Organizational and institutional factors affecting high-speed rail safety in Japan

Bugalia, N., Maemura, Y., Ozawa, K., 2019a. Safety Culture in High-Speed Railways and the Importance of Top Management Decisions. ADBI Working Paper Series (No. 955). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3512286. Bugalia, 2019, Demand risk management of private high-speed rail operators: a review of experiences in Japan and Taiwan, Transp. Policy Campbell, D., 2019. The many human errors that brought down the Boeing 737 MAX. https://www.theverge.com/2019/5/2/18518176/boeing-737-max-crash-problems-human-error-mcas-faa (Oct. 26, 2019). Cooper, 2000, Towards a model of safety culture, Safety Sci., 36, 111, 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00035-7 Dokas, 2013, EWaSAP: an early warning sign identification approach based on a systemic hazard analysis, Safety Sci., 58, 11, 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.03.013 Dong, A., 2012. Application of CAST and STPA to railroad safety in China. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/76491. Estache, A., 2001. Privatization and Regulation of Transport Infrastructure in the 1990s. World Bank Resesarch Observer 16, 85–107. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/994171468336659313/Privatization-and-regulation-of-transport-infrastructure-in-the-1990s (Oct. 26, 2019). Evans, 2013, The economics of railway safety, Res. Transp. Econ., 43, 137, 10.1016/j.retrec.2012.12.003 Evans, 2010, Rail safety and rail privatisation in Japan, Accid. Anal. Prev., 42, 1296, 10.1016/j.aap.2010.02.007 Fan, 2015, Applying systems thinking approach to accident analysis in China: Case study of “7.23” Yong-Tai-Wen High-Speed train accident, Safety Sci., 76, 190, 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.02.017 Feigenbaum, B., 2013. High-Speed Rail in Europe and Asia : Lessons for the United States. https://development.reason.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/high_speed_rail_lessons.pdf (Oct. 26, 2019). Hancock, R., 2015. Shinkansen-The half Century. Kotsu Kyoryoku Kai Foundation. Heinrich, H.W., 1941. Industrial Accident Prevention. A Scientific Approach. New York & London: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. Herrera, I.A., Hollnagel, E., Håbrekke, S., 2010. Proposing safety performance indicators for helicopter offshore on the Norwegian Continental Shelf. Hollnagel, E., 2016. Barriers and accident prevention. Routledge. Hood, C., 2006. Shinkansen: from bullet train to symbol of modern Japan. Routledge. Japan Transport Safety Board, 2019. RI2019-1. http://www.mlit.go.jp/jtsb/railway/rep-inci/RI2019-1-1.pdf (Apr. 9, 2019). Japan Transport Safety Board, 2017. RA2017-8. http://www.mlit.go.jp/jtsb/railway/rep-acci/RA2017-8-2.pdf (Apr. 9, 2019). Japan Transport Safety Board, 2016a. RA2016-5-1. http://www.mlit.go.jp/jtsb/railway/rep-acci/RA2016-5-1.pdf (Apr. 9, 2019). Japan Transport Safety Board, 2016b. RA2016-5-2. http://www.mlit.go.jp/jtsb/railway/rep-acci/RA2016-5-2.pdf (Apr. 9, 2019). Japan Transport Safety Board, 2013. RA2013-1. http://www.mlit.go.jp/jtsb/railway/rep-acci/RA2013-1-1.pdf (Apr. 9, 2019). Japan Transport Safety Board, 2007. RA2007-8. http://www.mlit.go.jp/jtsb/railway/rep-acci/RA2007-8-1.pdf (Apr. 9, 2019). JR East, 2017. JR East Group CSR Report 2017. https://www.jreast.co.jp/e/environment/2017.html (Oct. 17, 2019). JR West, n.d. m-shell model. URL http://www.jrw-union.gr.jp/425-j/425-04.pdf (Oct. 17, 2019). Karanikas, N., Roelen, A., 2019. The Concept towards a Standard Safety Model (STASAM v. 0), in: MATEC Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201927302001. Kasai, Y., 2000. Tokaido Shinkansen reaches technical perfection. Int. Railway J. Rapid Transit Rev. 40. ISSN: 0744-5326. Kawakami, S., 2014. Application of a systems-theoretic approach to risk analysis of high-speed rail project management in the US. