Are rapid and inclusive energy and climate transitions oxymorons? Towards principles of responsible acceleration

Energy Research & Social Science - Tập 79 - Trang 102164 - 2021
Tomas Moe Skjølsvold1, Lars Coenen2
1Dept. of Interdisciplinary Studies of Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Norway
2The Mohn Centre for Innovation and Regional Development, Western Norway University of Applied Science, Norway

Tài liệu tham khảo

Schot, 2018, Deep transitions: emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality, Res. Policy, 47, 1045, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.009 Donald, 2019, The double crisis: in what sense a regional problem?, Regional Studies, 53, 297, 10.1080/00343404.2018.1490014 McCoy, 2018, Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: common patterns, dynamics, and pernicious consequences for democratic polities, Am. Behav. Sci., 62, 16, 10.1177/0002764218759576 Ćetković, 2020, Changing climate for populists? examining the influence of radical-right political parties on low-carbon energy transitions in Western Europe, Energy Res. Social Sci., 66, 101571, 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101571 Kuzemko, 2020, Covid-19 and the politics of sustainable energy transitions, Energy Res. Social Sci., 68, 101685, 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101685 Sovacool, Benjamin K., David J. Hess, Sulfikar Amir, Frank W. Geels, Richard Hirsh, Leandro Rodriguez Medina, Clark Miller et al. Sociotechnical agendas: reviewing future directions for energy and climate research. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 70 (2020): 101617. Rosa, 2003, Social acceleration: ethical and political consequences of a desynchronized high–speed society, Constellations, 10, 3, 10.1111/1467-8675.00309 Rosa, 2013 Peck, 2015 Bridge, 2018, The map is not the territory: a sympathetic critique of energy research’s spatial turn, Energy Res. Social Sci., 36, 11, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.033 Wanvik, 2021, Populism, instability, and rupture in sustainability transformations, Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. S. Jasanoff, (Ed.). States of knowledge: the co-production of science and the social order. Routledge, 2004. Ryghaug, 2020 Geels, 2002, Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study, Res. Policy, 31, 1257, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8 Kemp, 1998, Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management, Technol. Anal. Strategic Manage., 10, 175, 10.1080/09537329808524310 Köhler, 2019, An agenda for sustainability transitions research: state of the art and future directions, Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans., 31, 1, 10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004 Roberts, 2018, The politics of accelerating low-carbon transitions: towards a new research agenda, Energy Res. Social Sci., 44, 304, 10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.001 Markard, 2020, Challenges in the acceleration of sustainability transitions, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 081001, 10.1088/1748-9326/ab9468 Ryghaug, 2020 Robison, 2020 Mochizuki, 2017, Disasters as opportunity for change: tsunami recovery and energy transition in Japan, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 21, 331, 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.009 Parris, 2003, Characterizing a sustainability transition: goals, targets, trends, and driving forces, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 100, 8068, 10.1073/pnas.1231336100 Hansen, 2015, The geography of sustainability transitions: review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field, Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans., 17, 92, 10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001 Schot, 2018, Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change, Res. Policy, 47, 1554, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011 Jenkins, 2018, Humanizing sociotechnical transitions through energy justice: an ethical framework for global transformative change, Energy Policy, 117, 66, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.036 Sareen, 2018, Bridging socio-technical and justice aspects of sustainable energy transitions, Appl. Energy, 228, 624, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.104 Moe, 2016 Stirling, 2011, Pluralising progress: from integrative transitions to transformative diversity, Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans., 1, 82, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.03.005 Wynne, 1992, Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science, Public Understand. Sci., 1, 281, 10.1088/0963-6625/1/3/004 Callon, 1999, The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge, Sci., Technol. Soc., 4, 81, 10.1177/097172189900400106 Latour, 2004 Jenkins, 2016, Energy justice: a conceptual review, Energy Res. Social Sci., 11, 174, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004 