Confined and unreinforced masonry structures in seismic areas: Validation of macro models and cost analysis

Engineering Structures - Tập 199 - Trang 109612 - 2019
Asfandyar Ahmed1, Khan Shahzada2, Syed Muhammad Ali2, Akhter Naeem Khan2, Syed Azmat Ali Shah2
1Department of Civil Engineering, City University of Science and IT, Peshawar, Pakistan
2Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan

Tài liệu tham khảo

Asian Development Bank/World Bank (ADB/WB) [2005] “Preliminary damage and needs assessment - Pakistan 2005 earthquake,” Report No. ADB-WB; 2005. EN 1998-1:2004. Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance – part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization; 2004. EN 1998-3:2005. Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization; 2005. IBC. Norme tecniche per le costruzioni (‘‘Italian building code’’), Ministerial Decree dated of 17-01-2018. Rome: Ministero delle Infrastrutture e deiTrasporti; 2018 [in Italian]. Beyer, 2012, Quasi-static cyclic tests on masonry spandrels, Earthq Spectra, 28, 907, 10.1193/1.4000063 Dong, 2016, Performance-based seismic assessment of conventional and base isolated steel buildings including environmental impact and resilience, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 45, 739, 10.1002/eqe.2682 Moghaddam, 2006 Bruneau, 1995, Performance of masonry structures during the 1994 Northridge (Los Angeles) Earthquake, Can J Civ Eng, 22, 378, 10.1139/l95-048 Jingjiang, 2003, Lateral load pattern in pushover analysis, Earthquake Eng Eng Vib, 2, 99, 10.1007/BF02857542 Makarios, 2005, Optimum definition of equivalent non-linear SDF system in pushover procedure of multistory r/c frames, Eng Struct, 27, 814, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.01.005 Jiang, 2010, A modified approach of energy balance concept based multimode pushover analysis to estimate seismic demands for buildings, Eng Struct, 32, 1272, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.01.003 Milani, 2006, Homogenised limit analysis of masonry walls Part I: failure surfaces, Comput Struct, 84, 166, 10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.09.005 Milani, 2007, 3D homogenized limit analysis of masonry buildings under horizontal loads, Eng Struct, 29, 3134, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.03.003 Cecchi, 2008, A kinematic FE limit analysis model for thick English bond masonry walls, Int J Solids Struct, 45, 1302, 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.09.019 Pasticier, 2008, Non-linear seismic analysis and vulnerability evaluation of a masonry building by means of the sap2000 vol 10 code, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 37, 467, 10.1002/eqe.770 Park, 2009, Seismic fragility analysis of low-rise unreinforced masonry structures, Eng Struct, 31, 125, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.07.021 Rota, 2010, A methodology for deriving analytical fragility curves for masonry buildings based on stochastic nonlinear analyses, Eng Struct, 32, 1312, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.01.009 Milani, 2011, Simple homogenization model for the non-linear analysis of in-plane loaded masonry walls, Comput Struct, 89, 1586, 10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.05.004 Akhaveissy, 2011, Lateral strength force of URM structures based on a constitutive model for interface element, Latin Am J Solids Struct, 8, 445, 10.1590/S1679-78252011000400005 FEMA-307. Evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington (DC), USA; 1999. Akhaveissy, 2011, Unreinforced masonry walls: nonlinear finite element analysis with a unified constitutive model, Arch Comput Methods Eng, 18, 485, 10.1007/s11831-011-9067-4 Milani, 2012, Maniace castle in Syracuse, Italy: comparison between present structural situation and hypothetical original configuration by means of full 3D FE models, Open Civil Eng J, 6, 173, 10.2174/1874149501206010173 Akhaveissy, 2012, The DSC model for the nonlinear analysis of in-plane loaded masonry structures, Open Civil Eng J, 6, 200, 10.2174/1874149501206010200 Akhaveissy, 2012, Finite element nonlinear analysis of high-rise unreinforced masonry building, Latin Am J Solids Struct, 9, 547, 10.1590/S1679-78252012000500002 Akhaveissy, 2013, Pushover analysis of large scale unreinforced masonry structures by means of a fully 2D non-linear model, Constr Build Mater, 41, 276, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.006 Bartoli, 2017, Epistemic uncertainties in structural modelling: a blind benchmark for seismic assessment of slender masonry towers, J Perform Constr Facil, 31, 04017067, 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001049 Grant, 2012, A prioritization scheme for seismic intervention in school buildings in Italy, Earthq Spectra, 23, 291, 10.1193/1.2722784 Lagomarsino, 2013, TREMURI program: an equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings, Eng Struct, 56, 1787, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.08.002 Epperson GS, Abrams DP. Nondestructive evaluation of masonry buildings. Tech. Rep. 89-26-0389-26-03, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Advanced Construction Technology Center, Urbana, Ill, USA; 1989. Abrams DP, Shah N. Cyclic load testing of unreinforced masonry walls. Advanced Construction Technology Center 92-26-10, College of Engineering, and University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Advanced Construction Technology Center, and Urbana; 1992. Magenes G, Calvi GM. Cyclic behavior of brick masonry walls. In: Proceedings of the 10th world conf on earthquake engineering, Madrid, Spain; 1992. p. 3517–22. Anthoine A, Magonette G, Magenes G. Shear compression testing and analysis of brick masonry walls. In: Proceedings of the 10th European conf on earthquake engineering, Taylor and Francis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; 1995. p. 1657–62. Manzouri T, Shing PB, Amadei B, Schuller M, Atkinson R. Repair and retrofit of unreinforced masonry walls: experimental evaluation and finite element analysis. Tech. Rep. U/SR-95/2, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colo, USA; 