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/90315. Kawasaki Heavy Industries Co. Ltd., 2018. Regarding the Defects during Manufacturing Process of Series N700 Shinkansen Train Bogie Frames (Part I). https://global.kawasaki.com/news_C3180928-1.pdf (Apr. 9, 2019). Kontogiannis, 2012, Modeling patterns of breakdown (or archetypes) of human and organizational processes in accidents using system dynamics, Safety Sci., 50, 931, 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.12.011 Leveson, 2015, A systems approach to risk management through leading safety indicators, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 136, 17, 10.1016/j.ress.2014.10.008 Leveson, N., 2011. Engineering a safer world: Systems thinking applied to safety. MIT press. Leveson, 2004, A new accident model for engineering safer systems, Safety Sci., 42, 237, 10.1016/S0925-7535(03)00047-X Leveson, N., Daouk, M., Dulac, N., Marais, K., 2003. A systems theoretic approach to safety engineering. Dept. Aeronaut. Astronaut. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2c6a/696dae481d391365009e8aac537d27165e27.pdf. (Oct. 17, 2019). Li, 2017, An Accident Causation Analysis and Taxonomy (ACAT) model of complex industrial system from both system safety and control theory perspectives, Safety Sci., 92, 94, 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.10.001 Marais, 2006, Archetypes for organizational safety, Safety Sci., 44, 565, 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004 MLIT, 2018. Summary text: Measures about Railway Transport Trouble. http://www.mlit.go.jp/tetudo/tetudo_fr7_000023.html (Apr. 9, 2019). MLIT, 2017. White Paper on Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism in Japan, 2017. http://www.mlit.go.jp/en/statistics/white-paper-mlit-2017.html (Apr. 9, 2019). Ota, S.D., 2008. Assuring safety in high-speed magnetically levitated (maglev) systems : the need for a system safety approach. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/45258. Pariès, 2019, Comparing HROs and RE in the light of safety management systems, Safety Sci., 117, 501, 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.026 Railway Bureau, 2001. Technical Regulatory Standards on Japanese Railways. Ministerial Ordinance prescribed by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Japan. https://www.mlit.go.jp/english/2006/h_railway_bureau/Laws_concerning/14.pdf (Oct. 17, 2019). Rao, 2007, Safety standards for high-speed rail transportation, Transp. Res. Record J. Transp. Res. Board, 35–42 Rasmussen, 1997, Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem, Safety Sci., 27, 183, 10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00052-0 Rasmussen, J., Suedung, I., 2000. Proactive risk management in a dynamic society. Swedish Rescue Services Agency. Read, 2019, Complexity on the rails: a systems-based approach to understanding safety management in rail transport, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety, 188, 352, 10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.038 Reason, 1990 RTRI, 2013. Hearing investigation technique to analyze the background factors of an accident. https://www.rtri.or.jp/eng/rd/seika/2013/01/01_09.html (27 February 2020). RTRI, 2006. Development of Discussion Techniques for Accident Analysis to Improve Safety Morale. https://www.rtri.or.jp/eng/rd/seika/2006/01/safety_E12.html (27 February 2020). Saito, M., 2002. Japanese railway safety and the technology of the day. Japan Railway & Transport Review 33, 4–13. http://www.ejrcf.or.jp/jrtr/jrtr33/f04_sai.html (Oct. 17, 2019). Stringfellow, M.V., 2010. Accident analysis and hazard analysis for human and organizational factors. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/63224. The Japan Times, 2013. JR Hokkaido in crisis. The Japan Times. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2013/11/27/editorials/jr-hokkaido-in-crisis/#.Xae8KugvM2x (Oct. 17, 2019). UIC, 2018. High Speed Lines in the World. https://uic.org/IMG/pdf/uic_high_speed_2018_ph08_web.pdf (Oct. 17, 2019). Underwood, 2014, Systems thinking, the Swiss Cheese Model and accident analysis: a comparative systemic analysis of the Grayrigg train derailment using the ATSB, AcciMap and STAMP models, Accid. Anal. Prev., 68, 75, 10.1016/j.aap.2013.07.027 Yousefi, A., Hernandez, M.R., Peña, V.L., 2019. Systemic accident analysis models: A comparison study between AcciMap, FRAM, and STAMP. Process Safety Progress 38 (2). https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12002.