Delina, 2018, Of temporality and plurality: an epistemic and governance agenda for accelerating just transitions for energy access and sustainable development, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability, 34, 1, 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.05.016 Lundvall, Bengt-Ake, The Social Dimension of the Learning Economy (1996). DRUID WORKING PAPER NO. 96-1, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=66537 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.66537. Steffen, 2007, The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature, AMBIO: J. Human Environ., 36, 614, 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2 Steffen, 2015, The trajectory of the Anthropocene: the great acceleration, Anthropocene Rev., 2, 81, 10.1177/2053019614564785 Laurent, 2011, Technologies of democracy: experiments and demonstrations, Sci. Eng. Ethics, 17, 649, 10.1007/s11948-011-9303-1 S. Jasanoff, Science and democracy. The handbook of science and technology studies, 259–288. 2015 Miller, 2004, Interrogating the civic epistemology of American democracy. Stability and instability in the 2000 US Presidential Election, Soc. Stud. Sci., 34, 501, 10.1177/0306312704045661 Irwin, 2006, The politics of talk: coming to terms with the ‘New’ scientific governance, Soc. Stud. Sci., 36, 299, 10.1177/0306312706053350 Irwin, 1995 Marres, 2016 Scheuerman, 2020 H. Colby, A.S. Ebbersmeyer, L.M. Heim, M.K. Røssaak, Judging climate change: the role of the judiciary in the fight against climate change. Oslo Law Review, 7(03), 168–185. Bang, 2020, From oil as welfare to oil as risk? Norwegian petroleum resource governance and climate policy, Climate Policy, 20, 997, 10.1080/14693062.2019.1692774 Mulvaney, 2013, Opening the black box of solar energy technologies: exploring tensions between innovation and environmental justice, Sci. Culture, 22, 230, 10.1080/09505431.2013.786995 Baum, 2006, Participatory action research, J. Epidemiol. Community Health, 60, 854, 10.1136/jech.2004.028662 Knudsen, K. Jørgen, Line Camilla Wold, Øystein Aas, Jens Jacob Kielland Haug, Susana Batel, Patrick Devine-Wright, Marte Qvenild, and Gerd B. Jacobsen, Local perceptions of opportunities for engagement and procedural justice in electricity transmission grid projects in Norway and the UK. Land Use Policy 48 (2015): 299–308. Jasanoff, 2018, Just transitions: a humble approach to global energy futures, Energy Res. Social Sci., 35, 11, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.025 Andersen, 2020, The innovation and industry dynamics of technology phase-out in sustainability transitions: insights from diversifying petroleum technology suppliers in Norway, Energy Res. Social Sci., 64, 101447, 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101447 Markard, 2018, The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy, Nat. Energy, 3, 628, 10.1038/s41560-018-0171-7 Canzler, 2017, From “living lab” to strategic action field: bringing together energy, mobility, and Information Technology in Germany, Energy Res. Social Sci., 27, 25, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.02.003 Sovacool, 2017, Contestation, contingency, and justice in the Nordic low-carbon energy transition, Energy Policy, 102, 569, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.045 Powells, 2019, Flexibility capital and flexibility justice in smart energy systems, Energy Res. Social Sci., 54, 56, 10.1016/j.erss.2019.03.015 Lieu, 2020, Three sides to every story: Gender perspectives in energy transition pathways in Canada, Kenya and Spain, Energy Res. Social Sci., 68, 101550, 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101550 Skjølsvold, 2013, What we disagree about when we disagree about sustainability, Soc. Nat. Resour., 26, 1268, 10.1080/08941920.2013.797527 Hulme, 2020, Is it too late (to stop dangerous climate change)? an editorial, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change, 11, 10.1002/wcc.619 Shove, 2007, CAUTION! transitions ahead: politics, practice, and sustainable transition management, Environ. Plann. A, 39, 763, 10.1068/a39310 Latour, 2004, Why has critique run out of steam? from matters of fact to matters of concern, Crit. Inquiry, 30, 225, 10.1086/421123 Ràfols, 2019, S&T indicators in the wild: contextualization and participation for responsible metrics, Res. Evaluat., 28, 7, 10.1093/reseval/rvy030 2017 Biggi, 2021, The noxious consequences of innovation: what do we know?, Ind. Innov., 28, 19, 10.1080/13662716.2020.1726729 Vinsel, 2020 Stilgoe, 2013, Developing a framework for responsible innovation, Res. Policy, 42, 1568, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008 R. Von Schomberg, J. Hankins, (eds.). International handbook on responsible innovation: A global resource. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019. Rodríguez-Pose, 2018, The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it), Cambridge J. Regions, Econ. Soc., 11, 189, 10.1093/cjres/rsx024 Dijkstra, 2020, The geography of EU discontent, Regional Studies, 54, 737, 10.1080/00343404.2019.1654603 Johnstone, 2017, Phasing out coal, sustaining coal communities? Living with technological decline in sustainability pathways, Extr. Ind. Soc., 4, 457 P. Stegmaier, S. Kuhlmann, V.R. Visser, et al., 2014. The discontinuation of socio-technical systems as a governance problem, in: Edler, J., Borrás, S. (Eds.), The Governance of Systems Change: Explaining Change. pp. 111-131 Haarstad, H., Wanvik, T.I., 2017. Carbonscapes and beyond: Conceptualizing the instability of oil landscapes. Progress in Human Geography 41, 432-450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516648007. Murphy, 2019, Generative urbanization in Africa? a sociotechnical systems view of Tanzania’s urban transition, Urban Geography, 40, 128, 10.1080/02723638.2018.1500249 Bridge, 2013, Geographies of energy transition: space, place and the low-carbon economy, Energy Policy, 53, 331, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066 Murphy, 2013, Understanding transition—periphery dynamics: renewable energy in the Highlands and Islands of Scotland, Environ. Plann. A, 45, 691, 10.1068/a45190 Munro, 2019, The geography of socio-technical transitions: transition–periphery dynamics, Geograph. J., 185, 447, 10.1111/geoj.12306 Naumann, 2020, Conceptualizing rural energy transitions: Energizing rural studies, ruralizing energy research, J. Rural Stud., 73, 97, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.12.011 Newell, 2013, The political economy of the ‘just transition’, Geogr. J., 179, 132, 10.1111/geoj.12008 2017 Shearmur, 2012, Are cities the font of innovation? a critical review of the literature on cities and innovation, Cities, 29, 9, 10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.008 Binz, 2017, Global Innovation Systems—a conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts, Res. Policy, 46, 1284, 10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012 Schwanen, 2018, Thinking complex interconnections: transition, nexus and geography, Trans. Institute Br. Geographers, 43, 262, 10.1111/tran.12223 Hautala, 2018, Creativity in arts and sciences: collective processes from a spatial perspective, Environ. Plann. A: Econ. Space, 50, 1688, 10.1177/0308518X18786967 Grabher, 2018, Marginality as strategy: leveraging peripherality for creativity, Environ. Plann. A: Econ. Space, 50, 1785, 10.1177/0308518X18784021 Hayter, 2003, Relocating resource peripheries to the core of economic geography's theorizing: rationale and agenda, Area, 35, 15, 10.1111/1475-4762.00106 F. Barbera, Polycentric voicesCall for a European urban/rural balance. Eurozine, march 2021, https://www.eurozine.com/polycentric-voices/, 2021. Duijndam, 2020, Understanding public concern about climate change in Europe, 2008–2017: the influence of economic factors and right-wing populism, Climate Policy, 1 T.G. Ash, A. Zimmermann, In Crisis, Europeans Support Radical Positions. Climate Change and Social Welfare issues most salient, 2020. https://eupinions.eu/de/text/in-crisis-europeans-support-radical-positions. S. Wyatt, Technological determinism is dead; long live technological determinism. The handbook of science and technology studies, 3, 165–180. K.H. Sørensen, Technology in use: Two essays in the domestication of artefacts, 1994.Centre for technology and society working paper,2, 94. Mazzucato, 2018 S. Woolgar, It could be otherwise. InKeynote Address at the Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Accounting Conference, July(Vol. 9) (2015). Hess, 1997 Bijker, 2010, How is technology made?—that is the question!, Camb. J. Econ., 34, 63, 10.1093/cje/bep068 Haas, 1992, Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination, Int. Organiz., 1, 10.1017/S0020818300001442 Valkenburg, 2020, Responsible innovation as empowering ways of knowing, J. Responsible Innov., 7, 6, 10.1080/23299460.2019.1647087 Turnheim, 2019, Opening up the feasibility of sustainability transitions pathways (STPs): representations, potentials, and conditions, Res. Policy, 48, 775, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.002 Ràfols, 2019, S&T indicators in the wild: contextualization and participation for responsible metrics, Res. Evaluat., 28, 7, 10.1093/reseval/rvy030 E. Ostrom, Scales, polycentricity, and incentives: designing complexity to govern complexity. Protection of global biodiversity: converging strategies, 1998. 2020 Coenen, 2020, Evolving geographies of innovation: existing paradigms, critiques and possible alternatives, Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian J. Geogr., 74, 13, 10.1080/00291951.2019.1692065 Klinke, 2013, Chronopolitics: a conceptual matrix, Prog. Hum. Geogr., 37, 673, 10.1177/0309132512472094 Pink, 2008, Sense and sustainability: the case of the Slow City movement, Local Environ., 13, 95, 10.1080/13549830701581895 Flemsæter, 2020, The rhythms of canal tourism: synchronizing the host-visitor interface, J. Rural Stud., 78, 199, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.06.010