1995. Tomazevic, 1996, Seismic behavior of masonry walls: experimental simulation, J Struct Eng, 122, 1040, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:9(1040) Craig J, Goodno B, Towashiraporn P, Park J. Fragility reduction estimations for URM buildings using response modification. In: Proceedings of the 12th European conf on earthquake engineering research, London, UK; 2002. Franklin, 2003 Calderini, 2009, In-plane strength of unreinforced masonry piers, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 38, 243, 10.1002/eqe.860 Simsir, 2002, Influence of diaphragm flexibility on the out-of- plane response of unreinforced masonry bearing walls Shahzada Khan. Seismic risk assessment of buildings in Pakistan (Case Study Abbottabad City). PhD Thesis; 2012. Ahmed, 2018, Seismic capacity assessment of confined brick masonry building: an experimental approach, Shock Vib, 2018, 1, 10.1155/2018/4756352 Lourenço, 2002, Computations of historical masonry constructions, Prog Struct Eng Mater, 4, 301, 10.1002/pse.120 Lourenco, 1996 Shieh-Beygi, 2008, Numerical analysis of structural masonry: mesoscale approach, Comput Struct, 86, 1958, 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.05.007 Macorini, 2011, A non-linear interface element for 3D mesoscale analysis of brick-masonry structures, Int J Numer Meth Eng, 85, 1584, 10.1002/nme.3046 Ramos, 2004, Advanced numerical analysis of historical centers: a case study in Lisbon, Eng Struct, 26, 1295, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.04.008 Lourenço, 2007, Failure analysis of Monastery of Jerónimos, Lisbon: how to learn from sophisticated numerical models?, Eng Fail Anal, 14, 280, 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.02.002 Carol, 2001, Micromechanical analysis of quasi-brittle materials using fracture-based interface elements, Int J Numer Meth Eng, 52, 193, 10.1002/nme.277 Brocks W, Cornec A, Scheider I. Computational aspects of nonlinear fracture mechanics. In: Milne I, Ritchie RO, Karihaloo B, editors. Comprehensive structural integrity—numerical and computational methods, vol. 3. Elsevier: Oxford; 2003. p. 127–209. Seguarado J, LLorca J. A new three-dimensional interface finite element to simulate fracture in composites. Int J Solids Struct 2004; 41:2977–93. Alfano, 2006, Combining interface damage and friction in cohesive-zone model, Int J Numer Meth Eng, 68, 542, 10.1002/nme.1728 Tomazevic, 1978 Gambarotta, 1997, Damage models for the seismic response of brick masonry shear walls. Part II: the continuum model and its applications, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 26, 23 Rinaldin, 2016, A macro-model with nonlinear springs for seismic analysis of URM buildings, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 45, 2261, 10.1002/eqe.2759 Marques, 2011, Possibilities and comparison of structural component models for the seismic assessment of modern unreinforced masonry buildings, Comput Struct, 89, 2079, 10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.05.021 Calliari R, Manzini CF, Morandi P, Magenes G, Remino M. 2010. User manual of ANDILWall, version 2.5. Rome: ANDIL Assolaterizi; 2010 [in Italian]. Lagomarsino, 2009 Sismica, 2013 Marques, 2014, Unreinforced and confined masonry buildings in seismic regions: validation of macro-element models and cost analysis, Eng Struct, 64, 52, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.01.014 Cervenka Vladimir. Atena Program Documentation, Prague, May 19, 2016. Ahmad, 1970, Analysis of thick and thin shell structures by curved finite elements, Int J Numer Methods Eng, 2, 419, 10.1002/nme.1620020310 Barsotti, 2018, Assessment of the in-plane shear capacity of masonry panels by elementary mechanical models, Eng Struct, 175, 678, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.064 Nakamura, 2017, Applicability of nonlinear static procedures for low-rise unreinforced masonry buildings with flexible diaphragms, Eng Struct, 137, 1, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.049 Betti Michele, Galano Luciano, Vignoli Andrea. Time history seismic analysis of masonry buildings: a comparison between two non-linear modelling approaches. Buildings; 5(2), 597-621. DOI 10.3390/buildings5020597. Cappi A, Castellani A, Gradori G, Locatelli P. Strengthening and repairing of masonry walls damaged by shear actions in their own planes. Publication N. 701, Politecnico di Milano, Istititu di Scienza e Tecnica delle Construzione; 1975. Marques R. New methodologies for seismic design of unreinforced and confined masonry structures. PhD thesis. Guimarães: University of Minho; 2012. Terán-Gilmore, 2009, Displacement-based seismic assessment of low-height confined masonry buildings, Earthq Spectra, 25, 439, 10.1193/1.3111149 Marques, 2013, A model for pushover analysis of confined masonry structures: implementation and validation, Bull Earthq Eng, 11, 2133, 10.1007/s10518-013-9497-5 Calderini C, Cattari S, Lagomarsino S. Numerical investigations on the seismic behaviour of confined masonry walls. In: Proceedings of the 2008 seismic engineering conference ‘‘Commemorating the 1908 Messina and Reggio Calabria Earthquake’’. AIP conference proceedings 1020; 2008. p. 816–23. Caliò, 2012, A new discrete element model for the evaluation of the seismic behavior of unreinforced masonry buildings, Eng Struct, 40, 327, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.039 Fema P-58-1, Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings Volume 1 – Methodology, September-2012. EN 1996-1-1:2005. Eurocode 6: design of masonry structures – Part 1–1: general rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry structures. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization; 2005. Alcocer SM, Arias JG, Vázquez A. Response assessment of Mexican confined masonry structures through shaking table test. In: Proceedings of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada. Paper no 2130; 2004. Market rate system-2017 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, CSR Cell finance department; 2017. Building Code of Pakistan-Seismic Provisions; 2007. 1997 Uniform building code: structural engineering design provisions.