seller negotiation: Self-interest versus other-regarding behavior, mimeo, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and Purdue University, 1996.